Legless Lego Legolas — CS2 Stats

76561198059920928[U:1:99655200]

533Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,115Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 Developing
Premier CS Rating9,221Light Blue band · top ~58.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20820 of 28108 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=404), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianBlue band medianvs Blue band
Headshot rate45.5%40.1%41.7%above
Shot accuracy18.3%7.6%8.8%above
Kill/death ratio1.100.920.97above
Match win rate40.1%42.2%43.8%3.7% short

This profile matches the typical Blue band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLegless Lego LegolasPREMIER9,221 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning56
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51472Last 10051%Win rateLLWLWWWLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.2
Aggression6.7
Utility5.7
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.78 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 672ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning5.6
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time672ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 665ms → last ⅓ avg 672ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — ancient 13–3
131Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B36191753%0.00
nukeC1771041%-0.03
ancientS1611569%0.00
mirageB136746%-0.03
cacheS75271%-0.02
infernoD61517%-0.03
anubis2020%0.01
overpass21150%0.02
office110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

102,817Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 25% of Light Blue band
5,289Matches
40.1%Match win rate
45.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of Light Blue band
18.3%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Light Blue band
8,107MVPs
1,795Hours (in match)
3,217Bombs planted
1,294Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

SSG 0814,903
AK-4712,910
AWP9,352
P2507,018
MAG-75,118
XM10142,587

Lifetime map wins

27,846dust2
1,764nuke
1,538inferno
859vertigo
807office
552train
497dust
386italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
30.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.2%Spray accuracy
80.6%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
672msReaction time
33.2%T opening success
48.8%CT opening success
0.78Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
14.07HE damage / grenade
6.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.1998% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke6–13-0.0321%24 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0026%24 Aug
ancient13–110.0320%24 Aug
dust210–130.0030%23 Aug
nuke13–50.1023%22 Aug
dust213–10-0.0116%22 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0313%22 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0111%21 Aug
nuke2–13-0.1218%20 Aug
dust215–150.0621%7 Aug
dust213–16-0.0320%7 Aug
cache1–13-0.1112%7 Aug
cache13–10-0.0513%4 Aug
inferno6–13-0.019%2 Aug
ancient13–100.0313%2 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0919%2 Aug
cache13–20.0615%2 Aug
office13–80.0326%2 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0216%1 Aug
dust213–60.0513%1 Aug
nuke8–130.0119%1 Aug
ancient13–30.1113%30 Jul
dust213–8-0.0517%30 Jul
dust28–13-0.0529%30 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0426%29 Jul
dust213–80.0817%29 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0022%29 Jul
cache10–13-0.0524%27 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0328%27 Jul
cache13–90.0224%25 Jul
dust216–120.0218%24 Jul
mirage7–130.0120%24 Jul
dust213–80.0524%22 Jul
dust22–130.0727%22 Jul
dust213–100.0225%21 Jul
dust213–90.0916%21 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0511%19 Jul
mirage13–70.0519%18 Jul
nuke11–13-0.028%18 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0518%18 Jul
nuke16–120.0222%18 Jul
cache13–80.0722%18 Jul
cache13–9-0.0523%17 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0835%17 Jul
dust215–150.0021%15 Jul
ancient13–70.0223%14 Jul
inferno13–7-0.029%14 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0410%12 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0023%12 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0724%12 Jul
dust213–6-0.0142%12 Jul
dust26–13-0.0614%12 Jul
inferno7–13-0.079%12 Jul
anubis11–130.0413%11 Jul
mirage13–30.0016%11 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0726%11 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0714%11 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0120%11 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0721%6 Jul
dust27–10.090%6 Jul
ancient13–70.0118%24 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0420%24 Jun
dust27–13-0.068%24 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0222%23 Jun
dust26–13-0.075%22 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0619%22 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0218%19 Jun
dust213–50.0615%19 Jun
dust26–13-0.0525%19 Jun
dust22–13-0.0225%19 Jun
dust22–13-0.0917%8 Jun
dust29–130.0124%7 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0413%7 Jun
dust213–11-0.079%7 Jun
dust213–9-0.0528%7 Jun
dust213–100.0217%6 Jun
ancient13–50.0024%6 Jun
dust26–13-0.0416%6 Jun
ancient13–40.0118%2 Jun
dust213–5-0.0614%2 Jun
ancient7–130.0110%1 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0413%1 Jun
dust27–13-0.0214%1 Jun
overpass13–11-0.015%31 May
dust27–13-0.0621%31 May
dust213–6-0.0235%31 May
anubis4–13-0.0210%30 May
dust213–30.0929%30 May
dust213–80.0426%30 May
nuke13–80.0124%29 May
ancient13–10.0424%29 May
dust213–70.0619%29 May
nuke11–13-0.0332%26 May
mirage13–4-0.0315%26 May
overpass10–130.0419%26 May
nuke13–7-0.0319%26 May
inferno8–13-0.0120%25 May
mirage13–6-0.0212%25 May
ancient4–13-0.1014%25 May
dust28–130.0334%25 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →