ItsTheToneDog — CS2 Stats

76561198072516427[U:1:112250699]

206Tracked matches52%Win rate2023Tracked since
664Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=928), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate43.0%42.5%44.2%1.2% short
Shot accuracy17.4%10.9%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.200.991.04above
Match win rate48.8%44.2%45.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGItsTheToneDogFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim47
Positioning34
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46486Last 10046%Win rateLLLWWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim4.7
Aggression1.7
Utility3.8
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch10.0

Strong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 70% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 36% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7
Positioning3.4
Utility3.8
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time596ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy11.3%−4.9%
first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 11.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — debris 9–1
130Biggest win — train
5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
49In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11infernoWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA148657%0.00
infernoC145936%-0.03
dust2C125742%-0.02
ancientA116555%-0.03
nukeS118373%-0.02
anubisC94544%-0.02
trainA74357%0.02
overpass42250%-0.00
vertigo41325%-0.07
poseidon31233%-0.08
cache3030%-0.03
office3030%-0.01
jura21150%-0.06
eldorado1010%0.04
debris110100%0.19
agency1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

35,959Lifetime kills
1.20K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players
1,809Matches
48.8%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players
43.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
17.4%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 4 players
4,418MVPs
664Hours (in match)
2,108Bombs planted
304Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,417dust2
1,177inferno
1,121office
761nuke
568cbble
418vertigo
408train
159lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

7Matches
86%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
79.3ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1100%1.1317.0
Mirage1100%1.1714.0
Overpass1100%0.9521.0
Ancient1100%1.2918.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.5%Headshot accuracy
30.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
76.0%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
587msReaction time
20.2%T opening success
36.0%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
10.4%Flash assists
10.58HE damage / grenade
6.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.5169% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4966 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.2228% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
poseidon3–9-0.2513%29 Jul
cache10–13-0.0111%25 Jul
eldorado5–90.0415%25 Jul
poseidon9–10.1216%25 Jul
debris9–10.1916%25 Jul
cache11–13-0.0216%6 May
cache9–13-0.049%6 May
ancient13–7-0.0016%6 May
ancient13–50.0516%18 Apr
mirage6–13-0.048%2 Apr
ancient13–8-0.046%22 Mar
overpass13–40.0410%17 Mar
mirage13–80.0114%13 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0314%19 Feb
inferno1–13-0.046%19 Feb
poseidon4–9-0.1312%19 Feb
ancient13–160.0013%15 Feb
inferno8–8-0.0013%14 Feb
anubis10–13-0.102%12 Feb
ancient13–8-0.015%12 Feb
ancient13–5-0.028%15 Aug
office4–13-0.0112%15 Aug
mirage13–80.045%31 Jul
inferno13–70.0115%30 Jul
mirage5–130.0010%29 Jul
inferno7–9-0.0411%29 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0118%28 Jul
mirage13–100.0113%22 Jul
overpass15–15-0.025%17 Jul
train13–100.0116%16 Jul
overpass13–70.0514%16 Jul
overpass4–13-0.087%16 Jul
inferno8–8-0.0410%12 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0410%12 Jul
anubis13–11-0.029%12 Jul
mirage15–150.0019%11 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0726%11 Jul
dust213–2-0.0211%8 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0016%6 Jul
train9–130.0210%6 Jul
anubis7–130.0211%2 Jul
vertigo7–13-0.0811%29 Jun
train13–00.1025%29 Jun
nuke13–8-0.098%29 Jun
mirage13–30.039%28 Jun
nuke13–60.079%28 Jun
mirage13–100.027%24 Jun
anubis9–13-0.058%24 Jun
train13–50.0915%20 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0215%18 Jun
train9–13-0.0011%18 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0513%29 May
dust24–13-0.1314%27 May
mirage13–100.019%26 May
mirage13–70.0115%26 May
vertigo11–13-0.0619%18 May
nuke13–3-0.0122%18 May
anubis13–6-0.0115%18 May
agency9–130.0114%9 May
jura8–13-0.0310%9 May
jura13–4-0.096%9 May
anubis12–160.0114%5 May
dust213–00.0714%5 May
mirage11–130.049%4 May
inferno5–13-0.093%3 May
nuke7–13-0.0617%3 May
nuke13–10-0.0314%28 Mar
train5–13-0.1026%28 Mar
inferno16–14-0.0411%21 Mar
ancient3–13-0.077%21 Mar
inferno9–7-0.0312%14 Mar
dust211–130.018%12 Mar
dust213–10-0.0712%2 Mar
inferno14–160.0121%2 Mar
dust25–13-0.0516%1 Mar
train13–20.018%27 Feb
ancient3–13-0.0917%25 Feb
anubis13–10-0.0019%20 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0419%20 Feb
dust210–60.0317%18 Feb
ancient13–10-0.0021%18 Feb
inferno2–13-0.0813%7 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0711%7 Feb
nuke13–7-0.0218%7 Feb
nuke13–100.1019%3 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0822%24 Jan
dust211–13-0.0414%20 Jan
vertigo2–13-0.1127%18 Jan
dust212–12-0.0820%18 Jan
office5–130.0122%18 Jan
anubis11–13-0.0611%16 Jan
dust213–70.0317%16 Jan
vertigo13–10-0.0320%7 Jan
ancient4–13-0.0720%7 Jan
inferno13–60.0010%7 Jan
inferno10–10.0118%30 Dec
office10–13-0.0316%30 Dec
dust210–13-0.019%13 Dec
anubis13–90.0011%11 Dec
dust210–13-0.0224%11 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →