Been Cheeling — CS2 Stats

US76561198078573729[U:1:118308001]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,558Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,681Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,013Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#17615 of 53759 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

21,352Peak Premier on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

339 below peak (21,352)
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,987 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,762), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 7 median	Level 8 median	vs Level 8
Headshot rate	36.0%	46.1%	47.0%	11.0% short
Shot accuracy	14.6%	12.6%	12.7%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.21	1.05	1.07	above
Match win rate	44.1%	45.7%	46.4%	2.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning49

Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–44–5Last 10051%Win rateWLWLLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1

Aggression6.8

Utility5.5

Positioning4.9

Opening Duels1.9

Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 557ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning4.9

Utility5.5

Mechanics8.0

Opening Duels1.9

Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time553ms+2ms

first ⅓ avg 551ms → last ⅓ avg 553ms

Headshot accuracy18.4%−0.3%

first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — cache 13–3

13–3Biggest win — cache

7Longest win streak

7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 11dust2Weakest map · 40% over 25

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	25	10–15	40%	0.02
cache	A	25	15–10	60%	0.03
ancient	B	23	12–11	52%	0.01
nuke	B	15	7–8	47%	-0.00
mirage	A	11	7–4	64%	0.01
anubis	—	1	0–1	0%	0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

109,644Lifetime kills

1.21K/D · Top 25% of Level 7 players

4,746Matches

44.1%Match win rate

36.0%Headshot %

14.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players

11,799MVPs

2,187Hours (in match)

5,141Bombs planted

1,257Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP34,699

AK-4721,348

M4A4 / M4A1-S12,973

Desert Eagle6,852

P2000 / USP-S6,354

Glock-184,127

SSG 083,141

Tec-92,748

P2502,022

Five-SeveN1,844

Lifetime map wins

16,198dust2

3,309inferno

2,715nuke

1,016cbble

949train

687vertigo

467office

96lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

162Matches

51%Win rate

1.21Avg K/D

82.6ADR

38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	19	42%	1.23	18.2
Ancient	18	56%	1.02	15.0
Anubis	17	65%	1.60	18.5
Dust2	15	53%	1.13	14.9
Nuke	11	45%	1.37	18.3
Inferno	10	50%	0.85	12.2
Train	6	50%	1.30	16.0
Cache	5	60%	1.12	16.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy

35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.4%Spray accuracy

85.8%Counter-strafing

8.5°Preaim

557msReaction time

38.8%T opening success

36.6%CT opening success

0.59Enemies flashed / flash

6.2%Flash assists

10.28HE damage / grenade

8.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.7754% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–6	0.02	22%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–16	-0.10	13%	29 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.04	21%	28 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	22%	28 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.01	19%	16 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.05	8%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.04	15%	16 Aug →
cache	6–11	0.01	11%	15 Aug →
dust2	12–16	-0.03	28%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.00	18%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.07	15%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.08	22%	7 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.04	14%	7 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.01	16%	5 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.04	28%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–4	-0.03	13%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.07	24%	3 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.08	32%	2 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.02	9%	2 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.03	31%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.07	18%	2 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	11%	2 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	17%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.01	20%	2 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.06	24%	2 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.01	22%	2 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.06	17%	2 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.12	27%	2 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.01	16%	2 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	16%	1 Aug →
dust2	3–13	0.01	10%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	16%	1 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.01	16%	1 Aug →
nuke	16–12	0.01	19%	1 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.00	22%	1 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	5%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.06	26%	31 Jul →
nuke	16–14	0.05	18%	31 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.06	36%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.01	21%	30 Jul →
dust2	16–12	0.06	17%	29 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.08	14%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.00	11%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.04	12%	29 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.01	29%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.01	27%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	15%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.07	15%	25 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	9%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.05	14%	25 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.05	23%	25 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.03	21%	25 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.02	19%	25 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.02	20%	25 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.02	17%	25 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.05	9%	25 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	23%	25 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.01	17%	25 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	8%	24 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.02	33%	24 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.08	21%	24 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	17%	24 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.02	27%	24 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.04	33%	23 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.04	16%	23 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.03	18%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.04	11%	23 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	10%	23 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.01	0%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.10	23%	22 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.04	27%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.04	17%	22 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.01	11%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.06	12%	21 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	16%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.05	18%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.04	8%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	26%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.01	24%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.02	33%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.05	19%	19 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.01	24%	19 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.00	16%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.06	16%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.06	29%	19 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.05	24%	19 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.05	20%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	19%	18 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.14	29%	18 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.04	20%	18 Jul →
cache	12–16	0.08	25%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.02	21%	17 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.08	10%	17 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.03	19%	16 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	6%	16 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.07	21%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.01	12%	16 Jul →
anubis	5–13	0.07	26%	15 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	15%	15 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.00	23%	15 Jul →