1M0rT4LoR4nG3

1M0rT4LoR4nG3 — CS2 Stats

PT76561198062249319[U:1:101983591]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,650Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,723Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,802Purple band · top ~25.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9792 of 15678 tracked
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate42.8%48.1%5.2% short
Shot accuracy13.9%12.9%above
Kill/death ratio1.091.08meets
Match win rate38.4%46.5%8.0% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG1M0rT4LoR4nG3PREMIER15,802 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning46
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49501Last 10049%Win rateWLLLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.4
Aggression4.6
Utility6.0
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.7

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning4.6
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time629ms+8ms
first ⅓ avg 620ms → last ⅓ avg 629ms
Headshot accuracy22.0%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — dust2 13–5
131Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 68% over 22anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB28131546%0.00
dust2C2591636%-0.00
mirageS2215768%-0.00
ancientB137654%0.01
anubisD62433%0.00
nukeA53260%0.01
cache1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

74,788Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
4,431Matches
38.4%Match win rate
42.8%Headshot %
13.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
7,878MVPs
1,723Hours (in match)
3,334Bombs planted
749Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,590
AWP8,278
MP94,204
MAC-102,111
FAMAS1,790

Lifetime map wins

6,236dust2
4,192inferno
1,752nuke
1,012vertigo
546train
410cbble
153safehouse
107ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
77.5%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
621msReaction time
26.0%T opening success
47.9%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
11.81HE damage / grenade
9.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.0267% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10-0.0230%18 Aug
dust27–13-0.0416%18 Aug
dust211–13-0.038%16 Aug
inferno3–130.0229%16 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0515%16 Aug
ancient13–60.0522%16 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0215%16 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0511%16 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0025%16 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0115%15 Aug
dust211–13-0.0126%15 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0411%15 Aug
dust26–13-0.0217%12 Aug
dust213–10-0.0233%12 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0519%12 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0126%12 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0435%12 Aug
cache11–130.0225%10 Aug
anubis6–130.0522%10 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0320%10 Aug
dust213–11-0.0515%9 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0115%9 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0332%9 Aug
dust213–10-0.0625%9 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0111%13 Jul
dust26–13-0.0321%13 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0129%14 Jun
inferno13–110.0022%3 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0440%26 May
ancient13–40.0325%26 May
inferno5–13-0.0030%21 May
dust213–50.1921%21 May
inferno13–80.0220%21 May
mirage13–40.1229%21 May
inferno8–13-0.0119%17 May
inferno13–9-0.0215%17 May
dust28–130.0217%17 May
dust214–16-0.0025%16 May
inferno7–130.0520%16 May
mirage6–13-0.0617%16 May
ancient13–8-0.0413%16 May
inferno8–13-0.0613%16 May
mirage6–13-0.0419%16 May
nuke13–160.0321%15 May
dust28–13-0.0128%14 May
mirage13–50.0316%14 May
mirage13–10-0.0127%13 May
dust214–160.0327%11 May
nuke13–60.0017%11 May
anubis15–150.0026%11 May
ancient5–130.0243%10 May
mirage13–100.0419%10 May
dust211–130.018%10 May
mirage13–7-0.0122%10 May
inferno10–13-0.066%10 May
mirage13–40.0611%10 May
ancient9–13-0.0225%9 May
mirage13–50.0725%9 May
ancient13–30.1421%9 May
inferno4–13-0.0211%9 May
dust22–130.0117%8 May
inferno5–130.0210%5 May
inferno13–10.1523%5 May
nuke13–110.0531%5 May
ancient9–13-0.0016%5 May
inferno16–140.0619%4 May
dust214–16-0.0223%2 May
ancient2–40.0529%2 May
mirage13–70.0222%2 May
inferno1–13-0.059%1 May
anubis13–50.0516%1 May
mirage13–60.0116%1 May
dust213–6-0.0539%1 May
inferno13–70.0318%1 May
ancient13–4-0.0311%27 Apr
dust23–13-0.0335%27 Apr
mirage1–130.0263%24 Apr
nuke2–13-0.0715%24 Apr
dust213–50.0010%24 Apr
inferno13–20.0228%24 Apr
inferno13–1-0.0021%23 Apr
dust213–4-0.055%23 Apr
dust22–13-0.0924%19 Apr
nuke13–100.0222%19 Apr
inferno3–13-0.087%8 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0813%2 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0433%1 Mar
inferno10–130.0218%15 Feb
dust213–50.0320%15 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0427%14 Feb
inferno16–120.0012%14 Feb
inferno8–130.0129%3 Feb
dust25–130.0633%3 Feb
dust213–80.0320%1 Feb
inferno13–90.0233%1 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0432%1 Feb
ancient13–60.0532%1 Feb
inferno13–10-0.0026%25 Jan
dust211–13-0.0119%25 Jan
inferno7–130.0516%25 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →