Eben — CS2 Stats

76561198067917427[U:1:107651699]

1,482Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since

1,287Hours in CS

CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,748Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#11943 of 40553 tracked

FaceitLevel 6 · 1,215 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,571), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 6 median	Level 7 median	vs Level 7
Headshot rate	47.9%	44.7%	46.1%	above
Shot accuracy	6.1%	11.9%	12.6%	6.5% short
Kill/death ratio	1.07	1.04	1.05	meets
Match win rate	37.9%	45.2%	45.7%	7.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61

Positioning54

Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–41–3Last 10056%Win rateLWWLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1

Aggression6.7

Utility2.9

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels4.3

Clutch2.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1

Positioning5.4

Utility2.9

Mechanics5.1

Opening Duels4.3

Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time575ms−22ms

first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms

Headshot accuracy22.7%−1.7%

first ⅓ avg 24.4% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — inferno 9–3

13–1Biggest win — cache

7Longest win streak

13–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

17Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 41% over 29

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	29	12–17	41%	-0.01
dust2	S	23	15–8	65%	0.00
cache	A	20	12–8	60%	0.01
inferno	B	10	5–5	50%	0.03
ancient	S	7	5–2	71%	-0.01
nuke	S	6	5–1	83%	-0.01
anubis	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.01
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.00
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 29). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

78,300Lifetime kills

1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players

3,674Matches

37.9%Match win rate

47.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 6 players

6.1%Shot accuracy

7,555MVPs

1,287Hours (in match)

2,773Bombs planted

687Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4726,443

M4A4 / M4A1-S16,277

AWP10,107

P2000 / USP-S3,700

P902,954

Glock-182,593

Desert Eagle2,410

SSG 081,918

FAMAS1,382

Galil AR1,226

Lifetime map wins

7,790dust2

2,830nuke

2,733inferno

910vertigo

516train

193office

33cbble

24italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

211Matches

49%Win rate

1.13Avg K/D

81.7ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	61	48%	1.11	16.1
Dust2	46	43%	1.18	15.8
Ancient	31	52%	1.15	15.7
Inferno	21	62%	1.09	15.2
Overpass	20	45%	1.04	14.9
Nuke	19	53%	1.16	16.5
Train	8	38%	0.97	15.3
Anubis	5	80%	1.54	17.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.8%Headshot accuracy

27.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

30.7%Spray accuracy

72.8%Counter-strafing

8.4°Preaim

571msReaction time

43.4%T opening success

50.6%CT opening success

0.38Enemies flashed / flash

7.2%Flash assists

6.31HE damage / grenade

1.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.379 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 29 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	10–13	-0.04	14%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.04	16%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.10	31%	14 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.02	11%	31 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.06	28%	30 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	17%	30 Jul →
vertigo	4–13	-0.00	27%	29 Jul →
cache	14–16	-0.04	20%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.03	31%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	32%	28 Jul →
cache	16–12	0.03	26%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	22%	24 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	32%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	21%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.04	27%	24 Jul →
dust2	12–16	0.01	23%	24 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	29%	24 Jul →
inferno	8–8	0.08	23%	24 Jul →
anubis	2–13	0.01	38%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.01	24%	24 Jul →
dust2	16–12	0.01	14%	23 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.02	18%	23 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.02	19%	23 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	21%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	23%	23 Jul →
cache	16–14	-0.01	18%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	12%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	23%	22 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.04	28%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	21%	21 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	22%	21 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.00	20%	20 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.06	15%	20 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.05	18%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.03	28%	20 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.05	14%	20 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	9%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.06	31%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.01	24%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–3	-0.09	14%	19 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	19%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	13%	19 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	17%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.04	23%	18 Jul →
cache	12–16	-0.02	16%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.01	13%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.00	18%	18 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.00	20%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	28%	17 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.00	34%	17 Jul →
dust2	16–14	0.03	21%	17 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.02	19%	16 Jul →
nuke	5–0	0.00	0%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.02	36%	16 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	21%	16 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.06	20%	16 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	20%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.02	20%	15 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	31%	15 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.04	38%	15 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.00	21%	15 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.06	16%	15 Jul →
dust2	12–16	0.01	23%	15 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.02	24%	12 Jul →
dust2	12–16	-0.06	28%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–16	-0.04	21%	12 Jul →
inferno	10–0	-0.03	17%	12 Jul →
dust2	16–14	-0.05	27%	12 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.10	29%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.05	24%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.03	13%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.01	14%	11 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.02	15%	9 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	30%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	20%	4 Jul →
dust2	14–16	0.02	26%	29 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.01	41%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–3	-0.03	17%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.05	31%	29 Jun →
anubis	13–3	0.02	24%	29 Jun →
inferno	13–2	0.06	28%	29 Jun →
inferno	7–9	0.08	33%	29 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.09	31%	29 Jun →
train	13–11	0.02	20%	29 Jun →
cache	13–7	0.14	16%	29 Jun →
mirage	3–13	-0.08	22%	29 Jun →
ancient	13–2	-0.00	26%	28 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.02	30%	28 Jun →
cache	13–7	-0.05	19%	28 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	22%	28 Jun →
cache	7–13	0.03	21%	28 Jun →
cache	13–8	-0.01	19%	28 Jun →
dust2	14–16	-0.06	16%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	30%	27 Jun →
cache	13–6	-0.00	21%	27 Jun →
cache	13–11	0.03	25%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	24%	26 Jun →
inferno	9–3	0.20	30%	26 Jun →
cache	13–7	0.04	20%	25 Jun →
cache	13–1	0.09	42%	24 Jun →