Apocalyptic Harrasment — CS2 Stats

76561198060953707[U:1:100687979]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,926Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,410Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating3.7 Learning

FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=673), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 2 median	Level 3 median	vs Level 3
Headshot rate	42.4%	41.2%	42.2%	meets
Shot accuracy	17.6%	12.5%	11.9%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.99	0.96	0.98	meets
Match win rate	30.1%	42.8%	43.6%	13.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim32

Positioning45

Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–45–12Last 10043%Win rateLLTWWWLTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.2

Aggression6.6

Utility5.0

Positioning4.5

Opening Duels1.5

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 657ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 63% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.2

Positioning4.5

Utility5.0

Mechanics3.0

Opening Duels1.5

Win Impact5.0

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.03

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time647ms−6ms

first ⅓ avg 653ms → last ⅓ avg 647ms

Headshot accuracy13.5%−3.1%

first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 13.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — debris 9–6

13–0Biggest win — cache

6Longest win streak

L2Current streak

6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 6debrisWeakest map · 38% over 32

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
debris	C	32	12–20	38%	-0.02
cache	C	26	11–15	42%	-0.02
eldorado	C	8	3–5	38%	-0.02
anubis	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.01
dust2	S	6	4–2	67%	0.03
ancient	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.01
mirage	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.04
office	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.03
nuke	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01
inferno	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.04
train	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.02
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.03
sanctum	—	1	0–1	0%	0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

187,726Lifetime kills

0.99K/D · Top 50% of Level 2 players

8,012Matches

30.1%Match win rate

42.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 2 players

17.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 2 players

15,727MVPs

2,151Hours (in match)

3,218Bombs planted

1,068Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4738,949

M4A4 / M4A1-S35,586

AWP26,972

SG 55314,860

Desert Eagle10,705

Galil AR6,739

FAMAS6,365

P2000 / USP-S6,178

AUG4,600

Glock-184,245

Lifetime map wins

14,663dust2

5,256inferno

2,881vertigo

2,723nuke

1,036train

286lake

205office

102safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.7%Headshot accuracy

30.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.0%Spray accuracy

63.4%Counter-strafing

10.6°Preaim

657msReaction time

30.2%T opening success

41.5%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

6.7%Flash assists

9.12HE damage / grenade

10.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.6553% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4925 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.2363% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
eldorado	6–9	-0.06	6%	18 Aug →
eldorado	2–9	0.00	8%	18 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.04	23%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.02	5%	18 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.00	10%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–4	-0.01	15%	16 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	3%	16 Aug →
anubis	12–12	-0.04	9%	16 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.04	16%	15 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	10%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.08	22%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	23%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.03	18%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.02	25%	15 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.01	19%	15 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.02	20%	15 Aug →
office	13–11	-0.07	7%	15 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.02	23%	14 Aug →
debris	0–9	-0.25	8%	14 Aug →
debris	2–9	-0.13	21%	14 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.10	6%	14 Aug →
eldorado	5–9	-0.03	10%	14 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.02	9%	14 Aug →
train	7–13	-0.07	19%	14 Aug →
train	13–6	0.02	17%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.05	12%	11 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.04	9%	11 Aug →
eldorado	2–9	-0.16	10%	9 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.08	4%	9 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.06	10%	9 Aug →
cache	0–5	-0.12	0%	9 Aug →
cache	0–9	-0.03	33%	9 Aug →
eldorado	9–5	0.14	18%	9 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.06	21%	8 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.01	26%	8 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.02	18%	8 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.03	12%	8 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.01	21%	7 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.05	15%	6 Aug →
cache	8–2	-0.03	21%	6 Aug →
debris	8–8	-0.00	24%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.01	17%	5 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.04	14%	5 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	10%	5 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	-0.06	23%	4 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	-0.01	16%	4 Aug →
debris	6–9	-0.06	18%	22 Jul →
eldorado	9–7	-0.10	10%	22 Jul →
anubis	12–12	-0.03	19%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.06	16%	22 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.06	13%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.05	22%	21 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.02	15%	21 Jul →
debris	8–8	-0.01	10%	21 Jul →
debris	7–9	-0.09	16%	21 Jul →
debris	0–9	-0.15	0%	21 Jul →
cache	1–6	-0.01	29%	21 Jul →
debris	9–5	0.12	13%	21 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.04	19%	14 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.07	10%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	13%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.04	17%	14 Jul →
debris	5–9	-0.19	3%	14 Jul →
eldorado	9–2	0.14	22%	14 Jul →
debris	9–3	0.04	21%	14 Jul →
debris	9–6	0.09	36%	14 Jul →
debris	9–2	0.12	41%	14 Jul →
debris	9–5	0.07	16%	14 Jul →
debris	8–8	0.03	17%	14 Jul →
debris	8–8	0.04	25%	14 Jul →
debris	9–4	0.08	12%	14 Jul →
debris	7–9	0.04	23%	14 Jul →
debris	4–9	-0.15	10%	13 Jul →
debris	3–9	-0.11	31%	13 Jul →
debris	9–4	0.04	18%	13 Jul →
debris	9–7	-0.03	7%	13 Jul →
debris	7–9	0.03	17%	13 Jul →
debris	4–9	-0.07	18%	13 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.00	12%	13 Jul →
debris	4–9	0.02	9%	12 Jul →
debris	2–9	-0.16	24%	12 Jul →
debris	9–7	-0.01	23%	12 Jul →
inferno	8–8	-0.07	24%	10 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.01	13%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.04	22%	10 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.06	17%	10 Jul →
debris	5–9	-0.05	8%	9 Jul →
debris	4–9	-0.06	26%	9 Jul →
debris	9–4	-0.02	12%	9 Jul →
debris	9–1	0.19	26%	9 Jul →
debris	7–9	-0.09	9%	9 Jul →
eldorado	6–9	-0.07	11%	9 Jul →
debris	9–6	0.19	26%	9 Jul →
office	12–12	0.02	5%	8 Jul →
office	13–9	-0.04	19%	8 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.01	25%	1 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.02	10%	1 Jul →
sanctum	8–8	0.08	9%	25 Jun →
cache	7–13	0.01	13%	24 Jun →
cache	13–0	0.05	13%	24 Jun →

Show all 100 matchesShow fewer

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

Explore CSDB.gg

Sensitivity ConverterConvert sensitivity between CS2 and other games eDPI CalculatorCalculate your effective DPI cm/360 CalculatorMouse distance per full turn Resolution CalculatorCompare aspect ratios and resolutions Crosshair GeneratorBuild and preview custom crosshairs

Tools

Sticker Craft MakerPlan and price a CS2 sticker craft with live prices on every piece CS2 Stats TrackerLook up any player: Premier rating, Faceit level, matches and skill breakdown Trust Factor CheckerEstimate your CS2 Trust Factor from the signals Valve has acknowledged

Learn & Explore

Most Traded CS2 SkinsRanked by completed sales — transaction data, not listings Cheapest Knives in CS2Every knife type ranked by its cheapest live price Cheapest Gloves in CS2Every glove model ranked by its cheapest live price