souz4h

souz4h — CS2 Stats

76561198362812806[U:1:402547078]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,882Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,365 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsouz4hFACEITLevel 10 · 3,365 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning59
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT5347Last 10053%Win rateWWLLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.5
Aggression5.5
Utility4.7
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.9
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time574ms+40ms
first ⅓ avg 534ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy25.9%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 24.9% → last ⅓ avg 25.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — mirage 13–5
131Biggest win — anubis
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 65% over 20nukeWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28151354%0.04
dust2A25141156%-0.02
infernoS2013765%0.02
ancientC114736%0.00
nukeD81713%-0.04
anubis43175%0.04
cache330100%0.05
overpass1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,329Matches
59%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
86.7ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
21Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage127657%1.2918.2
Ancient33960%1.2316.8
Anubis25253%1.2517.7
Dust223649%1.1916.9
Nuke10650%1.2316.7
Vertigo7364%1.4419.7
Inferno4850%1.0915.7
Overpass3768%1.3217.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.6%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
542msReaction time
27.9%T opening success
48.2%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
6.58HE damage / grenade
11.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4945 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.8591% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–60.0626%26 Aug
mirage13–20.0822%26 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0535%11 Aug
dust210–13-0.0524%11 Aug
inferno13–20.0943%9 Aug
dust21–0-0.220%9 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0627%9 Aug
dust213–10-0.0134%9 Aug
inferno13–20.0943%9 Aug
dust21–0-0.220%9 Aug
dust213–10-0.0134%9 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0627%9 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0115%7 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0716%7 Aug
dust27–13-0.0522%6 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0613%6 Aug
inferno22–18-0.0121%4 Aug
cache13–100.0518%4 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0230%4 Aug
mirage13–30.0628%3 Aug
cache13–110.0322%3 Aug
ancient13–20.0739%1 Aug
mirage16–190.0322%19 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0121%2 Jul
mirage17–190.0430%28 Jun
dust27–0-0.0150%27 Jun
mirage13–50.2335%27 Jun
dust213–20.1041%27 Jun
dust213–70.0515%26 Jun
mirage5–130.0329%26 Jun
mirage19–220.0316%12 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0118%11 Jun
mirage13–40.1436%11 Jun
inferno7–130.0719%10 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0323%10 Jun
mirage13–20.0928%4 May
inferno13–30.0530%4 May
dust213–9-0.0314%3 May
mirage14–16-0.0120%3 May
ancient6–13-0.0426%3 May
mirage13–110.0526%2 May
inferno19–170.0222%30 Apr
ancient13–60.0330%30 Apr
nuke11–130.0226%30 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0035%29 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0547%29 Apr
cache13–80.0720%27 Apr
mirage5–130.1234%27 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0324%26 Apr
mirage13–100.0614%22 Apr
mirage10–130.1131%16 Apr
ancient1–130.0442%16 Apr
dust210–13-0.0722%7 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0424%7 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0117%2 Apr
inferno13–90.0514%2 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0119%30 Mar
dust28–130.0120%30 Mar
dust28–130.0623%22 Mar
dust213–90.0440%20 Mar
nuke16–14-0.0517%20 Mar
mirage13–30.0631%18 Mar
dust23–13-0.0817%18 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0311%18 Mar
inferno16–140.0218%16 Mar
dust213–90.0333%16 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0218%13 Mar
dust213–40.0515%13 Mar
anubis13–70.0821%12 Mar
inferno3–13-0.0419%11 Mar
dust25–13-0.0542%7 Mar
dust219–220.0635%6 Mar
mirage13–70.0717%6 Mar
dust213–60.0415%1 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0313%1 Mar
overpass10–130.0230%1 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0033%27 Feb
inferno19–160.0129%27 Feb
nuke3–13-0.0633%26 Feb
inferno13–70.0219%26 Feb
dust28–130.0326%26 Feb
ancient17–190.0121%25 Feb
inferno13–60.0728%25 Feb
dust210–13-0.0419%25 Feb
dust222–20-0.0322%23 Feb
ancient13–100.0526%23 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0125%17 Feb
mirage7–130.0132%9 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0428%8 Feb
anubis12–16-0.0233%8 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0424%5 Feb
dust24–13-0.0231%5 Feb
ancient16–12-0.0114%5 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0519%5 Feb
dust213–70.0318%5 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0427%5 Feb
mirage11–130.0124%4 Feb
anubis13–10.0720%22 Jan
anubis13–90.0227%21 Jan
inferno13–40.1336%16 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →