Cake

Cake — CS2 Stats

US76561198078743707[U:1:118477979]Steam profile ↗

832Tracked matches40%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,109Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.5 Developing
Premier CS Rating19,329Purple band · top ~11.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8569 of 17798 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCakeFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER19,329 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning41
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48466Last 10048%Win rateLLLLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.6
Aggression4.9
Utility4.2
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 619ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.1
Utility4.2
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time624ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 624ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — nuke 13–6
133Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
L5Current streak
127In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 14infernoWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2091145%-0.01
dust2B1910953%-0.01
ancientD1651131%-0.03
nukeA149564%0.01
cacheA116555%-0.03
infernoD102820%0.01
anubisA85363%-0.02
overpass220100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

51,546Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
2,602Matches
49.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
38.9%Headshot %
13.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
6,363MVPs
1,109Hours (in match)
1,665Bombs planted
541Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

9,801dust2
3,755inferno
2,147nuke
257vertigo
149cbble
113train
72office
57assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

15Matches
40%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
85.2ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
100%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke40%0.6810.5
Mirage3100%1.2217.3
Dust220%0.6411.0
Vertigo250%0.486.0
Anubis250%1.3815.5
Ancient10%0.294.0
Inferno1100%1.608.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
28.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.4%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
619msReaction time
25.2%T opening success
41.8%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
7.01HE damage / grenade
6.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4967 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.2068% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–160.0122%3 Aug
dust25–13-0.0219%1 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0640%19 Jul
inferno12–16-0.0410%19 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0625%19 Jul
inferno13–90.0622%19 Jul
dust211–13-0.0714%19 Jul
nuke8–13-0.1115%18 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0311%18 Jul
nuke13–60.1723%18 Jul
cache9–20.0417%18 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0115%18 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0130%18 Jul
cache4–13-0.039%18 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0418%18 Jul
ancient5–13-0.039%17 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0415%17 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0416%17 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0316%17 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0236%17 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0916%16 Jul
ancient2–1-0.0425%16 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0511%16 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0420%15 Jul
dust210–5-0.0028%15 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0112%15 Jul
dust213–9-0.0020%15 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0410%15 Jul
dust213–11-0.0523%15 Jul
dust28–13-0.0522%14 Jul
dust213–6-0.0212%14 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0515%13 Jul
cache4–13-0.0825%13 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0310%13 Jul
nuke16–140.0111%12 Jul
dust213–7-0.069%12 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0625%11 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0215%11 Jul
dust26–13-0.0223%11 Jul
cache6–13-0.0429%11 Jul
dust213–50.0314%11 Jul
mirage13–8-0.079%11 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0518%10 Jul
cache1–13-0.0826%10 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0420%10 Jul
cache13–5-0.0921%10 Jul
dust210–130.0519%10 Jul
dust213–11-0.0114%10 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0130%10 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0521%10 Jul
cache13–9-0.0118%10 Jul
nuke13–70.1713%10 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0717%10 Jul
dust213–80.0112%10 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0819%9 Jul
cache9–13-0.0714%9 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0715%9 Jul
cache13–9-0.0316%9 Jul
ancient13–80.0414%9 Jul
cache13–60.0737%9 Jul
dust213–100.0211%9 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0412%9 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0128%9 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0321%9 Jul
mirage13–50.1128%9 Jul
anubis13–90.0120%9 Jul
nuke13–110.1018%9 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0224%5 Jul
ancient11–130.0018%4 Jul
ancient7–110.0434%4 Jul
inferno9–130.0013%3 Jul
mirage13–100.0119%3 Jul
dust213–50.0326%3 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0220%3 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0123%1 Jul
overpass13–110.0320%1 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0127%1 Jul
dust23–110.0124%1 Jul
cache13–80.0326%1 Jul
dust211–130.0218%1 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0113%1 Jul
inferno9–130.0326%1 Jul
mirage13–100.0420%1 Jul
inferno13–30.1217%1 Jul
overpass13–90.0116%1 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0124%1 Jul
ancient15–150.0120%1 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0818%30 Jun
nuke8–130.0524%30 Jun
dust25–13-0.0315%29 Jun
mirage13–70.0616%29 Jun
dust215–150.059%29 Jun
mirage15–150.0521%27 Jun
inferno10–130.0227%25 Jun
nuke13–4-0.0115%25 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0121%25 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0022%25 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0122%25 Jun
inferno15–150.0011%25 Jun
nuke13–100.0213%25 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →