Bibii Banger — CS2 Stats

CA76561198150174642[U:1:189908914]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

195Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.4 Developing

Premier CS Rating14,735Blue band · top ~29.8% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54

Positioning47

Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT43–53–4Last 10043%Win rateWWLWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4

Aggression6.7

Utility3.4

Positioning4.7

Opening Duels2.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 653ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4

Positioning4.7

Utility3.4

Mechanics4.3

Opening Duels2.9

Win Impact6.7

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time669ms−24ms

first ⅓ avg 693ms → last ⅓ avg 669ms

Headshot accuracy19.2%+3.2%

first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — nuke 13–6

13–0Biggest win — inferno

5Longest win streak

W2Current streak

5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 56% over 16infernoWeakest map · 35% over 20

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	24	9–15	38%	0.00
inferno	C	20	7–13	35%	-0.01
ancient	A	16	9–7	56%	0.01
nuke	B	15	8–7	53%	0.01
mirage	C	14	6–8	43%	-0.03
anubis	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.02
overpass	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.10
cache	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy

35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.6%Spray accuracy

69.2%Counter-strafing

11.2°Preaim

653msReaction time

27.2%T opening success

52.9%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

9.4%Flash assists

9.73HE damage / grenade

2.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4998 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.2454% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–8	-0.03	38%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.01	31%	29 Aug →
ancient	4–13	0.05	14%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.00	19%	28 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	25%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	16%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	13%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.10	20%	16 Aug →
inferno	14–16	0.04	12%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–0	-0.04	7%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.04	24%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.07	19%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.06	19%	8 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.08	13%	8 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	21%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–4	-0.03	15%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.04	16%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–2	-0.05	20%	3 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.05	33%	2 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.05	12%	2 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.05	22%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.07	14%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.05	21%	2 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	21%	30 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.02	12%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.07	22%	30 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	17%	28 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.00	22%	28 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	15%	28 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.07	25%	27 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	13%	27 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.10	30%	27 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.03	13%	23 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.02	29%	23 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	13%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.04	15%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.08	19%	13 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.06	13%	13 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	15%	30 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	13%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.00	27%	24 Jun →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	12%	24 Jun →
overpass	6–13	-0.09	7%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.07	17%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.04	16%	21 Jun →
anubis	13–4	0.01	24%	21 Jun →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	26%	7 Jun →
vertigo	13–6	0.07	14%	7 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.09	15%	7 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	14%	28 May →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	8%	27 Apr →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	10%	27 Apr →
nuke	13–10	0.03	23%	27 Apr →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	9%	22 Apr →
ancient	13–11	0.02	20%	16 Apr →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	14%	16 Apr →
ancient	13–16	0.05	23%	11 Apr →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	17%	11 Apr →
dust2	13–10	0.05	18%	5 Apr →
inferno	6–13	0.00	18%	5 Apr →
dust2	1–8	-0.03	13%	5 Apr →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	21%	4 Apr →
ancient	13–3	0.01	16%	4 Apr →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	15%	4 Apr →
mirage	13–11	-0.06	9%	29 Mar →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	17%	20 Mar →
nuke	15–15	0.05	17%	20 Mar →
mirage	13–5	0.02	13%	19 Mar →
anubis	13–1	0.01	22%	19 Mar →
ancient	13–8	0.07	17%	19 Mar →
mirage	10–13	0.02	16%	16 Mar →
ancient	5–13	-0.01	17%	16 Mar →
dust2	9–13	0.06	19%	8 Mar →
inferno	7–13	-0.06	15%	8 Mar →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	13%	7 Mar →
dust2	15–15	0.01	16%	3 Mar →
anubis	6–13	-0.05	20%	3 Mar →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	14%	2 Mar →
inferno	10–13	0.03	17%	2 Mar →
nuke	13–6	0.14	24%	22 Feb →
nuke	3–13	-0.04	14%	22 Feb →
ancient	13–11	0.05	19%	22 Feb →
inferno	2–13	-0.04	0%	21 Feb →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	22%	21 Feb →
dust2	8–13	0.09	25%	4 Feb →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	4%	4 Feb →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	8%	4 Feb →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	9%	4 Feb →
overpass	0–13	-0.11	12%	4 Feb →
dust2	16–14	0.01	14%	3 Feb →
mirage	16–13	0.00	20%	2 Feb →
dust2	13–1	0.09	23%	2 Feb →
nuke	5–13	0.01	13%	24 Jan →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	12%	10 Jan →
ancient	13–4	0.01	17%	10 Jan →
nuke	16–13	-0.00	18%	9 Jan →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	19%	9 Jan →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	18%	4 Jan →
inferno	7–13	0.03	25%	4 Jan →
nuke	13–8	0.02	15%	4 Jan →