Metamate

Metamate — CS2 Stats

US76561198120459896[U:1:160194168]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

202Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since
839Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPassive Rifler
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning49
Utility4

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52462Last 10052%Win rateLLWLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9
Aggression4.3
Utility0.4
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 631ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.9
Utility0.4
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time648ms+29ms
first ⅓ avg 619ms → last ⅓ avg 648ms
Headshot accuracy19.3%−2.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — office 8–13
131Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB21101148%0.01
infernoS2015575%0.02
ancientC1971237%-0.00
dust2D82625%0.01
nukeD72529%0.02
overpassS75271%0.02
cacheB63350%-0.00
trainS65183%0.03
anubis42250%-0.03
office1010%0.14
vertigo110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

49,594Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
2,057Matches
37.6%Match win rate
36.6%Headshot %
16.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
5,297MVPs
839Hours (in match)
1,437Bombs planted
491Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,802dust2
3,236inferno
503train
288cbble
233nuke
164vertigo
57office
53lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

22Matches
55%Win rate
1.39Avg K/D
98.3ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
43%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3100%1.8720.7
Dust2367%1.5722.7
Ancient333%1.8220.0
Cache250%1.3412.0
Vertigo10%1.1425.0
Nuke10%0.9623.0
Inferno1100%1.5323.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.1%Spray accuracy
84.6%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
631msReaction time
26.0%T opening success
41.5%CT opening success
0.03Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
2.01HE damage / grenade
0.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.0298 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.9805% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache1–9-0.0222%11 Aug
dust212–16-0.0213%9 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0215%9 Aug
cache8–13-0.0417%9 Aug
inferno13–60.0919%9 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0116%3 Aug
dust28–130.0514%3 Aug
cache13–90.0016%2 Aug
inferno13–60.0113%2 Aug
mirage13–70.0125%1 Aug
nuke10–130.0616%1 Aug
inferno13–80.0615%1 Aug
anubis13–80.0225%1 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0423%1 Aug
cache13–11-0.0314%1 Aug
train13–90.0912%1 Aug
inferno13–90.0335%13 Jun
cache13–70.0425%13 Jun
dust213–20.0913%10 May
cache5–130.0417%10 May
ancient11–13-0.0415%5 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0624%5 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0121%5 Aug
inferno13–100.0421%3 Aug
dust28–13-0.0518%1 Aug
train13–90.0324%31 Jul
overpass13–10-0.0115%31 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0021%31 Jul
overpass13–50.0616%31 Jul
overpass13–60.0819%31 Jul
inferno13–90.0524%26 Jul
mirage13–110.0522%26 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0235%20 Jul
inferno13–110.0213%20 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0823%20 Jul
mirage9–130.0110%20 Jul
ancient13–40.0623%20 Jul
mirage11–130.0335%20 Jul
mirage3–130.0823%20 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0321%20 Jul
inferno13–50.0725%20 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0326%20 Jul
overpass1–13-0.0525%20 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0126%19 Jul
overpass5–13-0.0210%19 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0121%19 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0120%19 Jul
inferno13–60.0426%17 Jul
overpass16–14-0.0318%17 Jul
mirage13–80.0123%17 Jul
ancient13–110.0021%17 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0613%17 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0231%14 Jul
mirage13–90.0326%14 Jul
mirage13–80.0033%14 Jul
ancient11–130.0321%14 Jul
train13–100.0121%13 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0129%13 Jul
inferno9–40.0426%13 Jul
ancient13–110.0715%13 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0620%13 Jul
ancient7–130.0220%13 Jul
mirage16–12-0.0132%13 Jul
anubis13–80.0119%13 Jul
inferno14–160.0118%12 Jul
train16–14-0.0033%12 Jul
mirage16–120.0722%12 Jul
inferno13–110.0124%2 Jul
ancient13–70.0415%2 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0614%2 Jul
ancient13–90.0030%1 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0016%1 Jul
train13–70.1031%1 Jul
nuke9–130.0233%1 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0024%1 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0816%30 Jun
ancient16–14-0.0119%30 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0218%30 Jun
train8–13-0.0318%30 Jun
ancient11–130.0111%30 Jun
dust22–13-0.0721%30 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0417%30 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0620%29 Jun
nuke13–100.0425%24 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0216%1 Jun
ancient7–130.0232%1 Jun
mirage6–130.0122%27 Sept
mirage1–60.0438%25 Aug
dust210–130.0230%24 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0728%21 Jul
inferno13–10.088%12 Jul
office8–130.1430%12 Jul
nuke13–100.0716%8 Jul
inferno13–50.0324%8 Jul
overpass13–40.1220%8 Jul
dust213–6-0.0025%25 Jun
vertigo13–70.0729%23 May
dust26–130.0319%14 May
mirage9–13-0.0018%14 May
inferno13–90.0019%6 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →