xns — CS2 Stats

PROTeam oNe eSportsBrazilRiflerSettings & gear profile →

76561198098407000[U:1:138141272]✓ No bans

1,613Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating25,120Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2386 of 16747 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxnsFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,120 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning54
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4753Last 10047%Win rateWWWLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.6
Aggression6.0
Utility5.2
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.4
Utility5.2
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time530ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 549ms → last ⅓ avg 530ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%−4.8%
first ⅓ avg 27.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 13–3
142Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
21Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 68% over 19nukeWeakest map · 26% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B25131252%0.00
mirageB1991047%0.00
infernoS1913668%0.01
nukeD1951426%-0.01
ancientB136746%0.00
anubis21150%0.02
overpass2020%0.02
train1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (26% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,398Matches
61%Win rate
1.38Avg K/D
75.8ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
21Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14862%1.3515.4
Ancient7751%1.3215.3
Dust27057%1.2213.7
Anubis6351%1.2914.7
Nuke5252%1.0814.8
Inferno2763%1.2115.4
Vertigo1580%1.7716.1
Overpass475%2.9117.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$9Inventory value22ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
MP7 | Just Smile (Minimal Wear)$1StatTrak™ Tec-9 | Brother (Battle-Scarred)$1XM1014 | Irezumi (Factory New)$1Dual Berettas | Flora Carnivora (Field-Tested)$1Five-SeveN | Hybrid (Field-Tested)$1M4A4 | Etch Lord (Well-Worn)$1

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
525msReaction time
29.0%T opening success
48.6%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
8.63HE damage / grenade
11.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.428 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.0272% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

26% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–20.0437%4 May
inferno13–30.1224%4 May
dust213–90.0114%3 May
mirage14–16-0.0224%3 May
ancient6–13-0.0113%3 May
inferno19–17-0.0126%30 Apr
ancient13–60.0117%30 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0226%30 Apr
nuke4–130.0222%29 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0231%29 Apr
dust210–13-0.0221%7 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0334%7 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0315%2 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0317%2 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0215%30 Mar
dust28–13-0.0525%30 Mar
dust28–130.0222%22 Mar
dust213–90.0122%20 Mar
nuke16–14-0.0224%20 Mar
mirage13–30.0012%18 Mar
dust23–13-0.0933%18 Mar
ancient8–130.0628%18 Mar
inferno16–140.0321%16 Mar
dust213–9-0.0223%16 Mar
mirage13–100.0718%13 Mar
dust213–40.0215%13 Mar
nuke22–20-0.0226%23 Jan
mirage13–16-0.0027%23 Jan
dust26–13-0.0317%23 Jan
dust29–6-0.0040%19 Jan
nuke7–130.0126%19 Jan
mirage16–12-0.0213%19 Jan
inferno13–40.0330%16 Jan
dust213–30.1027%16 Jan
anubis10–130.0333%16 Jan
dust213–11-0.0137%15 Jan
anubis13–110.0224%15 Jan
mirage6–130.0124%18 Dec
inferno8–13-0.0210%18 Dec
inferno6–13-0.0327%17 Oct
dust27–13-0.0523%17 Oct
mirage16–130.0529%16 Oct
inferno13–90.0323%16 Oct
dust213–110.1125%13 Oct
ancient19–170.0226%13 Oct
mirage2–13-0.0223%13 Oct
nuke17–190.0323%11 Oct
inferno13–80.0117%11 Oct
dust214–20.0720%11 Oct
dust27–13-0.0124%9 Oct
ancient9–13-0.0022%9 Oct
dust213–5-0.0121%6 Oct
inferno13–30.0616%6 Oct
overpass8–13-0.0120%6 Oct
nuke10–13-0.0225%25 Sept
inferno5–130.0035%25 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0617%14 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0421%14 Sept
inferno13–6-0.025%14 Sept
mirage13–70.0115%12 Sept
inferno19–16-0.0314%12 Sept
ancient5–130.0027%11 Sept
inferno14–16-0.0125%11 Sept
nuke9–130.0120%10 Sept
train10–130.0312%10 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0219%9 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0320%9 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0130%9 Sept
nuke4–130.0233%8 Sept
ancient16–130.0516%6 Sept
nuke19–160.0023%6 Sept
nuke13–16-0.0131%5 Sept
overpass12–160.0433%5 Sept
mirage12–16-0.0217%16 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0234%1 Aug
ancient13–60.0117%31 Jul
mirage5–130.0026%31 Jul
dust25–13-0.0433%31 Jul
nuke3–00.00100%29 Jul
mirage13–50.0315%29 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0222%29 Jul
dust216–120.0329%29 Jul
dust216–14-0.0029%26 Jul
mirage13–100.0327%26 Jul
dust27–13-0.0142%25 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0412%25 Jul
mirage11–130.0024%25 Jul
inferno16–140.0225%25 Jul
dust26–13-0.0813%25 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0610%25 Jul
dust213–90.0642%25 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0722%22 Jul
dust29–13-0.0419%22 Jul
nuke13–90.0219%22 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0522%22 Jul
dust29–130.0329%22 Jul
inferno13–80.0845%19 Jul
ancient13–70.0816%19 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0341%11 Jul
nuke9–130.0220%11 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →