양모카

양모카 — CS2 Stats

KR76561198142307637[U:1:182041909]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,787Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,293Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.0 Developing
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,711), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate39.9%42.7%44.0%4.1% short
Shot accuracy15.9%10.8%11.6%above
Kill/death ratio0.921.001.030.11 short
Match win rate46.7%44.1%45.1%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG양모카FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim37
Positioning51
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50473Last 10050%Win rateWLWWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.7
Aggression6.4
Utility5.4
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 676ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.7
Positioning5.1
Utility5.4
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time674ms+53ms
first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 674ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — dust2 13–7
131Biggest win — dust2
8Longest win streak
28In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 9infernoWeakest map · 33% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A33211264%0.00
infernoD2171433%-0.01
mirageB1991047%-0.02
ancientC135838%-0.03
overpassS96367%-0.01
nukeC52340%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

97,645Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
5,840Matches
46.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
39.9%Headshot %
15.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 4 players
12,567MVPs
2,293Hours (in match)
5,668Bombs planted
1,069Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4720,244
AWP11,269
SG 5533,563
P903,062
P2503,043
FAMAS2,847

Lifetime map wins

26,633dust2
8,191inferno
1,283nuke
1,057vertigo
784train
546office
456cbble
264lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
29.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.1%Spray accuracy
70.0%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
676msReaction time
29.9%T opening success
42.4%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
8.85HE damage / grenade
4.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.8971% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–11-0.0514%18 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0713%18 Apr
dust213–10.0725%18 Apr
dust213–100.0524%18 Apr
mirage13–20.0421%18 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0213%8 Mar
inferno10–13-0.077%31 Jan
mirage11–13-0.047%24 Jan
inferno5–13-0.0612%24 Jan
dust22–13-0.0025%24 Jan
dust213–70.0912%24 Jan
dust213–40.0116%3 Jan
inferno11–130.0529%3 Jan
ancient7–13-0.0426%3 Jan
dust23–13-0.080%3 Jan
dust213–8-0.059%3 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0344%3 Jan
dust213–10-0.0319%30 Dec
dust212–120.0120%30 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0816%30 Dec
inferno8–130.0528%22 Dec
dust213–80.0111%22 Dec
inferno8–130.0017%17 Dec
dust213–90.0729%17 Dec
dust25–130.0411%17 Dec
mirage13–10-0.0212%17 Dec
mirage10–13-0.0117%17 Dec
overpass9–13-0.0117%17 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0219%14 Nov
inferno2–13-0.048%14 Nov
dust213–5-0.0229%14 Nov
ancient13–9-0.0021%14 Nov
nuke10–13-0.0424%14 Nov
inferno13–90.0510%12 Nov
dust213–9-0.0122%12 Nov
overpass13–90.0121%12 Nov
inferno13–20.0519%31 Oct
nuke9–13-0.0425%31 Oct
inferno10–13-0.0516%31 Oct
ancient8–13-0.0330%31 Oct
nuke13–7-0.0016%31 Oct
mirage5–13-0.1121%24 Oct
ancient9–13-0.0710%16 Oct
dust26–13-0.0117%16 Oct
inferno7–130.0011%16 Oct
mirage13–100.0630%16 Oct
ancient13–3-0.0324%16 Oct
inferno8–13-0.0611%12 Oct
ancient14–160.004%2 Oct
overpass13–90.0618%2 Oct
dust213–9-0.0118%1 Oct
dust211–130.0119%1 Oct
inferno12–12-0.0213%29 Sept
overpass13–110.0120%29 Sept
dust213–60.0213%29 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0120%29 Sept
nuke13–40.0514%29 Sept
inferno3–13-0.058%29 Sept
dust213–8-0.0221%29 Sept
mirage13–10.0017%29 Sept
mirage13–7-0.059%19 Sept
overpass13–8-0.0617%19 Sept
ancient13–4-0.019%16 Sept
dust213–80.0117%16 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0010%16 Sept
dust213–70.058%16 Sept
dust212–00.0619%16 Sept
dust22–100.0315%16 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0120%15 Sept
dust213–40.0014%15 Sept
inferno13–90.0111%15 Sept
overpass13–9-0.0111%14 Sept
overpass13–7-0.0120%12 Sept
ancient13–30.0320%12 Sept
inferno13–80.0112%12 Sept
mirage9–30.0522%12 Sept
dust29–13-0.0312%12 Sept
dust210–130.0119%12 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0514%12 Sept
dust213–9-0.0319%11 Sept
dust213–10-0.0514%11 Sept
dust210–13-0.0515%11 Sept
mirage1–13-0.0617%11 Sept
dust213–5-0.0129%10 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0115%10 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0310%10 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0715%10 Sept
ancient5–13-0.1113%10 Sept
dust24–13-0.0320%10 Sept
overpass5–130.0119%10 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0619%10 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0114%9 Sept
ancient13–50.0314%9 Sept
overpass8–13-0.0416%9 Sept
mirage13–60.0221%9 Sept
inferno14–16-0.0213%9 Sept
mirage14–16-0.0014%7 Sept
dust213–80.0723%7 Sept
inferno13–90.0312%7 Sept
dust211–13-0.0211%7 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →