Joon — CS2 Stats

76561198054447988[U:1:94182260]

924Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

1,530Hours in CS

CSDB Rating5.9 Solid

Premier CS Rating18,798Purple band · top ~13.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#12500 of 25803 tracked

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=862), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 6 median	Level 7 median	vs Level 7
Headshot rate	43.8%	44.9%	46.2%	2.5% short
Shot accuracy	16.5%	11.8%	12.5%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.11	1.04	1.06	above
Match win rate	59.3%	45.3%	45.9%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56

Positioning58

Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–42–5Last 10053%Win rateWWWWLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.6

Aggression7.6

Utility7.0

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels3.5

Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 648ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6

Positioning5.8

Utility7.0

Mechanics7.9

Opening Duels3.5

Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time649ms+17ms

first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 649ms

Headshot accuracy13.0%−2.7%

first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 13.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — inferno 13–6

13–2Biggest win — inferno

8Longest win streak

W4Current streak

11–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	19	10–9	53%	-0.01
nuke	C	19	8–11	42%	0.01
inferno	S	17	12–5	71%	0.03
overpass	C	14	6–8	43%	-0.01
ancient	B	10	5–5	50%	-0.00
anubis	D	7	2–5	29%	0.00
mirage	S	6	5–1	83%	0.02
cache	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.01
train	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

79,492Lifetime kills

1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players

4,774Matches

59.3%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 6 players

43.8%Headshot %

16.5%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 6 players

11,744MVPs

1,530Hours (in match)

4,110Bombs planted

1,577Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4728,067

M4A4 / M4A1-S16,443

AWP8,437

P2000 / USP-S4,722

Desert Eagle3,526

Glock-182,962

FAMAS1,579

SSG 081,402

MP91,324

MAC-101,241

Lifetime map wins

5,660dust2

5,152inferno

2,981train

2,923nuke

1,359vertigo

1,085cbble

131office

106dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

271Matches

50%Win rate

1.13Avg K/D

83.1ADR

38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

50%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Train	2	50%	1.18	18.0
Anubis	1	100%	2.10	21.0
Mirage	1	100%	0.85	11.0
Nuke	1	0%	1.00	13.0
Dust2	1	100%	0.72	13.0
Ancient	1	100%	0.71	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.7%Headshot accuracy

32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.6%Spray accuracy

85.4%Counter-strafing

9.8°Preaim

648msReaction time

35.6%T opening success

52.6%CT opening success

0.66Enemies flashed / flash

11.2%Flash assists

11.74HE damage / grenade

11.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.6513% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.6032% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–11	-0.00	15%	27 May →
cache	13–9	0.07	18%	25 May →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	10%	25 May →
mirage	13–7	-0.07	9%	23 May →
inferno	2–13	-0.08	9%	23 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.11	20%	23 May →
train	13–8	0.00	23%	22 May →
cache	7–13	0.01	17%	22 May →
cache	11–13	-0.07	16%	22 May →
cache	13–8	0.03	20%	22 May →
cache	13–11	-0.07	16%	22 May →
mirage	13–7	0.05	13%	4 Apr →
overpass	9–13	-0.04	17%	4 Apr →
nuke	9–13	-0.09	23%	4 Apr →
inferno	8–8	0.01	6%	3 Apr →
nuke	10–13	-0.10	17%	26 Mar →
inferno	9–5	0.02	8%	26 Mar →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	5%	26 Mar →
overpass	5–13	-0.11	20%	26 Mar →
overpass	15–15	0.00	13%	25 Mar →
nuke	12–16	0.04	17%	25 Mar →
dust2	13–9	-0.05	0%	24 Mar →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	11%	24 Mar →
ancient	13–10	0.00	16%	24 Mar →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	8%	23 Mar →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	9%	22 Mar →
dust2	13–10	0.05	5%	22 Mar →
overpass	5–13	-0.00	8%	21 Mar →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	16%	21 Mar →
inferno	10–13	-0.00	15%	21 Mar →
ancient	13–10	-0.00	14%	20 Mar →
inferno	16–14	0.04	15%	20 Mar →
ancient	13–6	0.05	2%	19 Mar →
overpass	13–4	-0.05	9%	19 Mar →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	13%	19 Mar →
nuke	16–14	0.03	9%	18 Mar →
overpass	11–13	-0.01	16%	17 Mar →
inferno	16–14	0.03	17%	17 Mar →
dust2	3–13	-0.06	23%	17 Mar →
ancient	5–13	-0.00	7%	26 Feb →
dust2	6–13	0.01	5%	24 Feb →
nuke	11–13	0.03	13%	24 Feb →
overpass	13–5	-0.02	16%	23 Feb →
anubis	6–13	0.01	11%	23 Feb →
nuke	8–13	0.03	11%	23 Feb →
nuke	13–11	0.02	10%	23 Feb →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	9%	23 Feb →
mirage	13–7	0.04	22%	23 Feb →
nuke	13–10	0.04	18%	23 Feb →
dust2	11–13	0.04	21%	23 Feb →
inferno	13–11	0.04	15%	23 Feb →
anubis	6–13	0.03	12%	19 Feb →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	20%	19 Feb →
nuke	13–7	0.10	11%	19 Feb →
overpass	13–10	-0.02	12%	18 Feb →
inferno	13–2	0.11	9%	18 Feb →
inferno	13–8	0.05	11%	18 Feb →
anubis	9–13	0.07	7%	16 Feb →
dust2	10–13	0.05	16%	16 Feb →
anubis	4–13	-0.09	14%	16 Feb →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	23%	15 Feb →
dust2	16–14	0.01	11%	15 Feb →
ancient	13–9	-0.00	14%	15 Feb →
anubis	13–6	0.05	9%	15 Feb →
inferno	13–4	-0.00	15%	10 Feb →
inferno	13–10	0.07	20%	9 Feb →
ancient	16–13	0.02	11%	8 Feb →
overpass	16–13	-0.00	11%	8 Feb →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	20%	8 Feb →
nuke	14–16	0.02	11%	8 Feb →
overpass	13–9	0.01	17%	7 Feb →
nuke	7–13	0.02	17%	7 Feb →
dust2	13–4	-0.02	13%	7 Feb →
mirage	13–9	0.04	11%	7 Feb →
overpass	11–13	-0.02	19%	7 Feb →
nuke	16–14	0.02	11%	6 Feb →
ancient	5–13	-0.07	11%	6 Feb →
nuke	13–5	0.03	11%	6 Feb →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	9%	5 Feb →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	17%	23 Jan →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	14%	22 Jan →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	14%	22 Jan →
anubis	15–15	-0.01	14%	22 Jan →
dust2	9–0	0.06	22%	22 Jan →
dust2	13–8	0.11	25%	20 Jan →
nuke	7–13	0.06	11%	20 Jan →
inferno	13–6	0.13	8%	18 Jan →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	10%	18 Jan →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	18%	18 Jan →
vertigo	13–9	-0.00	49%	17 Jan →
inferno	13–10	0.03	18%	17 Jan →
overpass	15–15	-0.01	14%	17 Jan →
mirage	13–8	0.10	9%	17 Jan →
inferno	13–10	0.12	14%	16 Jan →
overpass	6–13	0.02	13%	16 Jan →
train	4–13	0.02	25%	13 Jan →
overpass	13–9	0.04	16%	13 Jan →
nuke	3–13	0.00	16%	13 Jan →
ancient	11–13	0.04	24%	12 Jan →
nuke	13–10	0.05	11%	9 Jan →