slim goop — CS2 Stats

CA76561198077102676[U:1:116836948]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,694Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since

5,648Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,169Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#6645 of 21970 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,022), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 7 median	Level 8 median	vs Level 8
Headshot rate	47.9%	46.2%	47.2%	meets
Shot accuracy	15.4%	12.5%	12.3%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.34	1.06	1.07	above
Match win rate	46.7%	45.9%	46.3%	meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 8 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88

Positioning68

Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–46–4Last 10050%Win rateLWLLLLLWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8

Aggression9.5

Utility4.4

Positioning6.8

Opening Duels5.0

Clutch6.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8

Positioning6.8

Utility4.4

Mechanics7.3

Opening Duels5.0

Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time580ms−47ms

first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms

Headshot accuracy21.4%−0.4%

first ⅓ avg 21.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — ancient 13–1

13–1Biggest win — ancient

5Longest win streak

4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 11dust2Weakest map · 38% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	26	14–12	54%	0.01
ancient	B	17	9–8	53%	0.04
dust2	C	16	6–10	38%	0.01
cache	B	15	7–8	47%	0.03
inferno	A	11	7–4	64%	0.04
nuke	A	9	5–4	56%	0.04
overpass	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01
anubis	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

205,418Lifetime kills

1.34K/D · Top 10% of Level 7 players

7,823Matches

46.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players

47.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players

15.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players

24,171MVPs

3,435Hours (in match)

8,805Bombs planted

2,796Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4770,587

M4A4 / M4A1-S34,672

AWP34,037

Desert Eagle13,236

P2000 / USP-S11,653

Glock-187,921

P2504,612

FAMAS3,342

Galil AR3,073

MAC-102,929

Lifetime map wins

20,238dust2

11,769inferno

6,082vertigo

5,991nuke

2,870train

516office

157cbble

78dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

729Matches

49%Win rate

1.19Avg K/D

88.0ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Vertigo	43	56%	1.22	17.2
Inferno	33	58%	1.23	15.7
Ancient	21	62%	1.29	17.2
Mirage	19	42%	0.98	17.5
Nuke	16	44%	0.97	14.3
Overpass	15	67%	1.21	15.3
Anubis	13	38%	1.23	16.6
Dust2	1	0%	1.47	22.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy

38.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

48.0%Spray accuracy

82.9%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

584msReaction time

38.9%T opening success

61.3%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

7.8%Flash assists

6.79HE damage / grenade

6.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.9218% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	10–13	0.06	15%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.03	20%	28 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	16%	28 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	13%	25 Aug →
mirage	2–13	0.02	28%	22 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	33%	22 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.06	33%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.23	22%	21 Aug →
nuke	15–15	0.01	20%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.04	29%	15 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	13%	12 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.05	32%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.07	32%	12 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.04	21%	12 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.04	30%	12 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.02	18%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.00	6%	6 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.03	13%	1 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	23%	1 Aug →
cache	16–13	0.06	28%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	18%	31 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.03	27%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.03	14%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.02	23%	30 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	19%	30 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.01	30%	29 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	19%	29 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.09	8%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.02	15%	29 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.12	23%	28 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.03	14%	28 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.00	26%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	26%	27 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	13%	27 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.03	15%	24 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.01	28%	23 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.16	23%	23 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	21%	23 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.07	20%	22 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	12%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.10	18%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.05	17%	22 Jul →
cache	13–3	-0.01	27%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.04	27%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.04	35%	20 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	24%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.02	12%	17 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.04	9%	15 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.02	14%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.10	34%	14 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.01	18%	14 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.12	27%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.05	24%	13 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.06	21%	13 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.04	24%	12 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.07	26%	10 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.05	20%	9 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.02	23%	5 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.08	32%	5 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.02	28%	5 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	20%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–16	-0.01	13%	3 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.02	20%	3 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	26%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.05	21%	1 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.05	23%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.08	25%	1 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.03	17%	1 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.04	33%	30 Jun →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	22%	30 Jun →
ancient	13–7	0.08	17%	29 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.02	18%	29 Jun →
overpass	10–13	0.04	12%	29 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	19%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	11%	26 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.04	26%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.03	26%	26 Jun →
ancient	13–7	0.06	18%	26 Jun →
overpass	8–13	-0.04	22%	26 Jun →
inferno	5–13	0.07	15%	25 Jun →
anubis	8–13	0.02	29%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.02	41%	24 Jun →
nuke	13–3	0.08	59%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.01	32%	24 Jun →
overpass	13–9	0.03	12%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.07	23%	24 Jun →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	18%	23 Jun →
anubis	16–12	0.01	14%	23 Jun →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	20%	23 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.12	27%	22 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	28%	22 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.10	20%	22 Jun →
anubis	4–13	-0.01	14%	21 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	25%	21 Jun →
dust2	15–15	0.10	23%	19 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.05	17%	19 Jun →
ancient	13–16	0.06	19%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.09	12%	17 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.04	10%	16 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.08	20%	16 Jun →