david — CS2 Stats

76561198091128519[U:1:130862791]

398Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,253Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning64
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48457Last 10048%Win rateWLLWLWLLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9
Aggression10.0
Utility4.5
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels5.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 550ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.4
Utility4.5
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time555ms−66ms
first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms
Headshot accuracy20.9%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — mirage 13–7
132Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
53In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 21anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B27131448%0.03
mirageS2114767%0.03
ancientB115645%0.02
anubisD93633%-0.00
nukeB84450%0.03
overpassC73443%0.03
infernoD62433%0.02
vertigoA53260%-0.00
cache3030%-0.01
train31233%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

88,561Lifetime kills
1.18K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
3,734Matches
39.0%Match win rate
33.9%Headshot %
16.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
9,582MVPs
1,384Hours (in match)
2,288Bombs planted
667Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP20,069
AK-4715,019
P909,012
Knife3,189
SSG 082,335
UMP-451,918

Lifetime map wins

17,719dust2
1,680inferno
953nuke
844vertigo
428office
295train
173cbble
90lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
550msReaction time
38.5%T opening success
62.9%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
8.73HE damage / grenade
9.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.468 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.5264% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0720%24 Aug
dust210–13-0.0118%24 Aug
inferno8–130.0120%18 Aug
mirage13–70.2322%18 Aug
mirage10–130.1320%17 Aug
nuke13–60.1124%17 Aug
cache7–130.0221%16 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0117%16 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0723%15 Aug
train12–120.0212%15 Aug
dust213–90.1020%14 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0220%11 Aug
mirage16–140.0119%11 Aug
dust213–100.0535%10 Aug
dust210–13-0.0519%9 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0215%9 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0117%8 Aug
dust213–90.0321%28 Jul
dust213–70.1221%26 Jul
cache7–130.0321%19 Jul
anubis13–110.0215%27 May
anubis15–150.0620%13 May
cache4–13-0.0733%13 May
overpass11–13-0.0025%28 Apr
dust213–9-0.0622%27 Apr
nuke13–50.0827%27 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0210%27 Apr
overpass13–70.0626%26 Apr
dust210–130.0525%25 Apr
dust213–9-0.0020%25 Apr
nuke13–30.0226%22 Apr
dust215–150.0821%21 Apr
inferno7–130.0115%21 Apr
nuke16–120.0216%21 Apr
vertigo13–90.0225%13 Apr
vertigo13–9-0.046%10 Apr
anubis1–13-0.0627%7 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0322%7 Apr
anubis12–120.0224%7 Apr
mirage13–100.0431%2 Apr
nuke3–130.0027%2 Apr
dust213–100.0625%30 Mar
mirage10–130.0311%30 Mar
dust27–13-0.0010%30 Mar
inferno10–130.0623%30 Mar
overpass13–110.0819%26 Mar
dust26–130.0525%26 Mar
inferno4–130.0332%23 Mar
ancient13–70.1529%23 Mar
mirage13–60.0918%23 Mar
dust29–13-0.0124%26 Feb
dust213–80.1020%7 Jan
overpass12–16-0.0224%19 Nov
dust210–13-0.0215%19 Nov
dust215–150.0530%18 Nov
inferno13–110.0625%17 Nov
overpass13–160.0720%14 Nov
ancient4–13-0.0220%11 Nov
mirage10–40.0516%30 Oct
dust213–60.0935%30 Oct
overpass7–13-0.0112%29 Oct
overpass12–30.0421%12 Aug
anubis4–130.0013%18 Jun
dust26–130.0424%18 Jun
ancient13–90.0222%16 Jun
mirage13–60.0113%16 Jun
dust213–70.0819%15 Jun
mirage8–130.0628%28 May
dust21–13-0.056%28 May
mirage8–13-0.0418%10 May
ancient13–160.0420%26 Apr
nuke11–130.0721%22 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0416%21 Apr
ancient13–80.0119%18 Mar
mirage13–70.0716%10 Feb
dust210–13-0.0626%10 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0430%10 Feb
ancient10–130.0318%31 Jan
anubis13–100.0213%31 Jan
ancient15–15-0.0516%30 Jan
mirage13–70.0417%5 Jan
ancient13–80.1016%2 Jan
dust213–40.0718%2 Jan
vertigo13–10-0.0215%1 Jan
mirage13–8-0.0013%31 Dec
dust213–90.0723%31 Dec
mirage16–140.0117%27 Dec
vertigo2–13-0.0516%26 Dec
nuke4–130.0120%24 Dec
dust28–13-0.0820%24 Dec
train13–3-0.0116%24 Dec
ancient13–70.0217%22 Dec
nuke14–16-0.0411%22 Dec
ancient7–13-0.0518%21 Dec
dust215–150.0427%21 Dec
vertigo8–130.0620%21 Dec
anubis13–9-0.0127%21 Dec
train9–130.0127%20 Dec
mirage13–80.0339%20 Dec
dust213–20.0630%20 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →