BheeseChurger63 — CS2 Stats

US76561198127195383[U:1:166929655]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

394Tracked matches36%Win rate2024Tracked since

332Hours in CS

CSDB Rating4.1 Developing

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim59

Positioning46

Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–44–8Last 10048%Win rateLLWLTWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9

Aggression5.6

Utility4.1

Positioning4.6

Opening Duels1.8

Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9

Positioning4.6

Utility4.1

Mechanics3.8

Opening Duels1.8

Win Impact0.3

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time624ms−4ms

first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 624ms

Headshot accuracy15.2%+0.3%

first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — overpass 11–13

13–3Biggest win — cache

9Longest win streak

L2Current streak

14–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

16Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 10anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	24	9–15	38%	-0.03
dust2	B	20	10–10	50%	-0.01
overpass	A	13	8–5	62%	0.03
ancient	A	11	6–5	55%	0.00
nuke	S	10	7–3	70%	0.02
cache	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.01
anubis	D	7	2–5	29%	-0.00
inferno	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.04
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

13,504Lifetime kills

0.96K/D

876Matches

45.4%Match win rate

40.5%Headshot %

10.1%Shot accuracy

1,478MVPs

332Hours (in match)

987Bombs planted

199Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

M4A4 / M4A1-S3,569

AK-473,563

AWP1,096

P2000 / USP-S753

Galil AR488

Glock-18438

UMP-45431

Desert Eagle328

FAMAS327

MAC-10299

Lifetime map wins

1,365dust2

770nuke

725inferno

451train

208vertigo

183cbble

85italy

65office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

4Matches

25%Win rate

0.81Avg K/D

68.2ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy

34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.4%Spray accuracy

67.2%Counter-strafing

7.9°Preaim

618msReaction time

35.6%T opening success

39.1%CT opening success

0.70Enemies flashed / flash

1.5%Flash assists

7.63HE damage / grenade

6.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.6119% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	7–13	-0.01	12%	11 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.08	18%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.09	17%	2 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.07	15%	15 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.03	20%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	23%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.06	18%	11 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.02	3%	2 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.07	5%	2 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	18%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	15%	29 Jun →
overpass	13–8	0.04	23%	27 Jun →
inferno	7–13	0.01	13%	27 Jun →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	12%	25 Jun →
overpass	4–13	-0.03	13%	25 Jun →
anubis	7–13	-0.00	11%	25 Jun →
dust2	13–16	-0.05	20%	25 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.10	11%	24 Jun →
nuke	3–1	0.03	29%	24 Jun →
mirage	15–15	-0.04	18%	24 Jun →
overpass	13–11	0.03	12%	24 Jun →
vertigo	10–13	0.03	17%	24 Jun →
cache	13–11	-0.02	14%	24 Jun →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	16%	23 Jun →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	13%	23 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.11	8%	22 Jun →
ancient	15–15	0.05	21%	22 Jun →
mirage	15–15	0.03	14%	22 Jun →
inferno	2–9	-0.14	4%	22 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.04	20%	20 Jun →
nuke	16–13	0.02	22%	20 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	16%	19 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.01	14%	19 Jun →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	5%	19 Jun →
ancient	9–13	0.04	13%	19 Jun →
inferno	3–13	-0.09	22%	19 Jun →
dust2	9–13	0.02	20%	18 Jun →
overpass	3–13	0.01	12%	18 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.04	14%	18 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	12%	18 Jun →
overpass	5–13	0.00	15%	18 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.05	27%	18 Jun →
nuke	9–13	0.03	13%	16 Jun →
overpass	13–9	0.05	16%	16 Jun →
overpass	16–12	0.09	18%	16 Jun →
mirage	8–2	0.00	8%	14 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.01	20%	14 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.01	12%	13 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	12%	13 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.03	15%	13 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.01	11%	13 Jun →
mirage	13–16	-0.07	6%	12 Jun →
ancient	13–4	-0.05	11%	11 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.06	10%	11 Jun →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	12%	10 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.10	10%	10 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.06	23%	10 Jun →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	17%	10 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	10%	10 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.01	18%	9 Jun →
mirage	16–13	0.01	15%	8 Jun →
anubis	16–12	0.05	11%	6 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.02	10%	5 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.06	18%	4 Jun →
overpass	11–13	0.11	23%	4 Jun →
mirage	1–13	-0.05	11%	3 Jun →
overpass	13–6	-0.07	15%	3 Jun →
nuke	13–7	0.07	8%	2 Jun →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	12%	2 Jun →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	17%	1 Jun →
anubis	13–10	-0.03	9%	1 Jun →
overpass	16–14	0.01	18%	1 Jun →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	8%	26 May →
cache	13–3	0.03	18%	25 May →
anubis	9–13	0.04	14%	24 May →
dust2	15–15	0.03	17%	24 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	17%	23 May →
overpass	11–13	0.00	18%	23 May →
dust2	14–16	-0.05	9%	23 May →
ancient	13–7	0.03	18%	23 May →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	5%	23 May →
cache	12–12	-0.01	18%	22 May →
nuke	2–13	-0.04	15%	22 May →
cache	13–6	-0.05	16%	22 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	20%	22 May →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	13%	21 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	18%	21 May →
mirage	15–15	-0.05	15%	21 May →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	22%	21 May →
cache	9–13	-0.03	12%	20 May →
overpass	13–11	0.04	16%	19 May →
dust2	16–14	-0.05	20%	19 May →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	15%	18 May →
ancient	13–3	0.06	9%	18 May →
nuke	13–8	0.05	16%	17 May →
overpass	9–6	0.09	15%	17 May →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	13%	17 May →
dust2	13–11	-0.08	17%	17 May →
dust2	13–9	0.04	24%	17 May →
mirage	10–13	0.03	13%	16 May →