✪chawny

✪chawny — CS2 Stats

US76561198094145919[U:1:133880191]Steam profile ↗

338Tracked matches52%Win rate2025Tracked since
395Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating12,160Blue band · top ~43.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17951 of 25653 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate54.8%42.5%44.2%above
Shot accuracy10.0%10.9%11.2%1.2% short
Kill/death ratio2.100.991.04above
Match win rate46.5%44.2%45.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪chawnyFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER12,160 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning42
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51481Last 10051%Win rateLLLLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.3
Aggression2.3
Utility4.5
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch1.2

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 624ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.2
Utility4.5
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time631ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 661ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — dust2 9–1
131Biggest win — cache
5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
910In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6mirageWeakest map · 38% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC26101638%0.02
dust2A2113862%0.02
ancientB189950%0.01
nukeA159660%0.01
infernoC83538%0.02
cacheS64267%0.01
anubisB63350%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,205Lifetime kills
2.10K/D · Top 5% of Level 4 players
869Matches
46.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players
54.8%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 4 players
10.0%Shot accuracy
2,005MVPs
395Hours (in match)
927Bombs planted
291Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,154dust2
709nuke
670inferno
47cbble
44dust
43train
37office
29vertigo

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

21Matches
57%Win rate
1.45Avg K/D
90.3ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

26%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis450%1.3014.5
Cache450%1.0916.8
Mirage450%1.7019.0
Dust2367%1.9621.3
Ancient367%0.7212.7
Nuke2100%2.5422.0
Inferno10%1.0016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.8%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.8%Spray accuracy
89.5%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
624msReaction time
19.1%T opening success
44.3%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
6.86HE damage / grenade
6.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.785% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4851 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.0698% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache2–9-0.0822%23 Aug
nuke7–130.0116%23 Aug
inferno5–8-0.015%23 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0117%23 Aug
ancient13–9-0.017%23 Aug
dust213–10-0.0620%23 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0212%23 Aug
inferno13–90.0118%22 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0022%22 Aug
cache13–60.027%22 Aug
mirage15–150.0210%22 Aug
mirage13–90.0715%22 Aug
ancient1–130.0217%22 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0721%22 Aug
nuke13–90.0414%16 Aug
cache13–10.1415%16 Aug
dust213–7-0.0316%16 Aug
inferno14–160.0410%16 Aug
dust213–5-0.0114%16 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0211%16 Aug
mirage13–80.0313%16 Aug
nuke14–16-0.078%9 Aug
dust22–13-0.0328%9 Aug
anubis10–130.0112%9 Aug
dust213–30.1020%9 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0115%9 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0119%8 Aug
dust28–13-0.0314%8 Aug
anubis13–70.1025%8 Aug
nuke7–130.0515%8 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0425%2 Aug
ancient13–60.0119%2 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0123%2 Aug
dust213–20.0520%1 Aug
cache13–11-0.0114%1 Aug
anubis10–130.0320%1 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0231%1 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0019%1 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0116%30 Jul
dust210–130.0615%25 Jul
dust216–140.0411%25 Jul
mirage9–130.0214%19 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0412%19 Jul
dust213–90.0124%19 Jul
ancient13–100.0921%19 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0012%19 Jul
mirage13–40.1116%12 Jul
cache13–11-0.0217%12 Jul
ancient8–130.0112%12 Jul
nuke13–110.0015%12 Jul
nuke16–130.0312%11 Jul
cache6–13-0.0214%11 Jul
dust211–130.0323%11 Jul
mirage7–130.0219%11 Jul
ancient13–160.0119%11 Jul
anubis5–0-0.0125%11 Jul
inferno5–130.0517%2 Jul
mirage8–130.0724%2 Jul
dust213–30.0728%2 Jul
nuke11–20.0716%2 Jul
dust27–13-0.0515%28 Jun
mirage13–80.0516%28 Jun
mirage12–160.0321%27 Jun
mirage5–130.0717%27 Jun
nuke13–60.0014%27 Jun
inferno3–130.0621%27 Jun
mirage11–130.0513%27 Jun
ancient11–130.0415%27 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0214%21 Jun
dust27–13-0.0213%21 Jun
ancient13–110.0423%21 Jun
mirage13–50.0819%21 Jun
dust213–110.0617%21 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0112%21 Jun
ancient13–40.0618%21 Jun
dust213–70.0822%20 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0115%20 Jun
nuke6–130.0312%20 Jun
inferno5–130.0117%20 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0216%14 Jun
dust29–10.1726%14 Jun
ancient7–13-0.057%14 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0515%14 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0313%14 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0712%14 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0025%13 Jun
mirage4–90.0222%13 Jun
nuke13–70.1525%13 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0114%13 Jun
dust210–130.0223%13 Jun
dust213–100.0320%7 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0018%7 Jun
inferno13–100.0118%7 Jun
nuke13–90.0012%6 Jun
mirage11–130.0210%6 Jun
dust25–130.0023%6 Jun
dust213–100.0224%6 Jun
ancient13–60.0132%30 May
mirage13–20.1114%30 May
mirage13–60.0014%30 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →