Chorbles Balls Deluxe Version

Chorbles Balls Deluxe Version — CS2 Stats

76561198136078312[U:1:175812584]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,206Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since
985Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPassive Rifler
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning34
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48457Last 10048%Win rateLLLWWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.6
Aggression2.9
Utility3.5
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning3.4
Utility3.5
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time595ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — vertigo 5–9
130Biggest win — office
5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 57% over 40infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeA40231757%-0.00
vertigoA116555%0.01
nukeB105550%-0.03
infernoD82625%-0.01
dust2A74357%-0.02
cacheD62433%-0.03
mirage31233%-0.00
anubis32167%-0.01
ancient2020%-0.07
alpine2020%-0.02
overpass21150%-0.02
warden2020%-0.05
fachwerk110100%0.00
debris110100%-0.08
shelter1010%-0.04
train1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

40,936Lifetime kills
0.80K/D
2,975Matches
37.4%Match win rate
39.1%Headshot %
10.6%Shot accuracy
3,362MVPs
985Hours (in match)
1,696Bombs planted
283Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,203office
4,145dust2
1,913inferno
1,885nuke
1,488vertigo
461train
123cbble
76lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.0%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
7.1°Preaim
589msReaction time
24.8%T opening success
28.9%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
8.60HE damage / grenade
5.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.425 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.7644% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–13-0.0815%25 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0614%20 Aug
office9–130.0531%19 Aug
office12–50.0425%18 Aug
nuke9–60.1211%13 Aug
office9–13-0.0316%12 Aug
office13–60.0324%12 Aug
vertigo5–90.1715%11 Aug
office11–130.1218%10 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0725%5 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0319%4 Aug
office4–0-0.0114%4 Aug
fachwerk13–50.0017%4 Aug
dust22–13-0.1112%31 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0223%31 Jul
vertigo13–11-0.0114%29 Jul
vertigo13–7-0.048%29 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0425%29 Jul
cache13–16-0.0015%23 Jul
cache9–13-0.0620%20 Jul
debris9–7-0.0817%9 Jul
shelter12–12-0.0414%9 Jul
nuke0–8-0.0740%6 Jul
office13–8-0.0717%6 Jul
inferno10–130.007%6 Jul
dust213–100.0416%6 Jul
cache12–12-0.0311%30 Jun
cache13–8-0.0513%30 Jun
office6–130.0417%29 Jun
office13–7-0.0421%29 Jun
office13–110.0520%28 Jun
office13–100.059%26 Jun
dust210–130.0720%26 Jun
office5–13-0.0725%24 Jun
office13–8-0.0229%24 Jun
inferno13–20.0822%24 Jun
vertigo4–13-0.0915%21 Jun
cache13–8-0.0122%17 Jun
cache7–13-0.0323%17 Jun
office9–70.0426%14 Jun
vertigo13–7-0.0315%8 Jun
inferno9–30.114%27 Apr
office13–8-0.0714%16 Apr
vertigo13–30.027%16 Apr
inferno3–12-0.0931%13 Apr
alpine4–6-0.0125%13 Apr
nuke13–5-0.0328%13 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0628%9 Apr
office12–12-0.0420%8 Apr
vertigo13–10.0523%8 Apr
vertigo9–13-0.0320%7 Apr
dust212–3-0.0517%1 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0613%1 Apr
dust213–4-0.018%1 Apr
vertigo12–12-0.0313%25 Mar
dust212–12-0.0612%25 Mar
vertigo13–20.0818%19 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0323%18 Mar
nuke13–7-0.0018%18 Mar
office13–9-0.0323%17 Mar
mirage1–100.1029%15 Mar
office12–120.0116%15 Mar
overpass13–10.0114%11 Mar
office13–00.0323%11 Mar
office7–13-0.0226%25 Feb
office6–130.0122%21 Feb
dust213–20.0027%20 Feb
office7–13-0.0230%19 Feb
office9–13-0.0323%16 Feb
office13–100.0613%16 Feb
vertigo11–13-0.0316%12 Feb
train11–130.0423%12 Feb
nuke3–13-0.0921%11 Feb
office13–9-0.0015%11 Feb
anubis3–60.0233%10 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0134%10 Feb
office5–13-0.0723%9 Feb
nuke5–13-0.0328%9 Feb
office4–130.0031%8 Feb
warden8–13-0.0515%5 Feb
office13–5-0.0020%5 Feb
ancient3–13-0.0717%4 Feb
office12–12-0.0422%4 Feb
overpass8–13-0.0519%4 Feb
anubis13–8-0.0010%3 Feb
office13–110.0226%3 Feb
office4–13-0.0131%2 Feb
office13–110.0113%2 Feb
nuke13–11-0.0620%1 Feb
office13–10-0.0525%1 Feb
office4–13-0.0215%1 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0315%31 Jan
office7–13-0.0519%31 Jan
office13–60.0423%30 Jan
office13–90.1217%30 Jan
office13–6-0.0227%29 Jan
office13–6-0.0221%27 Jan
alpine8–13-0.035%27 Jan
office13–11-0.065%27 Jan
warden0–13-0.048%27 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →