Hadderajan — CS2 Stats

76561198048929175[U:1:88663447]

725Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,446Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,251Purple band · top ~23.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19650 of 34077 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=607), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate28.4%42.1%42.5%14.0% short
Shot accuracy22.1%12.1%10.9%above
Kill/death ratio0.930.990.990.07 short
Match win rate44.6%43.9%44.2%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHadderajanFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER16,251 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning48
Utility11

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49465Last 10049%Win rateWLWWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1
Aggression6.2
Utility1.1
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.9

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 629ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.8
Utility1.1
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time632ms+14ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 632ms
Headshot accuracy10.8%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 11.4% → last ⅓ avg 10.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — nuke 13–8
131Biggest win — anubis
5Longest win streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 57% over 44anubisWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA44251957%-0.01
ancientC1771041%-0.00
nukeB126650%-0.01
anubisC83538%-0.01
overpass41325%-0.04
mirage43175%0.01
cache32167%-0.03
train31233%-0.03
dust221150%-0.02
office2020%-0.02
vertigo1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

57,470Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
3,440Matches
44.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
28.4%Headshot %
22.1%Shot accuracy · Top 1% of Level 3 players
6,839MVPs
1,446Hours (in match)
1,882Bombs planted
591Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4717,466
AWP4,368
FAMAS2,036
P2501,857
P901,348

Lifetime map wins

10,869inferno
2,113vertigo
1,683nuke
1,611dust2
1,414train
1,216cbble
733office
324assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.3%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
86.3%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
629msReaction time
30.6%T opening success
44.2%CT opening success
0.20Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
7.70HE damage / grenade
1.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.2683% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2008 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.6033% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–6-0.016%7 Jul
cache10–13-0.038%7 Jul
cache13–4-0.0510%7 Jul
inferno16–140.0115%11 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0114%10 Jan
overpass14–16-0.0610%5 Oct
ancient13–5-0.0311%5 Oct
nuke13–8-0.0710%5 Oct
nuke11–13-0.047%23 Aug
overpass2–13-0.0512%23 Aug
ancient13–100.118%23 Aug
nuke16–140.018%18 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0516%18 Aug
nuke7–13-0.098%6 Aug
ancient2–13-0.093%6 Aug
dust24–13-0.057%6 Aug
inferno13–20.0120%6 Aug
inferno16–12-0.003%5 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0111%5 Aug
ancient7–130.0114%13 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0215%13 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0523%13 Jul
inferno13–40.035%13 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0710%13 Jul
inferno13–60.038%13 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0514%13 Jul
nuke4–13-0.038%7 Jul
inferno13–50.0410%5 Jul
ancient13–40.0311%5 Jul
inferno13–10-0.018%4 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0120%4 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0016%4 Jul
ancient13–80.0312%3 Jul
anubis6–13-0.055%3 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0412%1 Jul
inferno13–60.059%1 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0117%1 Jul
mirage9–130.0213%12 Jun
inferno13–50.0412%12 Jun
anubis9–130.0323%12 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0111%11 Jun
inferno13–11-0.058%11 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0515%8 Jun
office11–13-0.0315%8 Jun
dust213–30.0213%8 Jun
inferno9–130.0114%5 Jun
train13–40.0212%5 Jun
inferno12–12-0.0410%5 Jun
inferno1–4-0.0210%5 Jun
inferno13–50.0613%5 Jun
nuke13–80.1116%2 Jun
train7–13-0.0414%30 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0411%30 Apr
nuke8–13-0.036%30 Apr
anubis13–10.0313%30 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0314%25 Apr
ancient13–90.107%24 Apr
inferno10–130.0219%24 Apr
inferno0–3-0.060%24 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0210%22 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0812%22 Apr
ancient8–13-0.095%16 Apr
inferno13–11-0.046%16 Apr
inferno13–9-0.029%16 Apr
inferno15–15-0.018%4 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0313%4 Apr
inferno13–50.0515%4 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0210%4 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0517%3 Apr
inferno10–13-0.079%3 Apr
inferno13–30.0311%3 Apr
inferno10–13-0.017%29 Mar
ancient13–4-0.0110%29 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0124%27 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0510%20 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0412%20 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0417%20 Mar
anubis10–13-0.0015%14 Mar
inferno13–20.0718%14 Mar
vertigo6–13-0.029%11 Mar
inferno2–10-0.033%11 Mar
inferno13–11-0.048%11 Mar
ancient7–130.0610%8 Mar
overpass13–3-0.0116%8 Mar
inferno13–90.0217%8 Mar
train12–12-0.070%8 Mar
inferno13–110.0012%7 Mar
inferno13–80.009%6 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0117%5 Mar
overpass8–13-0.049%5 Mar
inferno3–13-0.0816%1 Mar
ancient5–130.025%1 Mar
nuke13–40.0111%1 Mar
mirage13–70.1017%28 Feb
office5–13-0.016%28 Feb
nuke16–130.037%28 Feb
mirage13–11-0.038%27 Feb
anubis13–40.0011%27 Feb
ancient13–6-0.027%27 Feb
inferno16–12-0.0219%27 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →