w1nnable

w1nnable — CS2 Stats

CA76561198131716433[U:1:171450705]Steam profile ↗

963Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,436Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,431 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGw1nnableFACEITLevel 7 · 1,431 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning57
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56422Last 10056%Win rateWLLLLTLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.0
Aggression8.3
Utility5.8
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch2.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 558ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.7
Utility5.8
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time563ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — inferno 13–2
132Biggest win — mirage
9Longest win streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 77% over 13anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2112957%0.00
infernoA2012860%0.01
mirageB137654%0.01
ancientS1310377%-0.00
nukeA117464%-0.00
anubisD92722%-0.02
overpassB63350%0.00
cache21150%-0.04
train21150%0.01
alpine1010%0.05
palacio110100%0.04
jura1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

73,661Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
3,533Matches
44.6%Match win rate
39.6%Headshot %
17.7%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
8,037MVPs
1,436Hours (in match)
3,272Bombs planted
1,034Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,191
AWP12,672
P903,394
FAMAS1,483
MAC-101,271

Lifetime map wins

5,509inferno
3,776dust2
3,007nuke
997vertigo
959train
707cbble
227lake
175bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

442Matches
52%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
72.4ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient2143%0.8513.9
Dust21553%0.8912.9
Inferno922%1.0116.3
Vertigo633%0.7311.3
Anubis633%0.669.7
Mirage520%0.8818.2
Train333%0.6911.3
Overpass20%0.8812.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.0%Spray accuracy
68.0%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
558msReaction time
34.3%T opening success
54.4%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
10.49HE damage / grenade
10.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.2538% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–9-0.0128%24 Jul
mirage11–130.0815%21 Jul
dust29–13-0.0315%21 Jun
anubis2–13-0.077%18 Jun
dust210–13-0.0319%18 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0123%18 Jun
inferno4–90.0221%17 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0622%13 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0210%12 Jun
ancient16–12-0.017%12 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0221%12 Jun
dust21–130.0930%12 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0312%11 Jun
anubis14–160.0216%11 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0315%11 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0128%11 Jun
inferno13–110.0617%9 Jun
dust210–13-0.0029%6 Jun
dust213–5-0.0325%6 Jun
mirage13–20.0419%6 Jun
dust213–110.0111%6 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0311%5 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0247%5 Jun
anubis13–110.0110%5 Jun
inferno13–160.0217%5 Jun
overpass6–130.0121%5 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0414%5 Jun
ancient5–13-0.069%5 Jun
nuke13–110.0321%4 Jun
dust213–100.0014%4 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0316%4 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0417%3 Jun
inferno1–130.0112%3 Jun
dust213–20.0211%3 Jun
mirage13–110.1627%2 Jun
ancient13–60.0220%2 Jun
overpass13–70.0319%2 Jun
anubis13–5-0.034%2 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0231%2 Jun
inferno13–5-0.0210%2 Jun
ancient13–3-0.0210%2 Jun
nuke13–60.0628%1 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0322%1 Jun
alpine8–130.0513%1 May
cache13–11-0.0420%1 May
cache3–13-0.0413%1 May
anubis7–13-0.0416%28 Apr
ancient13–40.0818%28 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0218%25 Apr
mirage8–130.0114%25 Apr
ancient13–9-0.0214%25 Apr
inferno13–60.0328%25 Apr
dust210–13-0.0518%25 Apr
anubis9–130.0423%25 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0713%24 Apr
nuke13–160.0110%15 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0510%12 Apr
inferno13–80.0718%12 Apr
nuke13–70.0214%11 Apr
inferno13–70.0143%11 Apr
inferno13–20.1826%7 Apr
dust213–90.0113%18 Jan
overpass8–13-0.036%17 Oct
dust213–8-0.0519%17 Oct
palacio13–90.0419%4 Oct
dust213–90.0314%3 Oct
mirage13–8-0.0321%3 Oct
ancient4–13-0.0413%3 Oct
train13–70.026%3 Oct
dust211–13-0.0220%3 Oct
dust213–30.0826%3 Oct
train6–13-0.0119%28 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0030%20 Sept
inferno13–9-0.055%20 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0418%19 Sept
inferno13–60.0420%19 Sept
dust213–10-0.0326%17 Sept
ancient13–50.018%17 Sept
inferno16–14-0.0014%12 Sept
dust29–13-0.0019%12 Sept
ancient13–70.0217%11 Sept
dust213–100.0412%10 Sept
overpass9–13-0.0313%9 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0215%5 Sept
ancient13–70.0316%5 Sept
dust213–50.0215%5 Sept
dust213–20.0411%5 Sept
inferno10–130.0415%5 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0020%5 Sept
overpass13–90.0710%24 Aug
dust212–16-0.0215%22 Aug
dust29–130.0016%22 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0133%19 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0613%15 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0921%15 Aug
jura12–120.0222%30 Jul
inferno13–30.0021%30 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0119%30 Jul
mirage9–130.0216%28 Jul
nuke13–20.0635%27 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →