Ashes

Ashes — CS2 Stats

US76561198094746569[U:1:134480841]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,844Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,415Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,297Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7602 of 48179 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,563 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,762), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate44.9%46.1%47.0%2.1% short
Shot accuracy15.3%12.6%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.031.051.070.05 short
Match win rate51.8%45.7%46.4%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAshesFACEITLevel 7 · 1,563 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER24,297 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning38
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46513Last 10046%Win rateWLWLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4
Aggression2.9
Utility5.1
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch0.6

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 46 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning3.8
Utility5.1
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time594ms−78ms
first ⅓ avg 672ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy21.8%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — ancient 13–2
132Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 62% over 13mirageWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B20101050%-0.00
mirageD1861233%-0.01
infernoC167944%-0.03
cacheA138562%0.00
ancientC135838%-0.01
nukeC94544%-0.02
anubisC52340%-0.03
overpass43175%0.00
office21150%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

79,203Lifetime kills
1.03K/D
4,451Matches
51.8%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 7 players
44.9%Headshot %
15.3%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
10,008MVPs
1,937Hours (in match)
5,010Bombs planted
1,250Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,577
AWP4,855
FAMAS1,709
MP91,576
SSG 081,188

Lifetime map wins

6,972dust2
6,049inferno
1,695nuke
1,099vertigo
454train
142cbble
95office
23safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

336Matches
53%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
76.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

23%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1567%0.9416.5
Anubis1040%0.8914.6
Nuke743%0.9210.3
Ancient771%0.9816.0
Dust2650%1.3116.3
Inferno450%0.9215.8
Cache333%1.4720.0
Vertigo250%0.668.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
90.2%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
604msReaction time
23.5%T opening success
40.9%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
12.18HE damage / grenade
9.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4904 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.457% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–10-0.0214%26 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0618%23 Aug
cache13–5-0.0417%23 Aug
dust21–13-0.0028%23 Aug
dust20–130.000%23 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0330%19 Aug
cache11–13-0.0138%19 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0217%19 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0723%17 Aug
cache13–10-0.0123%17 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0346%12 Aug
anubis13–70.0015%12 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0814%10 Aug
cache15–150.0218%10 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0525%7 Aug
dust28–13-0.0814%7 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0620%7 Aug
ancient10–130.0122%7 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0627%5 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0820%5 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0717%5 Aug
office13–7-0.0050%2 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0624%2 Aug
cache16–140.0623%2 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0517%1 Aug
ancient13–20.1027%1 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0711%1 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0122%1 Aug
cache13–10-0.0414%31 Jul
dust213–9-0.0221%31 Jul
mirage11–13-0.027%31 Jul
nuke13–110.0119%30 Jul
office6–13-0.0740%30 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0016%26 Jul
mirage6–1-0.033%26 Jul
ancient13–80.0318%25 Jul
dust213–8-0.0615%24 Jul
ancient13–80.0124%22 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0120%22 Jul
overpass7–130.0316%19 Jul
cache13–70.0424%19 Jul
cache9–130.0322%18 Jul
dust213–60.0321%18 Jul
mirage13–110.0530%18 Jul
anubis5–13-0.1115%10 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0120%7 Jul
dust213–90.0420%6 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0911%6 Jul
overpass13–4-0.0416%4 Jul
ancient13–40.0116%4 Jul
overpass13–8-0.0321%21 Jun
nuke13–50.0011%21 Jun
inferno4–8-0.0345%21 Jun
nuke13–16-0.0332%21 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0413%21 Jun
mirage13–40.0225%17 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0118%16 Jun
inferno13–60.0113%15 Jun
dust213–16-0.0418%15 Jun
inferno13–100.0321%10 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0117%7 Jun
overpass13–20.0327%7 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0334%7 Jun
dust210–130.0619%6 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0113%6 Jun
dust26–13-0.0017%3 Jun
dust29–13-0.0416%3 Jun
dust213–6-0.0629%1 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0032%1 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0317%1 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0114%29 May
nuke13–70.0123%29 May
cache12–12-0.0121%24 May
mirage11–130.0129%24 May
ancient3–130.0114%24 May
cache13–60.0230%24 May
cache13–70.0121%23 May
mirage9–130.0429%13 May
dust28–13-0.0318%13 May
dust213–50.0733%13 May
dust212–10.0719%13 May
inferno1–9-0.008%13 May
mirage16–130.0319%12 May
inferno13–16-0.0327%6 May
nuke0–13-0.0515%6 May
dust213–80.0216%6 May
anubis13–90.0421%6 May
mirage10–13-0.0416%6 May
anubis7–13-0.0418%5 May
ancient9–13-0.0333%5 May
dust210–13-0.0120%1 May
ancient12–16-0.0425%1 May
cache10–13-0.0419%1 May
dust213–8-0.0119%26 Apr
dust215–150.0121%25 Apr
inferno13–100.0622%25 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0623%25 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0925%20 Apr
dust213–50.0221%20 Apr
mirage8–130.0315%20 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →