Mr. Boombastic — CS2 Stats

76561198087144621[U:1:126878893]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,213Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,871Hours in CS

CSDB Rating5.5 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating18,956Purple band · top ~12.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#13791 of 29514 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,720 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

18,786Peak Premier on CSDB

1,720Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,720
Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 31 to go
Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 18,956
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,044 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,146), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 8 median	Level 9 median	vs Level 9
Headshot rate	44.8%	47.2%	49.0%	4.1% short
Shot accuracy	14.2%	12.3%	13.1%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.96	1.07	1.08	0.12 short
Match win rate	47.5%	46.3%	46.9%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71

Positioning53

Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49–49–2Last 10049%Win rateLWLWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.1

Aggression7.9

Utility5.3

Positioning5.3

Opening Duels3.6

Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1

Positioning5.3

Utility5.3

Mechanics5.0

Opening Duels4.0

Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time543ms−20ms

first ⅓ avg 563ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms

Headshot accuracy20.4%+1.6%

first ⅓ avg 18.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — nuke 13–8

13–1Biggest win — dust2

4Longest win streak

9–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 20mirageWeakest map · 20% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	30	14–16	47%	-0.00
nuke	S	20	15–5	75%	0.01
ancient	B	13	6–7	46%	-0.00
cache	C	11	4–7	36%	-0.01
mirage	D	10	2–8	20%	-0.03
inferno	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.00
anubis	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.01
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

147,173Lifetime kills

0.96K/D

7,869Matches

47.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players

44.8%Headshot %

14.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players

21,817MVPs

3,871Hours (in match)

8,559Bombs planted

2,145Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4737,534

AWP22,173

M4A4 / M4A1-S21,870

Desert Eagle18,173

P2000 / USP-S8,524

Glock-185,793

SSG 085,004

P902,977

MP92,592

MAC-102,535

Lifetime map wins

26,505dust2

17,573nuke

5,977inferno

1,738vertigo

1,180train

413office

97cbble

18lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,069Matches

51%Win rate

0.98Avg K/D

68.9ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	119	47%	0.88	12.9
Nuke	96	62%	1.24	15.3
Ancient	77	42%	0.82	13.7
Dust2	67	51%	1.01	16.2
Cache	48	52%	0.83	11.5
Inferno	48	35%	0.90	14.3
Overpass	48	62%	0.87	13.8
Anubis	18	39%	0.85	13.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy

35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.1%Spray accuracy

72.6%Counter-strafing

9.5°Preaim

547msReaction time

27.1%T opening success

61.7%CT opening success

0.67Enemies flashed / flash

8.3%Flash assists

6.73HE damage / grenade

7.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.0519% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	9–13	0.01	10%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.03	15%	29 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	12%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.04	22%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.10	35%	28 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	19%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.01	10%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.00	28%	25 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.03	18%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.06	33%	25 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.01	39%	25 Aug →
inferno	3–13	0.02	11%	25 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	26%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.15	26%	24 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	16%	23 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.02	21%	23 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	24%	23 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	22%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–16	0.04	27%	22 Aug →
vertigo	13–7	-0.03	14%	22 Aug →
cache	0–13	-0.06	25%	21 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.04	19%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.07	14%	19 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.01	18%	18 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.07	13%	18 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	10%	18 Aug →
ancient	16–12	0.00	12%	17 Aug →
inferno	16–13	-0.03	28%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.01	24%	17 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.08	11%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.01	31%	16 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	24%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.04	16%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.08	24%	14 Aug →
anubis	1–10	-0.11	0%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.04	13%	14 Aug →
dust2	2–6	0.01	33%	13 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	21%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	12%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	15%	13 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	16%	13 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.01	19%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.04	25%	12 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	29%	12 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.07	19%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.04	19%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	23%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.02	17%	11 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	50%	11 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.02	16%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	23%	11 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.01	16%	11 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	16%	10 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.01	12%	10 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.00	19%	9 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.04	19%	8 Aug →
nuke	9–5	0.06	16%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.05	13%	8 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.06	32%	8 Aug →
anubis	16–14	0.06	20%	8 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	32%	7 Aug →
dust2	16–12	0.04	23%	6 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	9%	5 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.08	18%	5 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.02	29%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.05	14%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.02	13%	4 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.05	15%	4 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.06	28%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.11	15%	1 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	21%	1 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.03	20%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.06	5%	31 Jul →
nuke	16–12	-0.03	16%	31 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.00	19%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	8%	30 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.02	20%	30 Jul →
nuke	19–15	0.00	16%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.14	12%	29 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.00	17%	28 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	22%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.10	18%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.06	17%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.01	17%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	19%	26 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	32%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.03	22%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.00	17%	25 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.11	20%	24 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	29%	24 Jul →
nuke	19–16	0.04	24%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.05	11%	23 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.08	0%	23 Jul →
inferno	12–16	-0.05	11%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.06	20%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.06	40%	20 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.13	28%	20 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.00	14%	18 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	21%	18 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	28%	16 Jul →