Salasanteri — CS2 Stats
FI76561198074249489[U:1:113983761]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,762), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 7 median | Level 8 median | vs Level 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 45.6% | 46.1% | 47.0% | 1.4% short |
| Shot accuracy | 11.5% | 12.6% | 12.7% | 1.2% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.88 | 1.05 | 1.07 | 0.20 short |
| Match win rate | 43.1% | 45.7% | 46.4% | 3.3% short |
This profile sits below the typical Level 8 player on every metric we can compare.
Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 92% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.
Where you differ: lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 31 | 17–14 | 55% | 0.05 | |
| D | 18 | 5–13 | 28% | 0.02 | |
| B | 15 | 7–8 | 47% | 0.02 | |
| D | 15 | 4–11 | 27% | 0.05 | |
| A | 11 | 6–5 | 55% | 0.05 | |
| — | 4 | 1–3 | 25% | 0.05 | |
| boulder | — | 2 | 0–2 | 0% | -0.03 |
| — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | 0.03 | |
| fachwerk | — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | -0.03 |
| — | 1 | 0–1 | 0% | 0.09 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inferno | 21 | 48% | 0.93 | 14.5 |
| Mirage | 21 | 57% | 1.04 | 14.4 |
| Anubis | 20 | 75% | 1.01 | 13.0 |
| Ancient | 11 | 64% | 0.99 | 14.0 |
| Nuke | 8 | 62% | 0.88 | 13.8 |
| Vertigo | 5 | 40% | 0.83 | 15.2 |
| Dust2 | 4 | 25% | 1.00 | 14.8 |
| Train | 2 | 0% | 0.46 | 7.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.9656% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7–13 | 0.03 | 11% | 30 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.10 | 23% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.01 | 15% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.05 | 17% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.01 | 14% | 26 Aug → | ||
| boulder | 6–13 | 0.01 | 14% | 26 Aug → | |
| 13–3 | -0.00 | 25% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 8–8 | 0.00 | 22% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 24% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.14 | 20% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.06 | 17% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 7–9 | 0.02 | 20% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.07 | 26% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 9–6 | 0.13 | 25% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.13 | 17% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.07 | 19% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.06 | 17% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.04 | 11% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.04 | 17% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 8–8 | 0.05 | 17% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 3–9 | -0.15 | 28% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.01 | 15% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.06 | 13% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.07 | 20% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.04 | 23% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.06 | 24% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 5–4 | 0.09 | 22% | 18 Aug → | ||
| boulder | 5–13 | -0.06 | 15% | 18 Aug → | |
| 13–5 | 0.02 | 21% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 7–0 | 0.12 | 8% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.04 | 14% | 18 Aug → | ||
| fachwerk | 7–13 | -0.03 | 10% | 18 Aug → | |
| 8–13 | 0.09 | 16% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.02 | 11% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.05 | 15% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.02 | 23% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 8–8 | 0.09 | 16% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.06 | 25% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.05 | 11% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.00 | 14% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | -0.00 | 17% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 15–15 | -0.02 | 24% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.05 | 21% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.04 | 19% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.03 | 21% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 7–9 | 0.09 | 36% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 9–4 | 0.16 | 24% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.02 | 18% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.02 | 11% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.02 | 9% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.08 | 18% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.07 | 12% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.03 | 25% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 9–7 | 0.14 | 15% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.07 | 14% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.03 | 14% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.02 | 9% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.04 | 15% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 11% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 5–3 | 0.03 | 22% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.02 | 20% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.06 | 13% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.00 | 11% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 7–2 | 0.09 | 20% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.13 | 19% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 2–9 | -0.10 | 23% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 9–5 | 0.08 | 28% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.00 | 14% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.03 | 24% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.02 | 18% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.07 | 8% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.05 | 22% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.04 | 14% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 9–4 | 0.24 | 23% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.02 | 11% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.15 | 14% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.03 | 22% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.04 | 19% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.06 | 10% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.07 | 21% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.00 | 14% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.05 | 20% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.04 | 20% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 9–5 | 0.12 | 18% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | 0.01 | 24% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.01 | 24% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.01 | 12% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 9–7 | 0.06 | 21% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.06 | 30% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.01 | 21% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.02 | 16% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.05 | 25% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 7–9 | -0.07 | 21% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.09 | 22% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.11 | 22% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.01 | 25% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.08 | 15% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.02 | 25% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 12–12 | 0.07 | 17% | 1 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.07 | 16% | 1 Aug → |
Match data via Leetify.