Groundhog

Groundhog — CS2 Stats

US76561198078692619[U:1:118426891]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,174Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,458Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,964Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6492 of 36053 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=3,917), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate40.8%47.2%49.9%9.1% short
Shot accuracy13.8%12.7%13.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.961.091.120.16 short
Match win rate43.4%46.6%48.4%5.0% short

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGroundhogPREMIER23,964 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning42
Utility22

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54451Last 10054%Win rateLWWWLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9
Aggression4.6
Utility2.2
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch2.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.2
Utility2.2
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time563ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 544ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy12.6%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 12.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–3
130Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
209In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 8infernoWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA23131057%-0.02
nukeA2112957%-0.02
anubisB21111052%-0.03
ancientB137654%-0.02
infernoC94544%-0.04
cacheS86275%-0.00
dust23030%-0.07
overpass21150%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

99,336Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
5,003Matches
43.4%Match win rate
40.8%Headshot %
13.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Pink band
11,202MVPs
2,458Hours (in match)
6,883Bombs planted
1,482Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4729,619
AWP9,134
SSG 082,328
FAMAS2,055
MP71,960

Lifetime map wins

8,618dust2
6,123inferno
5,332nuke
2,301train
2,278vertigo
718cbble
134office
95safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

763Matches
50%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
75.2ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1759%0.9913.9
Ancient1070%0.8612.8
Inferno862%0.9113.8
Anubis771%1.0315.0
Vertigo743%0.8415.3
Dust2367%0.8212.0
Train1100%1.1820.0
Overpass1100%0.539.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.8%Headshot accuracy
36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.1%Spray accuracy
86.0%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
559msReaction time
31.8%T opening success
38.9%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
6.42HE damage / grenade
0.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.8396% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3542 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.8491% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient4–13-0.0216%13 Aug
nuke13–80.0115%10 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0413%9 Aug
cache13–6-0.0525%2 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0416%30 Jul
cache8–13-0.089%28 Jul
cache13–50.0315%28 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0513%27 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0212%23 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0316%22 Jul
nuke13–110.048%21 Jul
anubis13–11-0.019%19 Jul
mirage5–13-0.046%19 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0210%19 Jul
anubis13–90.017%19 Jul
inferno14–16-0.037%17 Jul
cache13–9-0.0423%17 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0112%16 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0215%15 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0613%15 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0215%14 Jul
cache13–100.1012%14 Jul
ancient16–130.0611%13 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0312%12 Jul
cache13–60.0117%12 Jul
mirage13–80.0111%12 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0215%12 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0510%11 Jul
dust26–13-0.108%11 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0314%11 Jul
mirage13–11-0.067%11 Jul
inferno13–8-0.004%11 Jul
cache13–110.0319%9 Jul
mirage2–13-0.066%9 Jul
cache2–13-0.0120%8 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0012%5 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0412%5 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0415%5 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0710%2 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0113%2 Jul
nuke13–110.0311%1 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0818%30 Jun
inferno8–13-0.098%29 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0721%29 Jun
nuke10–130.0126%28 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0014%28 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0420%28 Jun
nuke0–13-0.050%27 Jun
ancient6–13-0.058%27 Jun
mirage0–6-0.0413%27 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0619%25 Jun
mirage2–80.0017%25 Jun
mirage13–70.029%24 Jun
mirage13–30.1224%24 Jun
ancient11–130.0213%24 Jun
mirage13–50.017%23 Jun
inferno1–13-0.0433%23 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0729%22 Jun
ancient16–14-0.0317%22 Jun
ancient13–80.0013%22 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0326%22 Jun
anubis13–110.0114%21 Jun
nuke13–11-0.069%21 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0515%21 Jun
nuke13–30.0226%19 Jun
dust21–13-0.1014%19 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0515%19 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0214%19 Jun
dust29–13-0.0118%18 Jun
anubis13–70.0314%18 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0516%17 Jun
mirage11–130.019%17 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0418%16 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0410%16 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0227%11 Jun
inferno13–7-0.008%8 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0312%6 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0627%6 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0713%4 Jun
ancient5–13-0.034%4 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0115%4 Jun
nuke14–160.0216%3 Jun
anubis4–13-0.1026%3 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0514%2 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0133%2 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0113%1 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0018%1 Jun
mirage13–6-0.069%31 May
nuke14–16-0.0413%31 May
nuke13–11-0.0421%30 May
anubis12–16-0.036%30 May
mirage13–00.016%30 May
ancient13–10-0.0015%28 May
mirage14–16-0.068%27 May
anubis13–70.0219%27 May
nuke13–11-0.0314%27 May
anubis13–20.0124%27 May
nuke13–11-0.0316%26 May
anubis6–130.0318%25 May
overpass13–11-0.0117%25 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →