IAMCHOCCYMILKDRINKER49 — CS2 Stats

JP76561198126515563[U:1:166249835]Steam profile ↗

1,350Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,551Hours in CS

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,999Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#3173 of 21383 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,204 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

24,999Peak Premier on CSDB

2,204Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,204
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 296 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 24,999
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	46.8%	52.8%
Shot accuracy	14.2%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.00	1.08
Match win rate	46.8%	49.2%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning65

Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD54–44–2Last 10054%Win rateWLLLWTWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.3

Aggression9.8

Utility4.7

Positioning6.5

Opening Duels5.1

Clutch6.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 42% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning6.5

Utility4.7

Mechanics8.2

Opening Duels5.1

Win Impact6.2

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time633ms+15ms

first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 633ms

Headshot accuracy27.6%+3.5%

first ⅓ avg 24.1% → last ⅓ avg 27.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — dust2 13–3

13–1Biggest win — anubis

6Longest win streak

13–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	32	19–13	59%	0.02
mirage	A	24	14–10	58%	0.01
cache	C	14	6–8	43%	0.02
anubis	D	12	4–8	33%	0.02
inferno	S	5	4–1	80%	0.03
overpass	—	4	3–1	75%	0.01
ancient	—	4	2–2	50%	0.02
nuke	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

158,546Lifetime kills

1.00K/D

4,902Matches

46.8%Match win rate

46.8%Headshot %

14.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 10 players

14,625MVPs

3,551Hours (in match)

4,794Bombs planted

1,675Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4745,629

AWP33,967

M4A4 / M4A1-S17,852

Desert Eagle12,153

P2000 / USP-S9,268

Glock-186,173

Tec-94,193

P2503,376

UMP-453,364

Knife2,616

Lifetime map wins

26,742dust2

10,508inferno

2,170train

1,755nuke

673vertigo

297cbble

277office

79lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

487Matches

54%Win rate

1.24Avg K/D

86.8ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

53%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	43	63%	1.38	18.6
Dust2	39	56%	1.22	18.7
Anubis	20	50%	1.47	19.1
Ancient	10	40%	1.20	17.8
Inferno	6	67%	1.32	18.7
Cache	6	50%	1.63	20.5
Nuke	5	0%	1.10	22.0
Vertigo	4	75%	1.08	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.6%Headshot accuracy

33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.0%Spray accuracy

86.8%Counter-strafing

8.6°Preaim

617msReaction time

42.3%T opening success

58.8%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

8.4%Flash assists

7.13HE damage / grenade

10.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4653 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–6	0.04	19%	24 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.05	35%	24 Aug →
inferno	4–13	0.04	36%	19 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.05	26%	11 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.02	31%	11 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.02	33%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.00	34%	10 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.03	19%	9 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.02	32%	9 Aug →
cache	13–16	0.06	32%	27 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.05	21%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	28%	25 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.06	21%	24 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.03	23%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.08	30%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.06	26%	23 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.05	7%	23 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.02	35%	17 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.02	28%	16 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	21%	16 Jul →
debris	7–9	-0.06	29%	16 Jul →
cache	4–13	0.03	18%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.02	18%	15 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.02	39%	14 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.09	25%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.06	21%	12 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.05	52%	10 Jul →
cache	14–16	0.04	29%	9 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.03	24%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.01	19%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.08	35%	9 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.07	30%	9 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.07	32%	7 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.05	29%	7 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	33%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	20%	6 Jul →
overpass	13–9	0.08	37%	6 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.05	22%	6 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	20%	6 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	12%	6 Jul →
overpass	19–16	0.01	29%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.02	20%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.03	10%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.05	16%	5 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.02	14%	5 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	12%	5 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.03	28%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.03	23%	4 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	25%	4 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	14%	4 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.00	14%	3 Jul →
dust2	3–13	0.04	17%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	20%	2 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.01	8%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.06	23%	29 Jun →
overpass	10–13	-0.01	18%	29 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.06	26%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.02	13%	29 Jun →
vertigo	9–6	0.00	15%	29 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.15	28%	29 Jun →
anubis	1–13	0.02	41%	29 Jun →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	27%	28 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.06	50%	28 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	34%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–4	0.04	16%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–4	-0.04	25%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.01	29%	27 Jun →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	17%	24 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.00	17%	24 Jun →
ancient	11–13	0.08	22%	22 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	15%	22 Jun →
dust2	3–13	0.04	23%	22 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	21%	22 Jun →
inferno	13–4	0.09	33%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–4	-0.00	26%	22 Jun →
dust2	16–14	-0.01	15%	22 Jun →
anubis	13–1	0.11	48%	21 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	16%	21 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.00	15%	21 Jun →
dust2	16–14	0.07	21%	21 Jun →
nuke	20–22	0.04	25%	21 Jun →
dust2	1–13	-0.11	8%	19 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.16	31%	19 Jun →
anubis	11–13	0.03	31%	18 Jun →
overpass	13–11	-0.04	19%	18 Jun →
dust2	13–16	-0.03	31%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.15	36%	18 Jun →
dust2	17–19	0.07	30%	15 Jun →
cache	8–13	-0.03	30%	15 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.02	29%	15 Jun →
inferno	13–1	0.04	28%	15 Jun →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	28%	15 Jun →
anubis	13–4	0.02	33%	13 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	19%	13 Jun →
mirage	19–17	0.01	26%	12 Jun →
inferno	13–2	-0.01	19%	12 Jun →
anubis	13–4	0.04	22%	12 Jun →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	20%	11 Jun →
anubis	12–16	0.05	21%	9 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.04	21%	8 Jun →