Honoré de Balzac

Honoré de Balzac — CS2 Stats

76561198046489049[U:1:86223321]Steam profile ↗

221Tracked matches40%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,451Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.4 Developing
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=338), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate43.9%42.1%42.1%above
Shot accuracy12.4%12.9%12.1%above
Kill/death ratio0.941.000.990.05 short
Match win rate40.4%42.9%43.9%3.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHonoré de BalzacFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning46
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47512Last 10047%Win rateLWLLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.3
Aggression6.3
Utility5.4
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning4.6
Utility5.4
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time607ms−62ms
first ⅓ avg 669ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy12.1%−4.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 12.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — anubis 13–16
131Biggest win — dust2
9Longest win streak
118In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 7nukeWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB24111346%-0.00
dust2C2291341%-0.02
nukeD113827%0.02
anubisS107370%0.03
ancientB84450%-0.01
infernoS75271%0.00
cacheC52340%-0.03
vertigoA53260%-0.00
train42250%0.02
cache_b31233%0.02
overpass1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,293Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
1,903Matches
40.4%Match win rate
43.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 2 players
12.4%Shot accuracy
3,221MVPs
792Hours (in match)
1,972Bombs planted
391Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,579dust2
2,761inferno
1,421nuke
1,004vertigo
413train
129cbble
80aztec
36dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.2%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
70.9%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
599msReaction time
28.8%T opening success
45.5%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
9.87HE damage / grenade
8.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.1572% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.811% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage17–19-0.0217%24 Aug
ancient13–11-0.037%22 Aug
dust28–13-0.059%22 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0415%22 Aug
anubis13–60.0110%22 Aug
cache16–13-0.0413%22 Aug
mirage20–22-0.0912%22 Aug
vertigo4–13-0.0810%20 Aug
ancient7–13-0.078%20 Aug
dust24–13-0.055%19 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0018%19 Aug
dust213–40.0915%19 Aug
inferno13–100.005%19 Aug
inferno13–20.0312%17 Aug
mirage8–130.007%17 Aug
inferno16–14-0.036%16 Aug
mirage13–11-0.096%16 Aug
dust220–22-0.067%16 Aug
nuke3–13-0.025%16 Aug
dust213–11-0.0920%9 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0113%9 Aug
cache16–13-0.0214%9 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0412%9 Aug
mirage9–13-0.036%9 Aug
dust29–13-0.0518%9 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0210%9 Aug
nuke10–13-0.068%27 Jul
dust213–9-0.0418%27 Jul
mirage7–130.0217%27 Jul
cache10–13-0.039%27 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0122%28 Jun
inferno13–40.0624%16 Jun
cache9–13-0.0423%16 Jun
mirage11–130.0216%10 Jun
mirage13–60.089%31 May
nuke10–130.0715%24 May
mirage4–130.0418%24 May
cache11–13-0.0018%14 May
cache_b13–16-0.0015%15 Jan
dust210–13-0.059%15 Jan
mirage13–3-0.0110%11 Jan
dust28–13-0.0218%11 Jan
ancient15–19-0.0111%5 Jan
mirage13–9-0.0316%5 Jan
dust213–5-0.0516%5 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0419%5 Jan
cache_b7–13-0.0123%28 Oct
dust27–130.0111%28 Oct
vertigo13–80.1010%27 Oct
nuke13–90.0913%27 Oct
dust216–130.048%27 Oct
mirage13–50.0122%27 Oct
cache_b13–40.0610%26 Oct
mirage13–110.0710%26 Oct
vertigo13–4-0.009%26 Oct
dust213–70.0810%26 Oct
nuke13–70.119%26 Oct
nuke10–130.0210%25 Oct
dust212–16-0.0111%25 Oct
mirage16–140.0910%23 Oct
mirage1–13-0.0819%26 Aug
train4–13-0.0319%24 Aug
overpass6–13-0.027%23 Aug
dust25–13-0.0313%5 Jun
anubis13–40.0810%20 Mar
anubis13–160.1421%19 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0110%10 Mar
ancient5–13-0.108%9 Mar
train9–130.0030%3 Mar
dust216–140.0114%2 Mar
mirage13–16-0.0623%2 Mar
train13–90.037%1 Mar
dust28–130.0119%1 Mar
anubis13–110.0514%26 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0013%25 Feb
anubis13–9-0.0411%24 Feb
mirage13–20.1015%24 Feb
dust213–5-0.0618%24 Feb
inferno13–110.007%22 Feb
nuke3–13-0.034%22 Feb
dust25–13-0.1124%22 Feb
ancient13–10-0.019%16 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0819%8 Feb
vertigo13–110.0223%5 Jan
anubis15–15-0.0612%5 Jan
anubis9–13-0.0421%29 Dec
inferno6–13-0.048%29 Dec
anubis13–110.0714%29 Dec
dust29–13-0.0322%29 Dec
vertigo11–13-0.0517%24 Nov
nuke13–90.0315%24 Nov
nuke11–130.0816%18 Nov
dust215–15-0.0214%14 Nov
train13–80.0618%14 Nov
anubis13–50.0525%12 Nov
dust213–10.0432%11 Nov
mirage13–60.0418%5 Nov
anubis13–70.0715%5 Nov
nuke10–130.0123%2 Nov
ancient13–40.1116%2 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →