Sonkei — CS2 Stats

76561198119564557[U:1:159298829]

1,077Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,898Hours in CS22Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,000Purple band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9480 of 14662 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate30.1%48.1%18.0% short
Shot accuracy14.6%12.9%above
Kill/death ratio1.271.08above
Match win rate47.1%46.5%meets

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSonkeiPREMIER15,000 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning36
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT48484Last 10048%Win rateLWWWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.3
Aggression1.8
Utility6.9
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning3.6
Utility6.9
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels0.2
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time530ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 537ms → last ⅓ avg 530ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 13.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 13–8
132Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
48In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 10infernoWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B31161552%0.02
infernoD1861233%0.02
mirageC167944%0.01
cacheB147750%0.02
nukeA106460%0.02
anubisA74357%0.02
ancient31233%-0.05
overpass110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

79,432Lifetime kills
1.27K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
4,854Matches
47.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
30.1%Headshot %
14.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
7,907MVPs
1,764Hours (in match)
6,724Bombs planted
1,624Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4719,488
AWP14,484
AUG2,619
SG 5532,360
MP92,141
MAC-102,111
P2501,870

Lifetime map wins

15,526dust2
4,946inferno
1,792nuke
1,307train
1,295vertigo
491office
342cbble
175italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
76.8%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
526msReaction time
23.6%T opening success
31.5%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
12.28HE damage / grenade
14.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.6177% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–13-0.0819%28 Aug
dust213–90.0521%28 Aug
dust213–110.0113%27 Aug
anubis13–50.0118%27 Aug
dust25–13-0.0212%26 Aug
dust213–100.0420%26 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0211%26 Aug
mirage13–60.0823%23 Aug
inferno13–80.0319%23 Aug
inferno13–60.0319%23 Aug
cache13–7-0.0110%23 Aug
mirage9–13-0.019%22 Aug
inferno11–130.0720%22 Aug
cache12–16-0.0113%22 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0115%22 Aug
inferno11–130.0623%22 Aug
dust213–20.0416%22 Aug
mirage13–80.0714%22 Aug
cache13–5-0.0014%21 Aug
inferno9–130.0622%16 Aug
inferno13–50.036%16 Aug
anubis13–50.056%16 Aug
dust211–13-0.0218%16 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0511%16 Aug
dust213–3-0.0043%15 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0310%14 Aug
dust215–150.0112%14 Aug
inferno13–90.0810%12 Aug
mirage10–130.0415%12 Aug
cache11–13-0.0113%12 Aug
nuke15–150.0420%10 Aug
dust213–80.1123%10 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0323%9 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0325%9 Aug
mirage13–100.0821%9 Aug
dust216–130.0517%9 Aug
dust20–13-0.0725%9 Aug
inferno1–9-0.066%9 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0115%9 Aug
cache13–20.0814%9 Aug
mirage13–70.0518%9 Aug
dust24–13-0.0115%9 Aug
mirage8–130.0115%9 Aug
cache13–40.076%9 Aug
anubis13–30.0614%8 Aug
dust213–70.0619%8 Aug
inferno13–160.0617%8 Aug
mirage3–13-0.060%8 Aug
dust29–130.0216%7 Aug
inferno15–150.038%2 Aug
dust213–30.039%2 Aug
dust213–90.075%2 Aug
inferno13–60.0213%2 Aug
cache13–50.1211%31 Jul
inferno14–160.0118%28 Jul
cache10–130.038%26 Jul
dust25–13-0.0611%26 Jul
mirage9–130.0213%26 Jul
dust28–13-0.038%26 Jul
anubis7–130.0313%25 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0710%24 Jul
dust22–130.0017%24 Jul
cache5–130.0117%20 Jul
cache6–130.0519%19 Jul
cache16–120.0429%19 Jul
dust210–130.0320%18 Jul
cache10–13-0.0212%18 Jul
mirage15–15-0.025%18 Jul
mirage13–100.0118%17 Jul
dust213–80.0122%17 Jul
cache13–11-0.0321%16 Jul
mirage13–40.0814%13 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0711%12 Jul
dust213–80.0720%12 Jul
dust213–100.029%11 Jul
cache7–13-0.0818%11 Jul
dust210–13-0.036%11 Jul
dust216–130.0514%5 Jul
overpass13–110.0417%5 Jul
dust210–13-0.0417%12 Jun
nuke13–11-0.019%7 Jun
anubis5–130.0213%7 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0111%3 Jun
inferno11–13-0.028%1 Jun
dust27–130.0221%24 May
dust28–13-0.049%23 May
nuke11–13-0.0615%16 May
nuke13–70.0124%16 May
inferno13–80.0111%16 May
anubis16–13-0.057%15 May
nuke13–70.0816%13 May
nuke4–13-0.028%10 May
dust213–80.1416%10 May
inferno3–13-0.019%9 May
nuke13–70.0717%9 May
dust29–130.0111%7 May
inferno8–130.0612%6 May
dust213–6-0.0017%3 May
nuke13–10-0.018%3 May
nuke13–90.1110%1 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →