noah — CS2 Stats

US76561198062332956[U:1:102067228]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

393Tracked matches37%Win rate2021Tracked since

1,151Hours in CS

CSDB Rating5.7 SolidAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=338), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 2 median	Level 3 median	vs Level 3
Headshot rate	29.0%	42.1%	42.1%	13.1% short
Shot accuracy	19.2%	12.9%	12.1%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.73	1.00	0.99	0.26 short
Match win rate	42.2%	42.9%	43.9%	1.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75

Positioning59

Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–48–5Last 10047%Win rateLLLLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.07 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.5

Aggression6.8

Utility3.4

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels4.6

Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5

Positioning5.9

Utility3.4

Mechanics8.1

Opening Duels4.6

Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time612ms−26ms

first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms

Headshot accuracy19.3%+1.8%

first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — dust2 13–1

13–1Biggest win — dust2

5Longest win streak

L5Current streak

9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 22% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	31	13–18	42%	0.00
mirage	A	18	10–8	56%	0.01
ancient	A	11	7–4	64%	0.00
nuke	B	11	5–6	45%	0.01
anubis	D	9	2–7	22%	-0.01
cache	C	7	3–4	43%	0.03
inferno	D	6	2–4	33%	0.06
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	0.02
vertigo	—	2	2–0	100%	0.08
train	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02
office	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

44,940Lifetime kills

0.73K/D

2,877Matches

42.2%Match win rate

29.0%Headshot %

19.2%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 2 players

4,276MVPs

1,151Hours (in match)

2,425Bombs planted

449Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4715,793

AWP6,362

M4A4 / M4A1-S4,924

P2000 / USP-S2,154

P901,727

Glock-181,583

SSG 081,551

P2501,131

FAMAS1,043

Desert Eagle961

Lifetime map wins

9,986dust2

1,397inferno

1,384nuke

326vertigo

267train

239office

200cbble

149dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

21Matches

38%Win rate

1.02Avg K/D

58.5ADR

38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win

14%1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	6	17%	0.85	13.0
Inferno	4	25%	1.08	12.3
Anubis	2	50%	0.68	10.0
Dust2	2	100%	1.10	10.0
Ancient	2	50%	0.80	9.5
Nuke	1	100%	1.75	14.0
Cache	1	100%	3.00	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy

36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.0%Spray accuracy

86.6%Counter-strafing

9.8°Preaim

618msReaction time

33.5%T opening success

63.2%CT opening success

0.54Enemies flashed / flash

5.6%Flash assists

9.43HE damage / grenade

3.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.0444 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.5448% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	9–13	0.04	30%	21 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.04	25%	5 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	15%	31 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.07	12%	31 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.10	22%	31 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.06	26%	30 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.05	23%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.15	34%	30 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.07	30%	30 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.04	22%	12 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.05	15%	11 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.02	45%	8 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.05	11%	8 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.02	20%	8 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.00	12%	7 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.01	7%	7 Jul →
ancient	13–4	-0.01	21%	6 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	21%	4 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	20%	4 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	18%	4 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.02	15%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.02	16%	28 Jun →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	11%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.04	18%	23 Jun →
nuke	7–13	0.00	16%	22 Jun →
nuke	16–12	-0.02	12%	18 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	21%	18 Jun →
inferno	8–8	0.14	9%	17 Jun →
train	5–13	0.02	25%	17 Jun →
vertigo	9–7	0.15	19%	17 Jun →
dust2	9–13	0.13	20%	17 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.04	12%	17 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.02	10%	16 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.08	23%	16 Jun →
anubis	10–13	0.01	18%	15 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	10%	15 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	20%	15 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.04	11%	13 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	11%	13 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	7%	12 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.02	20%	12 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.02	8%	8 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	32%	8 Jun →
anubis	8–13	-0.01	9%	8 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.03	17%	6 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	16%	6 Jun →
overpass	7–13	0.03	20%	6 Jun →
anubis	6–13	-0.02	10%	5 Jun →
mirage	15–15	-0.04	10%	5 Jun →
anubis	13–9	0.01	11%	5 Jun →
dust2	2–13	-0.07	15%	4 Jun →
anubis	2–13	-0.08	7%	4 Jun →
ancient	13–6	-0.05	19%	4 Jun →
mirage	16–14	-0.00	29%	3 Jun →
anubis	13–1	0.03	7%	3 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.07	13%	3 Jun →
anubis	9–13	0.01	10%	3 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	9%	3 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.01	26%	2 Jun →
ancient	3–13	0.02	19%	2 Jun →
nuke	4–13	-0.04	18%	2 Jun →
inferno	14–16	-0.01	11%	2 Jun →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	25%	31 May →
ancient	13–1	0.05	29%	31 May →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	11%	31 May →
ancient	13–11	0.02	13%	31 May →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	11%	30 May →
overpass	13–10	0.01	17%	30 May →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	19%	30 May →
mirage	13–10	0.10	20%	23 May →
nuke	13–2	0.05	24%	21 May →
mirage	15–15	0.02	21%	21 May →
nuke	13–4	0.09	5%	20 May →
nuke	13–10	0.00	12%	20 May →
ancient	7–3	0.00	30%	20 May →
inferno	13–7	0.04	23%	20 May →
mirage	13–3	0.06	11%	19 May →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	14%	19 May →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	28%	19 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	18%	14 May →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	20%	14 May →
mirage	9–13	0.03	15%	13 May →
dust2	3–13	-0.10	10%	13 May →
office	13–11	-0.03	13%	10 May →
dust2	13–7	0.07	15%	10 May →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	20%	10 May →
inferno	13–9	0.04	29%	10 May →
vertigo	13–11	0.02	14%	10 May →
cache	13–9	0.06	15%	10 May →
mirage	13–9	0.04	13%	8 May →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	23%	3 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	15%	26 Apr →
nuke	5–13	0.00	22%	25 Apr →
dust2	12–12	-0.02	11%	25 Apr →
dust2	13–5	0.06	12%	25 Apr →
ancient	13–4	0.00	23%	20 Apr →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	14%	19 Apr →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	23%	19 Apr →
overpass	13–11	0.02	16%	12 Apr →
dust2	12–12	-0.02	8%	30 Mar →