MiiZtaH_Jam

MiiZtaH_Jam — CS2 Stats

NO76561198052802783[U:1:92537055]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

283Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
654Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.8 Developing
Premier CS Rating16,658Purple band · top ~21.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18103 of 32125 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=2,789), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate30.2%44.1%47.2%17.1% short
Shot accuracy14.1%11.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.101.031.09meets
Match win rate48.5%45.2%46.6%above

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMiiZtaH_JamPREMIER16,658 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48
Positioning34
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52462Last 10052%Win rateLWLWWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.8
Aggression3.4
Utility6.6
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 14% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8
Positioning3.4
Utility6.6
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time620ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms
Headshot accuracy10.6%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 13.1% → last ⅓ avg 10.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–3
130Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 10vertigoWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA22121055%0.00
vertigoD1551033%-0.02
infernoA148657%-0.01
ancientD124833%-0.03
dust2A127558%-0.03
anubisB105550%-0.02
nukeS108280%-0.00
overpass32167%0.04
train21150%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

27,716Lifetime kills
1.10K/D · Top 50% of Purple band
1,436Matches
48.5%Match win rate · Top 25% of Purple band
30.2%Headshot %
14.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Purple band
2,977MVPs
654Hours (in match)
1,076Bombs planted
329Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

8,388inferno
422vertigo
415nuke
334dust2
54train
19cbble
18safehouse
16ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.0%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.2%Spray accuracy
81.0%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
607msReaction time
14.5%T opening success
50.8%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
11.24HE damage / grenade
10.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 9.9972% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 14.4546% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategyVertigo grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient4–13-0.0816%2 Dec
inferno13–9-0.075%18 Mar
inferno4–13-0.059%11 Mar
inferno13–50.0011%11 Mar
ancient13–80.021%6 Mar
dust210–13-0.019%4 Mar
ancient11–13-0.039%4 Mar
anubis3–13-0.1415%4 Mar
inferno13–70.068%4 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0216%4 Mar
inferno7–130.0211%28 Feb
mirage13–40.0310%28 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0411%28 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0712%28 Feb
nuke5–13-0.099%25 Feb
inferno13–10-0.027%25 Feb
nuke13–6-0.062%23 Feb
dust213–11-0.018%23 Feb
dust27–13-0.0222%23 Feb
train9–13-0.073%22 Feb
ancient8–13-0.124%22 Feb
dust26–13-0.067%22 Feb
nuke13–30.0211%22 Feb
ancient13–3-0.020%11 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0110%11 Feb
mirage13–3-0.0212%11 Feb
mirage16–14-0.0118%11 Feb
anubis5–13-0.0621%30 Jan
train13–7-0.0210%30 Jan
mirage13–4-0.0110%30 Jan
dust210–130.0122%29 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0013%29 Jan
inferno13–10-0.0415%28 Jan
dust213–90.0017%15 May
dust21–13-0.133%15 May
vertigo7–13-0.0411%14 May
vertigo15–150.0013%14 May
dust23–1-0.020%10 May
nuke13–20.0210%10 May
mirage10–13-0.0014%10 May
ancient13–6-0.049%9 May
dust213–3-0.0120%9 May
mirage2–110.015%9 May
dust213–60.008%9 May
anubis13–8-0.026%8 May
nuke13–100.0112%8 May
dust213–00.000%7 May
inferno13–6-0.0113%7 May
anubis13–100.0013%7 May
vertigo13–60.0511%4 May
ancient7–130.0615%4 May
inferno13–30.0311%3 May
ancient11–130.054%2 May
vertigo13–2-0.0213%2 May
vertigo13–5-0.0215%2 May
mirage13–10-0.018%2 May
anubis13–160.027%2 May
vertigo14–160.0310%2 May
ancient3–13-0.0612%2 May
mirage2–130.017%30 Apr
vertigo8–13-0.087%30 Apr
dust213–9-0.1018%30 Apr
anubis13–110.038%30 Apr
inferno10–13-0.075%29 Apr
vertigo9–130.0210%29 Apr
vertigo8–13-0.117%25 Apr
mirage15–150.0210%25 Apr
overpass16–14-0.0112%24 Apr
nuke13–80.033%24 Apr
vertigo7–13-0.048%24 Apr
vertigo13–110.0510%23 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0813%23 Apr
ancient11–13-0.016%23 Apr
vertigo0–13-0.0721%22 Apr
mirage12–16-0.0716%22 Apr
vertigo14–160.0212%22 Apr
overpass6–130.018%19 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0212%19 Apr
mirage13–60.076%19 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0930%19 Apr
inferno1–13-0.080%19 Apr
mirage8–40.0835%19 Apr
vertigo8–13-0.0421%19 Apr
mirage3–13-0.015%18 Apr
vertigo13–2-0.0711%18 Apr
mirage5–4-0.0420%18 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0422%18 Apr
mirage13–30.1320%18 Apr
ancient13–9-0.076%18 Apr
mirage10–5-0.069%18 Apr
anubis10–10.107%18 Apr
mirage6–130.0415%18 Apr
inferno7–130.0314%18 Apr
mirage8–130.0117%18 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0010%17 Apr
overpass13–60.1216%17 Apr
nuke16–140.0214%17 Apr
inferno13–40.0912%17 Apr
inferno8–13-0.044%16 Apr
nuke7–20.0117%16 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →