Nibbly

Nibbly — CS2 Stats

US76561198135612776[U:1:175347048]Steam profile ↗

1,276Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,628Hours in CS29Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,886Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2463 of 8555 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNibblyFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER22,886 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning57
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY454510Last 10045%Win rateWLWLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.5
Aggression6.9
Utility4.4
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.7
Utility4.4
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.05
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time538ms−72ms
first ⅓ avg 611ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — cache 13–7
130Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
46In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB41221954%0.01
cacheC2291341%0.01
infernoD93633%0.02
dust2D92722%-0.01
ancientD62433%0.00
trainS65183%0.04
overpass3030%0.00
anubis21150%-0.02
nuke21150%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

82,614Lifetime kills
1.15K/D · Top 50% of Pink band
3,458Matches
50.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Pink band
46.6%Headshot %
15.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Pink band
11,065MVPs
1,554Hours (in match)
2,800Bombs planted
976Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,997
SSG 087,803
AWP6,672
P2503,105
MAC-101,758
MP91,696

Lifetime map wins

6,422dust2
4,799inferno
1,022nuke
796train
432cbble
147vertigo
95lake
29safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

124Matches
56%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.9%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.3%Spray accuracy
88.2%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
545msReaction time
27.8%T opening success
56.5%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
8.20HE damage / grenade
5.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.7732% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–10-0.0214%27 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0729%27 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0118%26 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0224%26 Aug
inferno11–130.0137%25 Aug
cache13–6-0.0216%25 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0016%25 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0320%24 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0914%24 Aug
mirage9–130.0219%23 Aug
cache1–13-0.0820%23 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0225%23 Aug
train13–8-0.0232%23 Aug
mirage13–90.0233%23 Aug
cache9–130.0149%23 Aug
overpass8–13-0.0717%23 Aug
mirage13–60.1422%23 Aug
mirage10–130.0220%22 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0117%22 Aug
cache13–9-0.0112%21 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0424%20 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0019%19 Aug
cache13–50.0219%19 Aug
mirage13–70.0326%18 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0916%18 Aug
inferno13–30.0314%17 Aug
nuke11–130.0121%17 Aug
cache0–2-0.110%17 Aug
dust27–13-0.0328%17 Aug
dust214–16-0.0517%17 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0115%17 Aug
dust24–13-0.0115%17 Aug
mirage13–00.0118%17 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0424%17 Aug
inferno3–130.0317%16 Aug
cache7–130.0518%16 Aug
mirage13–80.1420%16 Aug
cache8–130.0021%16 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0618%15 Aug
dust23–13-0.0524%15 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0018%15 Aug
cache4–130.0028%15 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0414%15 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0341%15 Aug
mirage13–10.0628%14 Aug
cache13–70.0833%13 Aug
dust213–11-0.0214%13 Aug
mirage4–110.018%13 Aug
inferno12–120.0723%12 Aug
cache4–13-0.109%12 Aug
cache13–90.0413%11 Aug
mirage10–130.0025%11 Aug
cache13–9-0.0121%9 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0022%9 Aug
inferno13–90.0320%9 Aug
cache15–150.0226%9 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0118%9 Aug
inferno8–130.0440%9 Aug
ancient12–120.0021%9 Aug
mirage13–90.0325%6 Aug
mirage13–100.0023%6 Aug
train13–70.0632%5 Aug
overpass12–120.0025%5 Aug
cache12–120.0038%4 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0020%4 Aug
mirage13–110.0419%3 Aug
cache10–5-0.018%3 Aug
dust213–110.0819%2 Aug
cache12–120.1227%2 Aug
cache13–90.0721%2 Aug
mirage13–70.0237%2 Aug
cache12–120.0418%2 Aug
overpass10–130.0716%1 Aug
cache13–70.1732%1 Aug
mirage1–9-0.0123%29 Jul
cache10–13-0.0118%29 Jul
cache8–130.0333%25 May
mirage12–12-0.0411%21 Feb
mirage13–60.0120%15 Feb
train7–13-0.0319%25 Dec
mirage3–130.0212%25 Dec
dust28–13-0.029%24 Dec
mirage13–30.0719%24 Dec
train13–50.1618%23 Dec
nuke13–2-0.0223%23 Dec
mirage2–130.0522%21 Dec
dust27–130.0228%21 Dec
train13–50.0733%21 Dec
mirage12–120.0623%20 Dec
mirage13–10-0.0138%19 Dec
mirage9–130.0323%18 Dec
mirage13–10-0.0328%14 Dec
mirage11–130.0428%13 Dec
train13–70.0121%13 Dec
mirage13–30.0820%12 Dec
ancient7–00.1321%10 Dec
ancient6–13-0.0424%10 Dec
mirage13–60.0530%9 Dec
mirage13–9-0.0120%9 Dec
dust26–130.0116%7 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →