Element

Element — CS2 Stats

DE76561198098521184[U:1:138255456]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

442Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,424Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,022), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate46.8%46.2%47.2%meets
Shot accuracy16.1%12.5%12.3%above
Kill/death ratio1.201.061.07above
Match win rate45.7%45.9%46.3%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 8 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGElementFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning50
Utility19

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY543511Last 10054%Win rateLWLWWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.2
Aggression7.2
Utility1.9
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.8

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 682ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.0
Utility1.9
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time689ms+103ms
first ⅓ avg 586ms → last ⅓ avg 689ms
Headshot accuracy23.2%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.39Best rating — overpass 9–0
132Biggest win — basalt
6Longest win streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 9dust2Weakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
vertigoA29171259%0.01
dust2C145936%-0.02
overpassA148657%0.06
nukeB105550%0.07
mirageS96367%-0.01
infernoA95456%0.03
trainC52340%0.00
anubis21150%-0.04
palais220100%0.06
basalt220100%0.14
whistle110100%0.02
office1010%0.02
mills1010%-0.08
thera1010%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

76,263Lifetime kills
1.20K/D · Top 25% of Level 7 players
3,795Matches
45.7%Match win rate
46.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
16.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 7 players
10,122MVPs
1,424Hours (in match)
2,352Bombs planted
598Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,585
AWP13,605
P2501,949
SSG 081,516
Tec-91,135

Lifetime map wins

6,362dust2
1,508inferno
1,256vertigo
992nuke
915train
848cbble
247office
157assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

90Matches
60%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1060%1.2314.5
Mirage683%1.2011.2
Vertigo560%0.9910.8
Overpass540%1.2821.4
Ancient367%0.8010.7
Dust2367%1.2120.3
Nuke250%1.3820.0
Inferno10%1.0016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy
30.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.0%Spray accuracy
88.6%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
682msReaction time
33.6%T opening success
49.0%CT opening success
0.31Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
12.12HE damage / grenade
2.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3132 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.5806% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0618%23 Apr
mirage13–60.0629%23 Apr
overpass10–130.0327%6 Mar
dust213–60.0817%6 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0311%6 Mar
dust24–13-0.0714%31 Aug
dust210–13-0.0236%23 May
anubis7–13-0.0619%1 Mar
dust28–13-0.046%28 Feb
vertigo9–30.0529%27 Feb
whistle9–20.023%27 Feb
train13–9-0.0111%27 Feb
dust213–9-0.0317%27 Feb
anubis16–13-0.0322%23 Feb
train6–13-0.0321%23 Feb
train7–130.0733%16 Feb
palais9–40.1429%16 Feb
overpass7–90.0116%16 Feb
train5–13-0.0214%16 Feb
dust23–11-0.0256%16 Feb
overpass13–60.0220%26 Jan
mirage13–40.0312%26 Jan
nuke13–80.0523%8 Jan
vertigo11–130.0227%8 Jan
overpass7–130.0221%3 Jan
basalt13–30.1453%3 Jan
basalt13–20.1529%30 Dec
mirage12–12-0.0321%30 Dec
dust210–13-0.1023%15 Dec
mirage3–13-0.0411%15 Dec
train13–8-0.0032%15 Nov
palais9–2-0.0322%15 Nov
office7–130.0246%20 Oct
vertigo13–2-0.0217%16 Oct
vertigo11–130.0821%15 Oct
mirage12–12-0.0326%29 Sept
mills8–13-0.0823%26 Jun
thera10–130.0618%26 Jun
nuke13–30.1414%24 Jun
inferno2–9-0.1119%15 Jun
mirage13–70.0110%14 Jun
vertigo4–9-0.1723%13 Jun
vertigo9–70.0924%13 Jun
vertigo7–90.0115%7 Jun
vertigo9–70.0821%7 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0412%5 Jun
dust215–15-0.0415%5 Jun
overpass8–80.0431%5 Jun
vertigo12–12-0.0416%5 Jun
vertigo11–130.0236%4 Jun
mirage13–90.0027%4 Jun
dust26–13-0.0118%4 Jun
vertigo0–9-0.2513%30 May
vertigo8–80.038%25 May
inferno9–7-0.0324%22 May
vertigo13–90.0836%20 May
nuke15–150.0414%20 May
vertigo9–40.0217%18 May
dust213–40.0234%17 May
mirage13–8-0.0520%17 May
dust213–110.0243%17 May
vertigo9–40.0320%13 May
vertigo9–40.1824%13 May
vertigo8–80.0127%7 May
vertigo9–40.0311%7 May
vertigo9–40.1922%7 May
vertigo9–4-0.0217%7 May
inferno3–9-0.1825%6 May
inferno8–8-0.0216%2 May
overpass9–50.0515%2 May
vertigo9–7-0.0916%2 May
vertigo9–60.0731%2 May
nuke9–30.0617%2 May
inferno7–9-0.0918%2 May
overpass9–00.3917%2 May
vertigo9–4-0.098%2 May
inferno9–40.2044%2 May
vertigo9–30.0727%2 May
overpass2–9-0.0515%2 May
vertigo4–9-0.1228%1 May
overpass9–20.1027%1 May
vertigo9–10.2214%1 May
inferno9–10.1156%1 May
vertigo6–9-0.0023%1 May
overpass9–20.1547%1 May
nuke8–80.0320%1 May
inferno9–20.1743%1 May
overpass9–5-0.0121%1 May
dust213–11-0.009%29 Apr
overpass6–9-0.1229%29 Apr
nuke3–9-0.0938%29 Apr
vertigo15–15-0.0325%28 Apr
dust211–13-0.0123%28 Apr
inferno9–00.2219%26 Apr
nuke9–00.3520%26 Apr
nuke6–9-0.1318%25 Apr
overpass9–00.1716%25 Apr
vertigo9–6-0.1117%25 Apr
overpass9–30.080%25 Apr
nuke9–00.2921%25 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →