PolarPop

PolarPop — CS2 Stats

76561198121065110[U:1:160799382]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

140Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
931Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.4 Learning
Premier CS Rating4,627Grey band · top ~80.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#25781 of 33383 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=404), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianvs Light Blue band
Headshot rate33.0%40.1%7.1% short
Shot accuracy13.4%7.6%above
Kill/death ratio0.990.92above
Match win rate37.3%42.2%4.9% short

This profile matches the typical Light Blue band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Light Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPolarPopPREMIER4,627 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim31
Positioning43
Utility26

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51463Last 10051%Win rateWLLLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.1
Aggression2.6
Utility2.6
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 660ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.1
Positioning4.3
Utility2.6
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact7.4

Composite 3.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time670ms−50ms
first ⅓ avg 720ms → last ⅓ avg 670ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+4.9%
first ⅓ avg 12.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–2
131Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 59% over 29anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA29171259%0.01
dust2A26151158%-0.02
nukeA1911858%-0.00
ancientD123925%-0.01
cacheB63350%-0.03
anubisD51420%-0.05
inferno31233%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

16,720Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
934Matches
37.3%Match win rate
33.0%Headshot %
13.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
1,562MVPs
340Hours (in match)
1,158Bombs planted
180Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,507dust2
595inferno
298nuke
58train
40cbble
34lake
17safehouse
11office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
26.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
23.9%Spray accuracy
73.6%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
660msReaction time
17.6%T opening success
40.0%CT opening success
0.25Enemies flashed / flash
0.9%Flash assists
5.72HE damage / grenade
2.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2516 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.6322% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–3-0.0013%29 Aug
cache8–13-0.0610%28 Aug
dust27–13-0.0513%28 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0216%27 Aug
ancient4–12-0.0920%27 Aug
nuke13–110.0718%26 Aug
mirage13–80.038%26 Aug
dust213–7-0.0415%26 Aug
cache13–10-0.0120%25 Aug
nuke13–100.017%25 Aug
ancient13–40.0326%23 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0118%23 Aug
mirage4–130.0039%23 Aug
nuke15–150.0324%20 Aug
nuke13–90.0524%7 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0532%6 Aug
cache13–7-0.0216%5 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0127%31 Jul
cache15–15-0.0211%31 Jul
mirage13–70.0212%29 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0515%28 Jul
dust216–14-0.0510%28 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0220%27 Jul
mirage6–13-0.1111%26 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0618%26 Jul
ancient10–13-0.068%24 Jul
dust213–10-0.0615%22 Jul
dust213–7-0.0117%21 Jul
cache9–13-0.0337%17 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0421%16 Jul
mirage13–90.0216%16 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0313%9 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0414%8 Jul
inferno4–13-0.098%7 Jul
cache13–7-0.0216%7 Jul
dust213–50.0323%7 Jul
dust24–13-0.0515%2 Jul
dust213–8-0.0611%2 Jul
anubis8–130.0110%27 Jun
mirage13–16-0.0114%26 Jun
inferno6–4-0.057%24 Jun
anubis13–16-0.0711%24 Jun
dust213–10-0.0320%23 Jun
dust213–60.0119%23 Jun
dust28–13-0.1011%22 Jun
nuke9–130.0016%20 Jun
ancient6–130.0413%20 Jun
dust28–13-0.0220%18 Jun
mirage13–20.0612%18 Jun
dust211–13-0.0715%17 Jun
dust27–13-0.047%17 Jun
mirage13–1-0.003%16 Jun
nuke13–110.0614%16 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0626%15 Jun
mirage13–110.0017%14 Jun
mirage13–110.0215%9 Jun
dust213–100.0118%8 Jun
dust213–16-0.056%8 Jun
mirage13–10-0.029%8 Jun
mirage13–100.0712%6 Jun
dust213–20.059%6 Jun
ancient8–130.028%3 Jun
mirage8–13-0.056%3 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0930%2 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0413%2 Jun
dust213–10-0.0026%30 May
mirage13–3-0.0124%30 May
anubis10–13-0.0511%29 May
nuke13–50.0626%29 May
nuke13–4-0.026%28 May
ancient10–130.0318%28 May
mirage13–50.0824%28 May
mirage11–130.0611%28 May
mirage13–50.0320%27 May
mirage15–15-0.017%27 May
nuke11–13-0.0515%27 May
dust212–16-0.0510%26 May
nuke9–13-0.064%26 May
nuke5–13-0.017%25 May
dust213–70.0314%25 May
ancient13–70.0716%25 May
mirage16–120.0513%24 May
dust213–10-0.0320%24 May
mirage11–13-0.038%24 May
mirage13–20.1313%24 May
mirage13–90.0312%23 May
nuke13–80.036%23 May
mirage4–13-0.034%23 May
nuke13–70.0419%22 May
dust214–160.0318%22 May
nuke13–100.0317%21 May
dust27–13-0.0115%21 May
ancient5–13-0.0515%20 May
dust213–50.0822%20 May
anubis1–13-0.085%19 May
nuke8–13-0.085%18 May
ancient3–13-0.0620%18 May
dust29–13-0.057%16 May
mirage13–40.0511%13 May
inferno2–50.025%12 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →