loot — CS2 Stats

76561198069954956[U:1:109689228]

415Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
731Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlootFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning43
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD464311Last 10046%Win rateLLLWTLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression5.2
Utility2.5
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 550ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.3
Utility2.5
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact8.1

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time554ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 536ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%−6.6%
first ⅓ avg 27.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — cache 13–3
131Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
74In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 9infernoWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C1871139%-0.03
mirageA169756%-0.01
cacheA159660%-0.00
infernoD1331023%-0.02
ancientD123925%-0.04
nukeA106460%-0.03
overpassS96367%-0.01
trainB63350%-0.02
office1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,941Lifetime kills
0.82K/D
1,852Matches
40.2%Match win rate
32.2%Headshot %
16.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
3,502MVPs
731Hours (in match)
1,276Bombs planted
348Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-476,210
AWP5,437
SSG 082,251
P901,329
Knife1,074
P250990

Lifetime map wins

8,484dust2
987inferno
720nuke
202train
117lake
109vertigo
56cbble
50safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

49Matches
55%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
91.3ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1867%1.5216.6
Inferno850%0.9416.6
Vertigo650%0.8013.0
Ancient580%1.0214.0
Anubis50%0.619.6
Dust2475%1.1617.8
Nuke250%1.0017.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
72.6%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
550msReaction time
31.7%T opening success
37.9%CT opening success
0.29Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
8.47HE damage / grenade
4.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.288 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.7237% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–13-0.0412%26 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0829%26 Jun
inferno8–13-0.079%19 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0326%19 Jun
ancient12–12-0.0613%10 Jun
dust28–13-0.0114%10 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0326%10 Jun
mirage13–20.0814%9 Jun
dust213–8-0.069%4 Jun
cache1–13-0.1217%4 Jun
cache13–10-0.0220%18 May
dust212–12-0.0532%18 May
mirage13–40.0014%18 May
mirage7–130.0557%13 May
cache13–7-0.1015%13 May
overpass13–11-0.0815%13 May
cache8–130.0615%9 May
cache13–9-0.0411%9 May
nuke13–11-0.0415%9 May
cache3–13-0.0622%6 May
inferno13–10-0.0126%4 May
cache13–50.0820%3 May
cache13–7-0.0213%29 Apr
cache12–120.0530%29 Apr
cache13–30.1223%29 Apr
cache13–5-0.0016%29 Apr
cache11–13-0.0218%29 Apr
cache13–60.0213%29 Apr
cache9–130.0141%29 Apr
cache7–20.0525%29 Apr
dust212–120.0023%22 Apr
overpass13–110.0322%21 Apr
nuke13–6-0.0826%13 Apr
ancient12–120.0118%13 Apr
dust25–13-0.0323%8 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0121%31 Mar
nuke4–130.0318%31 Mar
dust29–13-0.0526%31 Mar
inferno8–130.0119%31 Mar
mirage0–13-0.0524%29 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0638%29 Mar
dust213–3-0.0230%29 Mar
inferno9–130.0121%22 Mar
mirage13–10-0.1013%22 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0518%21 Mar
dust213–9-0.1514%20 Mar
ancient12–12-0.0213%12 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0835%12 Mar
nuke3–13-0.0933%12 Mar
overpass3–13-0.0131%12 Mar
dust22–13-0.0520%12 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0118%16 Jan
dust213–20.0736%16 Jan
overpass13–11-0.0217%8 Jan
inferno12–120.0332%8 Jan
mirage3–130.0335%7 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0621%7 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0041%7 Jan
dust27–130.0015%7 Jan
mirage13–30.0819%7 Jan
train2–13-0.0118%7 Jan
inferno13–110.0319%7 Jan
dust213–2-0.0218%6 Jan
train13–50.0226%6 Jan
overpass4–0-0.020%6 Jan
nuke13–50.0229%6 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0330%6 Jan
mirage13–30.0422%6 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0525%6 Jan
train13–9-0.0417%6 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0226%3 Jan
dust213–10-0.0717%3 Jan
mirage12–12-0.0527%3 Jan
inferno13–1-0.0127%3 Jan
nuke13–7-0.0517%3 Jan
ancient13–50.0135%3 Jan
dust212–12-0.0232%1 Jan
train5–13-0.0723%1 Jan
inferno12–12-0.009%1 Jan
overpass13–70.0629%1 Jan
train13–50.1025%26 Dec
dust213–20.0421%26 Dec
nuke13–80.0026%26 Dec
dust22–13-0.0336%26 Dec
overpass11–130.0021%26 Dec
ancient3–13-0.1025%26 Dec
mirage4–13-0.0128%26 Dec
overpass13–50.0147%24 Dec
ancient5–13-0.0937%23 Dec
nuke2–13-0.0842%23 Dec
office5–13-0.0243%20 Dec
train6–13-0.1012%20 Dec
nuke13–110.0636%20 Dec
ancient13–10-0.0525%20 Dec
mirage6–13-0.0543%20 Dec
dust21–13-0.0143%20 Dec
mirage13–20.0141%20 Dec
inferno8–13-0.060%20 Dec
ancient12–12-0.0319%20 Dec
dust26–13-0.0426%16 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →