buggajayjay — CS2 Stats

AU76561198063851816[U:1:103586088]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

911Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since

2,922Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating17,822Purple band · top ~17.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#16094 of 31175 tracked

WingmanSilver Elite Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,789), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Purple band median	Pink band median	vs Pink band
Headshot rate	62.9%	44.1%	47.2%	above
Shot accuracy	15.2%	11.4%	12.7%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.40	1.03	1.09	above
Match win rate	31.3%	45.2%	46.6%	15.3% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65

Positioning65

Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45–50–5Last 10045%Win rateWLWLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5

Aggression7.4

Utility3.2

Positioning6.5

Opening Duels2.9

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5

Positioning6.5

Utility3.2

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels3.0

Win Impact1.4

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time606ms−9ms

first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms

Headshot accuracy14.2%+0.1%

first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 14.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — nuke 13–6

13–0Biggest win — cache

4Longest win streak

3–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 16anubisWeakest map · 31% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	29	11–18	38%	0.02
cache	C	18	7–11	39%	0.01
nuke	S	16	11–5	69%	0.04
anubis	D	13	4–9	31%	-0.01
mirage	B	13	6–7	46%	0.02
inferno	C	5	2–3	40%	0.00
office	—	3	1–2	33%	0.03
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.00
ancient	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

163,077Lifetime kills

1.40K/D · Top 10% of Purple band

5,009Matches

31.3%Match win rate

62.9%Headshot % · Top 5% of Purple band

15.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Purple band

8,314MVPs

1,833Hours (in match)

2,456Bombs planted

1,545Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4781,252

Desert Eagle15,154

M4A4 / M4A1-S14,141

P2000 / USP-S10,662

AWP10,313

FAMAS4,340

SSG 083,420

Glock-182,868

MP92,764

Galil AR1,900

Lifetime map wins

17,300dust2

2,204nuke

1,696inferno

388lake

349train

297vertigo

176office

118cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.3%Headshot accuracy

37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.7%Spray accuracy

82.3%Counter-strafing

11.9°Preaim

599msReaction time

28.9%T opening success

54.2%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

5.9%Flash assists

5.66HE damage / grenade

3.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.2953% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4651 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.9031% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	16–14	0.01	16%	28 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.05	9%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.03	13%	28 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	8%	28 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.06	15%	28 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	12%	27 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	14%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.12	8%	23 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	11%	23 Aug →
dust2	3–13	0.00	28%	22 Aug →
nuke	12–12	0.03	8%	22 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.12	15%	20 Aug →
nuke	5–13	0.04	12%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.02	10%	14 Aug →
cache	5–13	0.02	11%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.00	15%	5 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.03	12%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.19	16%	5 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.05	9%	5 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.03	14%	5 Aug →
anubis	1–13	-0.04	13%	4 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.03	8%	4 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.03	19%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	18%	2 Aug →
anubis	3–13	0.07	15%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.12	15%	31 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.03	8%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.06	25%	30 Jul →
inferno	4–9	-0.05	25%	30 Jul →
inferno	9–2	0.15	22%	30 Jul →
inferno	5–9	-0.07	21%	30 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	7%	29 Jul →
inferno	4–9	-0.04	18%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	16%	29 Jul →
dust2	14–16	0.06	13%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.03	14%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.04	16%	26 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	15%	26 Jul →
mirage	3–13	0.06	11%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.16	23%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.03	18%	24 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.03	13%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.02	21%	24 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	14%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.03	6%	24 Jul →
anubis	16–12	0.03	22%	23 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.03	7%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.11	9%	22 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.04	29%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.04	18%	22 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.10	10%	21 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.09	17%	21 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.00	19%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.04	20%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–16	-0.03	15%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.03	26%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	19%	18 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.05	18%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.21	17%	17 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.02	18%	16 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.06	5%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–4	-0.02	13%	16 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.04	10%	16 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	12%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.09	18%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.07	16%	14 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.02	9%	14 Jul →
dust2	14–16	-0.01	20%	14 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.04	21%	14 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.03	17%	14 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.01	12%	14 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.02	9%	13 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.00	11%	13 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	9%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.07	20%	13 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	19%	13 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.06	7%	13 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.03	14%	13 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.07	12%	12 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.10	28%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	9%	12 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.00	8%	12 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.08	16%	12 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.03	11%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.08	15%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.01	13%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.06	5%	10 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.04	16%	10 Jul →
office	11–13	0.04	24%	8 Jul →
office	8–13	0.02	16%	8 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.02	21%	8 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.05	17%	7 Jul →
office	13–4	0.02	13%	7 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.02	6%	7 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.08	11%	7 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.03	9%	6 Jul →
overpass	13–10	-0.05	12%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	14%	6 Jul →
overpass	13–6	0.05	13%	30 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.02	19%	30 Jun →