Soggy Cheerios

Soggy Cheerios — CS2 Stats

76561198066856171[U:1:106590443]Steam profile ↗

2,613Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,158Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.7 Learning
Premier CS Rating16,864Purple band · top ~21% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24873 of 46229 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,002), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate38.9%44.2%47.1%8.1% short
Shot accuracy10.0%11.6%12.8%2.8% short
Kill/death ratio0.901.031.080.18 short
Match win rate42.7%45.2%46.6%3.9% short

This profile sits below the typical Pink band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSoggy CheeriosPREMIER16,864 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim27
Positioning38
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD54442Last 10054%Win rateLLLTWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim2.7
Aggression6.1
Utility5.6
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 712ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.7
Positioning3.8
Utility5.6
Mechanics3.6
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time718ms+41ms
first ⅓ avg 676ms → last ⅓ avg 718ms
Headshot accuracy14.4%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.9% → last ⅓ avg 14.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — ancient 13–8
131Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
138In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 68% over 22cacheWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2215768%0.00
cacheD1861233%-0.03
ancientA1710759%-0.02
dust2A1610663%-0.01
infernoC125742%0.01
nukeD62433%-0.03
anubis43175%-0.02
vertigo31233%-0.02
train110100%0.02
fachwerk110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

93,327Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
5,813Matches
42.7%Match win rate
38.9%Headshot %
10.0%Shot accuracy
11,003MVPs
2,158Hours (in match)
6,790Bombs planted
1,218Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,635
AWP8,262
MAC-102,897
FAMAS2,597
P902,335

Lifetime map wins

19,672dust2
6,554inferno
2,391nuke
1,903vertigo
1,553train
899office
349cbble
162italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
30.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.3%Spray accuracy
66.2%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
712msReaction time
33.2%T opening success
44.7%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
8.83HE damage / grenade
7.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 712.4878ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.2176% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient6–13-0.0611%27 Aug
cache3–13-0.0420%27 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0521%24 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0120%19 Aug
train13–80.0217%16 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0221%11 Aug
dust213–9-0.0322%5 Aug
vertigo8–13-0.0421%31 Jul
vertigo11–13-0.0316%31 Jul
cache13–60.0321%28 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0112%27 Jul
mirage13–7-0.046%27 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0315%27 Jul
inferno9–130.0218%27 Jul
cache13–16-0.068%26 Jul
cache9–130.013%24 Jul
dust213–100.0223%23 Jul
inferno8–10.0512%23 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0119%23 Jul
ancient13–110.0617%23 Jul
anubis15–150.0113%22 Jul
cache13–9-0.0520%22 Jul
dust213–40.0010%22 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0018%22 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0713%22 Jul
dust213–100.0714%18 Jul
dust29–13-0.0318%18 Jul
nuke9–130.0410%18 Jul
cache7–13-0.075%17 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0411%17 Jul
inferno7–130.026%16 Jul
ancient13–110.0610%16 Jul
fachwerk13–20.095%16 Jul
inferno7–130.0113%16 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0313%16 Jul
mirage13–10-0.027%15 Jul
dust27–13-0.0120%15 Jul
cache11–13-0.0314%15 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0413%15 Jul
cache6–130.0514%14 Jul
mirage13–90.0321%14 Jul
cache11–13-0.0314%13 Jul
mirage13–70.0120%13 Jul
cache13–7-0.046%13 Jul
mirage13–3-0.017%13 Jul
cache4–13-0.059%13 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0117%13 Jul
cache7–13-0.0216%11 Jul
mirage13–100.0121%11 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0910%11 Jul
cache3–13-0.0223%11 Jul
ancient5–13-0.029%10 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0413%10 Jul
cache13–11-0.0423%10 Jul
mirage13–40.1019%10 Jul
dust213–7-0.0315%10 Jul
mirage13–30.0815%10 Jul
cache11–13-0.046%10 Jul
dust28–13-0.0118%10 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0422%10 Jul
cache13–8-0.0023%10 Jul
ancient13–1-0.0113%9 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0218%9 Jul
cache6–13-0.0814%9 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0216%9 Jul
mirage2–130.0024%9 Jul
inferno10–130.0117%9 Jul
cache13–11-0.068%7 Jul
vertigo13–10-0.0023%6 Jul
ancient4–13-0.026%6 Jul
dust213–11-0.063%6 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0314%6 Jul
ancient13–3-0.039%5 Jul
mirage11–130.0415%5 Jul
dust213–8-0.009%2 Jul
dust212–16-0.0210%2 Jul
ancient5–13-0.029%2 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0916%2 Jul
mirage13–70.0228%2 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0633%2 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0618%2 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0318%30 Jun
inferno13–100.0713%30 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0216%30 Jun
dust213–50.048%25 Jun
mirage13–100.057%25 Jun
dust213–110.0216%25 Jun
dust210–13-0.0130%25 Jun
nuke16–120.0215%25 Jun
ancient13–80.1116%25 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0312%25 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0319%24 Jun
ancient13–9-0.069%24 Jun
dust213–11-0.0321%24 Jun
dust28–13-0.0616%24 Jun
inferno6–30.006%24 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0614%23 Jun
nuke5–13-0.054%19 Jun
mirage11–130.0525%19 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0325%19 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →