isohel — CS2 Stats

76561198071871285[U:1:111605557]

392Tracked matches44%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,452Hours in CS8Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=607), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate52.9%42.1%42.5%above
Shot accuracy23.0%12.1%10.9%above
Kill/death ratio1.450.990.99above
Match win rate36.8%43.9%44.2%7.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGisohelFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning48
Utility18

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY464410Last 10046%Win rateLLLWWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.3
Aggression4.5
Utility1.8
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 659ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.8
Utility1.8
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact3.1

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time653ms+36ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 653ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 24.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — dust2 9–0
131Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 14overpassWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA28181064%0.02
nukeS1410471%0.03
vertigoC145936%0.03
mirageD1321115%-0.02
ancientC94544%-0.01
dust2C52340%0.03
overpassD5050%0.00
anubis42250%0.01
cache330100%-0.00
office2020%0.01
train1010%0.07
thera1010%-0.07
tuscan1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

65,545Lifetime kills
1.45K/D · Top 5% of Level 3 players
2,410Matches
36.8%Match win rate
52.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 3 players
23.0%Shot accuracy · Top 1% of Level 3 players
5,240MVPs
844Hours (in match)
2,896Bombs planted
541Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,057dust2
2,916inferno
1,252nuke
839vertigo
293office
185train
89cbble
73italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.0%Spray accuracy
85.7%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
659msReaction time
23.0%T opening success
49.9%CT opening success
0.27Enemies flashed / flash
2.6%Flash assists
7.37HE damage / grenade
2.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2739 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.0408% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office5–130.0129%23 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0112%22 Aug
nuke11–130.0132%22 Aug
nuke13–70.0517%21 Aug
cache16–12-0.0418%21 Aug
dust27–13-0.0124%21 Aug
cache13–50.0317%20 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0116%15 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0223%15 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0436%15 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0531%26 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0120%26 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0515%19 Jul
dust24–130.0219%19 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0712%19 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0422%19 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0118%11 Apr
inferno15–15-0.0418%11 Apr
nuke13–90.0216%11 Apr
dust28–13-0.0919%11 Apr
nuke13–11-0.0119%7 Apr
train6–130.0721%20 Jul
inferno13–40.0433%19 Jul
overpass2–130.0116%19 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0016%19 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0213%19 Jul
dust213–60.0722%19 Jul
overpass15–150.0024%18 Jul
office12–120.0231%16 Jan
anubis13–40.1131%16 Jan
thera1–13-0.0719%3 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0130%14 Apr
inferno13–20.1419%14 Apr
nuke13–50.0733%7 Apr
inferno9–130.0219%6 Apr
inferno1–80.0217%6 Apr
mirage13–20.1733%1 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0019%1 Apr
nuke13–30.04100%1 Apr
vertigo13–4-0.0325%1 Apr
inferno13–50.0625%25 Dec
ancient5–13-0.0619%23 Dec
mirage10–13-0.0220%15 Dec
ancient13–60.0323%15 Dec
inferno13–40.0528%15 Dec
vertigo15–150.0726%13 Dec
ancient9–13-0.0133%13 Dec
nuke13–100.0125%12 Dec
inferno8–5-0.0324%9 Dec
inferno10–130.0322%27 Nov
inferno3–130.0131%18 Nov
vertigo13–50.0317%11 Nov
mirage8–130.0019%24 Sept
ancient8–130.0221%24 Sept
inferno5–130.0428%23 Sept
mirage5–13-0.1413%22 Sept
inferno13–7-0.048%22 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0326%18 Sept
inferno13–40.0129%18 Sept
vertigo11–130.0626%17 Sept
nuke13–50.0338%17 Sept
anubis13–80.0118%17 Sept
ancient13–5-0.0019%17 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0433%17 Sept
inferno13–30.0528%16 Sept
vertigo13–40.1532%16 Sept
overpass15–150.0322%16 Sept
inferno15–150.0530%16 Sept
vertigo13–16-0.0124%16 Sept
nuke13–10.0821%15 Sept
inferno8–00.0440%11 Sept
inferno13–70.0626%11 Sept
vertigo16–140.0334%10 Sept
nuke10–130.0232%10 Sept
vertigo9–130.0225%9 Sept
inferno13–110.0235%9 Sept
inferno13–60.0623%9 Sept
nuke15–150.1033%6 Sept
overpass3–13-0.0621%6 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0124%4 Sept
overpass15–150.0319%4 Sept
dust29–00.1831%3 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0711%3 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0527%2 Sept
inferno13–4-0.0132%2 Sept
vertigo11–13-0.0623%2 Sept
inferno9–50.0529%26 Aug
vertigo5–9-0.0419%19 Aug
nuke9–50.0420%6 Jul
inferno9–30.0725%2 Jul
vertigo9–30.1516%25 Jun
ancient8–8-0.0633%25 Jun
mirage1–9-0.0721%23 Jun
cache9–70.0013%23 Jun
nuke6–90.0423%16 Jun
tuscan5–90.0114%10 Jun
vertigo4–90.0526%10 Jun
mirage6–9-0.0515%4 Jun
vertigo6–9-0.0018%4 Jun
vertigo3–90.0224%3 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →