Gerodrix — CS2 Stats

76561198072330196[U:1:112064468]

422Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,206Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,103 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGerodrixFACEITLevel 5 · 1,103 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning47
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47494Last 10047%Win rateLLWLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1
Aggression5.3
Utility3.8
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 660ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.7
Utility3.8
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time661ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 684ms → last ⅓ avg 661ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — anubis 13–8
131Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC30131743%-0.00
dust2C2081240%0.02
infernoA1810856%-0.01
nukeB147750%0.02
anubisC83538%0.01
overpassS54180%0.01
ancientC52340%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

57,286Lifetime kills
1.04K/D
3,047Matches
45.2%Match win rate
43.6%Headshot %
15.8%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
7,256MVPs
1,240Hours (in match)
3,020Bombs planted
659Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,732dust2
4,753inferno
1,527nuke
931train
653cbble
409vertigo
79assault
47lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

90Matches
52%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
96.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2143%1.1917.6
Inferno1070%1.5022.3
Dust2956%1.0817.9
Anubis757%1.2915.1
Ancient540%1.0021.2
Nuke450%1.2426.5
Overpass367%1.3119.7
Train250%1.4924.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
660msReaction time
29.9%T opening success
44.6%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
6.38HE damage / grenade
5.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.9302% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage14–16-0.0411%27 Aug
dust213–16-0.0124%21 Jul
mirage13–100.0321%21 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0717%2 Jul
mirage13–4-0.089%29 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0720%27 Jun
mirage8–130.0228%25 Jun
mirage3–13-0.1138%18 Jun
nuke13–100.0218%18 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0118%14 Jun
dust28–130.0719%14 Jun
mirage11–20.0429%14 Jun
mirage2–13-0.1050%14 Jun
mirage8–130.0029%3 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0518%1 Jun
mirage13–100.0427%1 Jun
inferno13–5-0.0316%30 May
mirage13–10-0.0317%12 May
dust22–13-0.0014%7 May
mirage11–13-0.0317%30 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0521%23 Apr
dust27–13-0.0219%19 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0214%17 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0511%11 Apr
anubis14–16-0.0115%31 Mar
nuke13–6-0.0210%25 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0423%25 Mar
overpass13–90.0417%24 Mar
dust210–40.1228%22 Mar
inferno13–40.0622%22 Mar
inferno13–6-0.0217%21 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0115%21 Mar
nuke12–160.0117%18 Mar
mirage15–15-0.0316%12 Mar
dust215–15-0.0323%12 Mar
dust211–130.0019%10 Mar
inferno13–100.0211%7 Mar
nuke13–50.1031%1 Mar
mirage13–100.1023%1 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0411%27 Feb
ancient1–13-0.0423%24 Feb
inferno13–90.0413%22 Feb
mirage13–80.0720%21 Feb
inferno13–80.045%19 Feb
dust215–150.0513%17 Feb
mirage10–13-0.027%14 Feb
dust211–13-0.0115%13 Feb
ancient5–13-0.037%12 Feb
overpass13–60.0319%12 Feb
dust28–13-0.0110%11 Feb
dust27–13-0.068%11 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0612%11 Feb
anubis15–15-0.0028%10 Feb
inferno0–13-0.100%10 Feb
mirage13–70.0618%10 Feb
dust213–20.019%9 Feb
inferno16–140.0114%8 Feb
dust29–13-0.0415%8 Feb
ancient13–90.0817%8 Feb
overpass12–40.0147%8 Feb
mirage13–110.0316%8 Feb
inferno9–130.0315%8 Feb
anubis13–80.1420%6 Feb
nuke13–50.0515%6 Feb
mirage9–130.1017%6 Feb
dust213–10.0413%5 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0223%5 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0430%5 Feb
overpass10–10.0224%5 Feb
dust213–70.0620%5 Feb
dust213–100.0310%4 Feb
anubis8–130.048%3 Feb
nuke13–50.0414%2 Feb
ancient13–40.0416%2 Feb
anubis13–40.038%2 Feb
nuke5–130.0621%2 Feb
inferno11–130.0022%1 Feb
nuke13–110.0311%1 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0118%31 Jan
mirage13–40.0413%30 Jan
mirage13–70.0312%30 Jan
anubis11–130.0419%30 Jan
inferno16–13-0.0117%30 Jan
overpass7–13-0.0618%29 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0220%29 Jan
mirage2–13-0.0218%29 Jan
nuke13–70.0317%29 Jan
nuke10–130.0920%29 Jan
dust27–130.0115%29 Jan
inferno4–13-0.1024%28 Jan
dust213–100.0421%28 Jan
inferno13–50.0630%28 Jan
nuke7–130.0218%27 Jan
anubis1–1-0.140%27 Jan
mirage16–140.0612%26 Jan
nuke10–130.0125%25 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0524%25 Jan
dust213–90.1121%25 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0815%25 Jan
dust213–90.0715%22 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →