Blue — CS2 Stats

76561198079421771[U:1:119156043]✓ No bans

686Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since
477Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBlueFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning43
Utility20

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46486Last 10046%Win rateLTLLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression4.6
Utility2.0
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch2.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 661ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.3
Utility2.0
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact3.8

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time650ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 661ms → last ⅓ avg 650ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 12–12
132Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC1981142%-0.01
mirageB179853%0.00
infernoB157847%0.01
dust2D1331023%-0.01
cacheD113827%-0.01
anubisC94544%-0.01
nukeS75271%0.02
overpass32167%-0.04
office220100%0.01
train21150%0.08
warden110100%-0.00
poseidon110100%-0.21

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

28,345Lifetime kills
1.28K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
1,311Matches
41.1%Match win rate
26.8%Headshot %
6.2%Shot accuracy
2,328MVPs
477Hours (in match)
745Bombs planted
394Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,845inferno
1,781dust2
1,443nuke
445train
371vertigo
154office
122lake
100italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

24Matches
54%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
75.1ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage850%1.0916.8
Inferno40%0.6611.3
Dust2367%1.1717.3
Anubis367%1.3816.7
Nuke2100%0.9215.0
Cache2100%0.7712.0
Train1100%1.2918.0
Ancient10%0.478.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
661msReaction time
30.6%T opening success
35.1%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
2.4%Flash assists
5.87HE damage / grenade
2.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3633 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.5809% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–130.0821%5 Aug
cache12–12-0.0010%17 Jul
cache5–13-0.009%17 Jul
cache4–13-0.0421%10 Jul
mirage13–90.019%10 Jul
mirage13–110.0222%4 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0611%4 Jul
inferno9–50.0518%4 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0116%3 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0610%3 Jul
mirage8–130.0914%3 Jul
dust26–13-0.0525%3 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0317%3 Jul
inferno13–70.0522%1 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0611%1 Jul
nuke9–130.0111%1 Jul
ancient13–70.009%27 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0313%27 Jun
dust27–13-0.0510%27 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0213%26 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0117%26 Jun
dust216–13-0.0611%26 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0518%26 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0216%24 Jun
overpass13–80.0118%24 Jun
ancient8–13-0.1214%24 Jun
mirage13–20.0129%24 Jun
ancient15–150.0618%24 Jun
mirage13–20.0827%24 Jun
dust25–13-0.0218%19 Jun
anubis13–50.0812%19 Jun
ancient13–8-0.026%16 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0112%14 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0214%13 Jun
anubis13–8-0.018%11 Jun
dust21–13-0.0122%11 Jun
inferno7–13-0.047%11 Jun
overpass13–6-0.057%10 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0212%10 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0319%6 Jun
office13–11-0.049%6 Jun
ancient10–130.0113%6 Jun
ancient15–150.0213%5 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0613%5 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0010%5 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0214%3 Jun
anubis13–60.0818%3 Jun
cache5–13-0.0121%3 Jun
inferno13–80.0517%3 Jun
mirage12–120.1534%2 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0512%30 May
dust215–15-0.0417%29 May
dust211–13-0.0213%24 May
ancient12–120.0540%23 May
nuke13–10-0.0310%23 May
cache13–80.0413%23 May
ancient7–13-0.0417%23 May
overpass9–13-0.097%23 May
anubis11–13-0.0110%23 May
dust24–13-0.0224%23 May
inferno9–130.0626%23 May
ancient12–16-0.0213%22 May
inferno7–13-0.0216%22 May
inferno13–5-0.0518%22 May
mirage13–40.0322%22 May
anubis4–13-0.0610%20 May
ancient13–10-0.0224%20 May
dust26–130.0321%19 May
ancient6–130.0021%16 May
inferno16–14-0.024%15 May
ancient13–80.0213%15 May
anubis11–13-0.0911%15 May
inferno7–9-0.0226%15 May
inferno13–9-0.059%10 May
ancient13–3-0.0024%10 May
ancient13–80.0214%9 May
inferno11–130.0216%9 May
dust213–70.1121%9 May
office13–90.0615%9 May
inferno9–130.087%9 May
mirage5–13-0.0815%9 May
ancient13–4-0.0416%9 May
dust213–11-0.029%9 May
cache5–13-0.0411%9 May
dust24–13-0.0837%2 May
warden13–8-0.0019%2 May
ancient13–80.0913%2 May
cache13–40.0322%2 May
poseidon9–7-0.2111%2 May
cache13–40.0123%1 May
cache10–130.0018%1 May
cache5–13-0.056%29 Apr
cache9–13-0.0113%29 Apr
nuke9–130.1014%26 Apr
nuke13–50.0714%26 Apr
train9–130.0413%24 Apr
inferno13–70.1015%24 Apr
nuke13–40.0225%24 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0215%23 Apr
train13–60.1228%23 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →