Blue Eyes White Dragon

Blue Eyes White Dragon — CS2 Stats

US76561198143200538[U:1:182934810]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

323Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since
983Hours in CS41Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating7,910Light Blue band · top ~64.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#40315 of 54222 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=917), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianBlue band medianvs Blue band
Headshot rate31.4%39.7%41.4%10.1% short
Shot accuracy20.5%6.7%9.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.110.910.97above
Match win rate38.3%42.1%43.7%5.4% short

This profile matches the typical Blue band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBlue Eyes White DragonPREMIER7,910 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning44
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50482Last 10050%Win rateLLTWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1
Aggression3.8
Utility4.0
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.4
Utility4.0
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact1.4

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time604ms−74ms
first ⅓ avg 678ms → last ⅓ avg 604ms
Headshot accuracy13.4%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 11.7% → last ⅓ avg 13.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — dust2 13–4
130Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
812In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 15anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C1981142%-0.02
cacheB168850%0.00
ancientS1510567%-0.02
infernoB158753%-0.00
mirageB158753%0.02
nukeB105550%-0.01
anubisD92722%-0.04
overpass110100%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

38,920Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 25% of Light Blue band
2,189Matches
38.3%Match win rate
31.4%Headshot %
20.5%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Light Blue band
3,195MVPs
592Hours (in match)
1,555Bombs planted
410Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,437dust2
1,724inferno
1,495nuke
320train
174lake
100cbble
79safehouse
55ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.1%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
74.6%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
589msReaction time
23.9%T opening success
45.5%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
2.6%Flash assists
9.18HE damage / grenade
2.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.0907% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.8006 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.8536% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient4–13-0.0225%31 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0412%30 Aug
inferno15–150.0512%30 Aug
cache16–130.0312%29 Aug
mirage13–40.1219%29 Aug
cache10–9-0.0415%29 Aug
cache11–13-0.0311%29 Aug
inferno7–130.028%29 Aug
dust21–13-0.1016%29 Aug
dust24–13-0.0311%29 Aug
ancient13–7-0.047%28 Aug
dust214–16-0.0113%27 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0911%27 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0211%26 Aug
dust24–130.0111%26 Aug
mirage13–80.0322%26 Aug
nuke13–100.0714%25 Aug
cache10–13-0.0523%25 Aug
anubis3–13-0.119%24 Aug
inferno13–5-0.086%24 Aug
cache7–13-0.0121%24 Aug
anubis11–13-0.1013%24 Aug
dust213–9-0.0715%23 Aug
anubis11–13-0.067%23 Aug
cache4–13-0.0316%23 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0412%23 Aug
inferno13–100.0110%22 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0217%22 Aug
anubis16–130.007%22 Aug
inferno10–13-0.029%20 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0322%20 Aug
dust213–7-0.0310%19 Aug
ancient5–130.0114%19 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0317%18 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0616%18 Aug
dust213–10-0.0410%17 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0819%17 Aug
cache9–130.0415%16 Aug
inferno13–50.0416%15 Aug
dust213–40.2227%15 Aug
nuke5–13-0.037%15 Aug
ancient13–30.0511%14 Aug
mirage13–00.1010%13 Aug
ancient11–5-0.0112%13 Aug
dust213–110.0112%12 Aug
ancient16–13-0.095%12 Aug
dust213–2-0.0219%12 Aug
cache13–5-0.027%11 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0619%11 Aug
mirage16–130.075%11 Aug
anubis13–9-0.048%11 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0614%10 Aug
dust25–13-0.066%10 Aug
cache11–13-0.074%9 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0213%9 Aug
dust213–7-0.0424%9 Aug
cache11–130.0411%8 Aug
ancient13–40.089%8 Aug
inferno13–100.0215%8 Aug
cache11–130.0317%8 Aug
cache13–30.2010%8 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0012%8 Aug
nuke13–110.033%7 Aug
inferno10–130.1010%7 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0110%7 Aug
anubis13–160.0414%7 Aug
cache13–60.0113%7 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0510%7 Aug
cache13–5-0.0113%7 Aug
ancient13–40.0517%6 Aug
dust22–13-0.0511%6 Aug
cache16–13-0.036%5 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0312%3 Aug
cache13–10-0.0218%30 Jul
anubis10–13-0.085%29 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0214%22 Jul
dust211–13-0.0513%21 Jul
nuke9–13-0.033%19 Jul
dust22–13-0.110%19 Jul
dust216–140.0511%26 Jun
nuke13–50.028%26 Jun
mirage6–13-0.058%26 Jun
mirage13–20.0717%25 Jun
dust28–13-0.029%25 Jun
mirage13–10-0.019%25 Jun
inferno13–50.0012%24 Jun
dust210–130.028%24 Jun
dust210–130.0424%24 Jun
overpass13–8-0.077%22 Jun
mirage11–130.0116%21 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0112%21 Jun
inferno13–30.0119%21 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0611%21 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0414%7 Jun
mirage13–10-0.056%1 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0912%31 May
mirage11–130.0720%31 May
nuke8–13-0.0318%31 May
nuke16–14-0.0313%9 Mar
mirage7–130.0511%9 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →