r/news HEAD moderator [Verified] — CS2 Stats

US76561198073405790[U:1:113140062]Steam profile ↗

3,326Tracked matches35%Win rate2023Tracked since

3,925Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating4.4 Developing

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 4 median	Level 5 median	vs Level 5
Headshot rate	48.6%	42.5%	44.2%	above
Shot accuracy	1.9%	10.9%	11.2%	9.3% short
Kill/death ratio	1.05	0.99	1.04	meets
Match win rate	45.8%	44.2%	45.3%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56

Positioning44

Utility22

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–42–12Last 10046%Win rateLLLWWTLTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.6

Aggression4.5

Utility2.2

Positioning4.4

Opening Duels2.1

Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 651ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6

Positioning4.4

Utility2.2

Mechanics8.4

Opening Duels2.6

Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time651ms−23ms

first ⅓ avg 673ms → last ⅓ avg 651ms

Headshot accuracy14.9%−2.6%

first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — nuke 0–3

13–2Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

L3Current streak

7–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 7vertigoWeakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	26	12–14	46%	0.01
cache	C	19	8–11	42%	0.00
mirage	A	18	10–8	56%	0.02
nuke	C	8	3–5	38%	0.00
inferno	S	7	5–2	71%	0.02
ancient	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.00
vertigo	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.04
office	D	6	2–4	33%	0.00
anubis	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.02
shelter	—	1	0–1	0%	0.04
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

103,391Lifetime kills

1.05K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players

4,547Matches

45.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 4 players

48.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players

1.9%Shot accuracy

8,118MVPs

2,658Hours (in match)

2,804Bombs planted

999Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4749,997

M4A4 / M4A1-S18,744

AWP11,991

Desert Eagle4,712

P2000 / USP-S3,406

MP92,467

Glock-182,453

Galil AR2,448

Tec-91,589

FAMAS888

Lifetime map wins

9,860dust2

5,099nuke

3,973office

3,541inferno

3,024vertigo

1,482train

74italy

17ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

12Matches

58%Win rate

0.84Avg K/D

71.3ADR

38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	2	100%	1.29	12.5
Dust2	2	50%	0.70	11.5
Vertigo	2	50%	0.64	15.0
Mirage	2	50%	1.24	21.5
Overpass	2	50%	0.64	15.0
Ancient	1	100%	0.82	9.0
Inferno	1	0%	0.25	4.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.3%Headshot accuracy

33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.2%Spray accuracy

87.6%Counter-strafing

10.8°Preaim

651msReaction time

25.9%T opening success

51.1%CT opening success

0.35Enemies flashed / flash

3.6%Flash assists

4.12HE damage / grenade

5.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.298% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3465 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.8739% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	3–13	-0.10	13%	23 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	14%	15 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.10	14%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.02	10%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	19%	8 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.03	21%	8 Aug →
nuke	0–3	0.24	25%	8 Aug →
nuke	12–12	-0.04	9%	3 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.01	21%	2 Aug →
cache	2–9	-0.03	25%	1 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.03	16%	31 Jul →
inferno	12–12	0.04	8%	31 Jul →
vertigo	13–7	-0.04	11%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.07	18%	30 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.01	17%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.03	22%	27 Jul →
dust2	12–12	-0.05	13%	26 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.03	10%	20 Jul →
office	10–13	0.06	14%	17 Jul →
vertigo	5–13	-0.08	12%	17 Jul →
shelter	8–13	0.04	16%	14 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.11	8%	13 Jul →
office	0–13	-0.03	12%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.03	11%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	14%	10 Jul →
mirage	4–10	-0.04	5%	10 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.04	10%	10 Jul →
cache	3–5	0.02	28%	8 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.00	11%	8 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	23%	7 Jul →
nuke	0–3	-0.14	0%	7 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.04	23%	6 Jul →
vertigo	13–11	0.00	20%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.08	22%	5 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	17%	5 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.02	18%	4 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.00	28%	4 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.05	20%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.08	12%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	22%	4 Jul →
nuke	0–5	-0.09	22%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.06	7%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.14	12%	3 Jul →
dust2	3–6	0.03	15%	3 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.03	10%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.02	27%	3 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.05	28%	3 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.06	20%	2 Jul →
nuke	12–12	0.03	16%	2 Jul →
inferno	12–12	0.01	27%	1 Jul →
cache	13–2	-0.00	23%	29 Jun →
cache	13–8	0.03	13%	29 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.02	10%	29 Jun →
office	13–7	-0.02	16%	27 Jun →
cache	9–13	-0.04	14%	26 Jun →
mirage	3–13	0.04	11%	26 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	14%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.03	12%	26 Jun →
office	7–13	-0.07	11%	25 Jun →
vertigo	7–13	-0.04	23%	25 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.08	24%	25 Jun →
cache	7–13	-0.01	25%	25 Jun →
ancient	4–13	-0.06	15%	25 Jun →
cache	13–10	0.04	25%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.03	17%	24 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.06	19%	24 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.07	29%	23 Jun →
anubis	12–12	-0.02	15%	23 Jun →
cache	13–8	-0.05	17%	22 Jun →
cache	13–5	-0.06	13%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	23%	22 Jun →
office	13–4	0.04	16%	22 Jun →
dust2	12–12	0.04	17%	22 Jun →
cache	6–13	-0.02	12%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.03	13%	21 Jun →
cache	10–13	0.02	12%	21 Jun →
cache	8–13	0.01	27%	21 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.05	19%	20 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.01	23%	20 Jun →
office	12–12	0.05	16%	20 Jun →
dust2	2–11	-0.05	40%	18 Jun →
vertigo	4–13	-0.10	7%	17 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.10	11%	17 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.07	11%	17 Jun →
nuke	13–3	0.02	22%	17 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.01	17%	16 Jun →
dust2	13–2	0.05	21%	16 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.07	18%	16 Jun →
ancient	12–12	0.01	24%	16 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.00	13%	16 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.05	18%	15 Jun →
vertigo	3–13	-0.02	19%	14 Jun →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	11%	14 Jun →
ancient	13–7	0.14	24%	14 Jun →
anubis	13–10	-0.03	11%	14 Jun →
cache	4–13	0.06	18%	14 Jun →
cache	13–6	0.00	13%	14 Jun →
ancient	13–2	-0.05	17%	14 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	17%	14 Jun →
overpass	6–13	-0.05	21%	13 Jun →