r0ck-kun rolling — CS2 Stats

76561198087380354[U:1:127114626]

1,420Tracked matches37%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,405Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.4 Learning
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,149), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate36.4%42.2%42.7%6.2% short
Shot accuracy8.4%11.9%10.8%2.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.780.981.000.21 short
Match win rate40.3%43.6%44.1%3.9% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 4 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGr0ck-kun rollingFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim21
Positioning36
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY34624Last 10034%Win rateLWLWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim2.1
Aggression2.2
Utility6.8
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 691ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.1
Positioning3.6
Utility6.8
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact0.6

Composite 3.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time680ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 674ms → last ⅓ avg 680ms
Headshot accuracy12.3%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 12.3% → last ⅓ avg 12.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.07Best rating — dust2 13–4
130Biggest win — inferno
3Longest win streak
1012In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 44% over 9mirageWeakest map · 20% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D36122433%-0.03
infernoC1871139%-0.06
overpassD1741324%-0.02
mirageD1531220%-0.01
anubisC94544%-0.03
cache32167%-0.00
ancient220100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

28,662Lifetime kills
0.78K/D
1,970Matches
40.3%Match win rate
36.4%Headshot %
8.4%Shot accuracy
2,747MVPs
870Hours (in match)
2,041Bombs planted
573Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,930dust2
3,354inferno
537nuke
370vertigo
224train
26office
19safehouse
6ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.7%Headshot accuracy
25.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.4%Spray accuracy
73.3%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
691msReaction time
16.3%T opening success
41.1%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
11.2%Flash assists
9.67HE damage / grenade
14.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.7252% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 16.3484% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.015%27 Aug
ancient10–1-0.0319%21 Jul
cache6–130.0217%21 Jul
cache16–120.0332%17 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0111%27 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0511%27 Jun
dust213–10-0.004%24 Jun
dust29–13-0.0315%24 Jun
dust213–7-0.0217%23 Jun
dust21–11-0.0412%20 Jun
dust28–13-0.068%18 Jun
anubis13–3-0.056%18 Jun
dust211–13-0.0215%16 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0215%16 Jun
overpass9–13-0.0613%26 May
inferno13–90.0114%22 May
overpass11–13-0.083%20 May
mirage7–13-0.0314%20 May
dust25–130.0021%19 May
overpass9–13-0.094%19 May
mirage8–13-0.0713%15 May
dust213–11-0.0114%15 May
overpass9–13-0.0215%15 May
overpass9–13-0.0211%14 May
inferno13–11-0.093%14 May
dust213–40.0713%12 May
dust26–13-0.0516%7 May
dust213–6-0.054%7 May
dust28–13-0.0219%6 May
overpass7–130.0419%6 May
overpass10–13-0.045%5 May
anubis13–90.0212%4 May
anubis16–14-0.045%3 May
inferno16–14-0.049%3 May
overpass13–16-0.0419%2 May
overpass13–110.0612%1 May
mirage7–130.019%1 May
dust215–15-0.0113%30 Apr
inferno13–00.0015%29 Apr
cache13–8-0.0514%29 Apr
dust216–14-0.0415%29 Apr
dust214–16-0.0317%28 Apr
mirage13–110.0211%28 Apr
dust213–8-0.0518%27 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0215%27 Apr
inferno9–13-0.106%27 Apr
dust215–15-0.0415%25 Apr
inferno10–13-0.074%23 Apr
dust211–13-0.0411%22 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0619%22 Apr
anubis5–13-0.018%22 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0312%22 Apr
overpass5–13-0.055%21 Apr
inferno14–16-0.066%21 Apr
dust25–13-0.057%21 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0211%20 Apr
dust213–10-0.0815%20 Apr
mirage9–130.0219%19 Apr
dust216–13-0.069%18 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0824%18 Apr
dust27–13-0.0410%18 Apr
mirage11–130.0517%18 Apr
overpass13–80.059%17 Apr
mirage13–110.0316%17 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0312%13 Apr
overpass4–13-0.0412%13 Apr
mirage1–10.000%13 Apr
dust27–13-0.0813%13 Apr
overpass13–90.0211%11 Apr
inferno1–13-0.157%11 Apr
dust213–11-0.0211%11 Apr
dust27–130.0115%11 Apr
dust27–13-0.0214%11 Apr
dust211–13-0.0415%9 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0515%9 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0220%9 Apr
mirage13–6-0.008%8 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0518%7 Apr
dust26–13-0.068%7 Apr
inferno10–13-0.102%3 Apr
anubis8–130.029%3 Apr
dust213–90.0311%3 Apr
dust26–13-0.0115%2 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0016%1 Apr
ancient7–3-0.0112%1 Apr
dust26–13-0.0412%1 Apr
dust29–3-0.039%31 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0819%31 Mar
dust29–13-0.0610%30 Mar
overpass6–13-0.0114%30 Mar
dust26–13-0.0019%30 Mar
overpass13–60.0410%29 Mar
inferno13–9-0.036%28 Mar
inferno11–13-0.047%27 Mar
dust28–13-0.0915%27 Mar
anubis9–13-0.1013%26 Mar
mirage15–15-0.039%26 Mar
dust215–15-0.077%25 Mar
inferno13–4-0.0215%25 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0722%24 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →