ʎllɐʇoʇ

ʎllɐʇoʇ — CS2 Stats

US76561198134789908[U:1:174524180]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

481Tracked matches69%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,889Hours in CS44Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,114Purple band · top ~27.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#25325 of 41886 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=673), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate42.6%41.2%42.2%meets
Shot accuracy18.5%12.5%11.9%above
Kill/death ratio1.190.960.98above
Match win rate32.4%42.8%43.6%11.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGʎllɐʇoʇFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER15,114 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning29
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47476Last 10047%Win rateLLWWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1
Aggression0.7
Utility3.7
Positioning2.9
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 663ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning2.9
Utility3.7
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time654ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 713ms → last ⅓ avg 654ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — dust2 13–5
120Biggest win — anubis
8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7ancientWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC23101343%-0.02
cacheC1881044%-0.01
mirageC145936%-0.00
infernoA127558%-0.02
ancientD113827%-0.03
anubisS75271%0.01
dust2440100%0.06
train32167%-0.03
office31233%-0.02
grail2020%-0.02
italy1010%0.02
vertigo110100%-0.04
agency110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

91,516Lifetime kills
1.19K/D · Top 25% of Level 2 players
4,181Matches
32.4%Match win rate
42.6%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 2 players
18.5%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 2 players
7,518MVPs
1,350Hours (in match)
2,485Bombs planted
781Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4716,609
AWP14,139
Negev3,230
P2502,916
SSG 082,641
Knife2,030

Lifetime map wins

4,495inferno
3,946dust2
1,658nuke
864train
786office
574vertigo
569cbble
274lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
84.6%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
663msReaction time
18.0%T opening success
19.3%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
3.95HE damage / grenade
8.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3829 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.9616% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
italy2–130.0235%27 Aug
nuke1–9-0.1744%27 Aug
cache13–8-0.0217%14 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0332%13 Aug
cache10–13-0.0415%13 Aug
cache13–8-0.0223%13 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0311%13 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0714%13 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0418%13 Aug
cache13–20.0324%12 Aug
anubis12–0-0.010%12 Aug
mirage10–00.0633%12 Aug
cache13–4-0.0520%12 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0518%12 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0223%12 Aug
train13–10-0.0630%12 Aug
dust213–50.1124%11 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0414%11 Aug
mirage13–80.0317%11 Aug
dust213–100.0223%11 Aug
ancient13–90.0211%11 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0624%10 Aug
cache13–40.0239%10 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0627%10 Aug
mirage11–130.0115%10 Aug
cache3–13-0.096%10 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0324%9 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0312%9 Aug
nuke13–80.0718%9 Aug
nuke13–8-0.066%9 Aug
mirage10–130.0341%8 Aug
inferno9–7-0.058%8 Aug
mirage13–11-0.064%6 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0625%6 Aug
nuke13–50.0122%6 Aug
cache13–100.0615%6 Aug
cache10–130.0017%6 Aug
mirage2–130.0120%5 Aug
nuke8–80.0922%5 Aug
cache15–150.0630%4 Aug
cache6–13-0.079%4 Aug
dust213–6-0.0114%4 Aug
cache14–16-0.0422%4 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0120%4 Aug
cache5–13-0.0223%4 Aug
mirage7–130.0020%4 Aug
anubis13–80.027%4 Aug
anubis11–130.0113%29 Jul
cache10–130.0224%29 Jul
cache7–13-0.0118%29 Jul
ancient13–80.0312%29 Jul
inferno13–30.0210%28 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0212%28 Jul
nuke13–110.0022%28 Jul
cache1–13-0.0638%28 Jul
anubis13–80.0310%28 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0411%28 Jul
anubis13–100.0021%28 Jul
nuke13–110.0019%28 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0922%28 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0230%27 Jul
ancient7–1-0.0150%27 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0344%27 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0217%27 Jul
cache13–11-0.0231%27 Jul
nuke3–13-0.077%27 Jul
mirage15–150.0216%27 Jul
dust213–110.1117%27 Jul
anubis7–130.0219%26 Jul
cache13–40.0030%26 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0323%26 Jul
ancient9–13-0.076%25 Jul
ancient5–13-0.048%25 Jul
inferno13–70.000%6 Mar
nuke7–9-0.1024%9 Nov
nuke7–130.0520%8 Nov
office9–13-0.0319%6 Nov
mirage1–130.0513%28 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0121%28 Jul
inferno16–140.0522%28 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0914%11 Jul
inferno13–110.0324%11 Jul
nuke13–70.0213%11 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0115%9 Jul
vertigo13–10-0.0419%8 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0422%26 Jun
nuke10–130.0934%26 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0929%22 May
train13–7-0.0510%22 May
train2–130.0120%18 May
nuke12–12-0.0111%18 May
inferno12–12-0.0928%16 May
mirage1–13-0.0122%16 May
nuke13–10-0.0221%15 May
office13–20.0617%15 May
agency13–80.0123%13 May
nuke3–100.0119%13 May
grail3–13-0.0223%13 May
grail10–13-0.0327%13 May
office7–13-0.0922%13 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →