Mokkaluder — CS2 Stats

76561198041763407[U:1:81497679]✓ No bans

2,908Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
7,500Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,176Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8428 of 29797 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,748 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,109), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate55.2%49.0%52.0%above
Shot accuracy17.0%13.1%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.011.081.080.07 short
Match win rate56.1%46.9%48.8%above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMokkaluderFACEITLevel 9 · 1,748 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,176 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning29
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48448Last 10048%Win rateTTWLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9
Aggression2.8
Utility5.5
Positioning2.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 50 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning2.9
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels0.2
Win Impact3.6

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time601ms+4ms
first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 601ms
Headshot accuracy24.2%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 23.8% → last ⅓ avg 24.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — nuke 13–4
132Biggest win — cache
7Longest win streak
54In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 74% over 23dust2Weakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2317674%0.01
infernoA22121055%0.00
cacheB179853%-0.01
ancientC1661038%0.00
anubisD92722%-0.03
mirageD82625%-0.03
dust2D5050%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

315,345Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
15,268Matches
56.1%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 9 players
55.2%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 9 players
17.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
34,088MVPs
6,473Hours (in match)
6,047Bombs planted
2,505Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47122,370
AWP27,937
P2506,191
MAC-103,976
FAMAS3,816

Lifetime map wins

21,004inferno
15,501nuke
9,593dust2
6,872vertigo
4,853train
1,659cbble
199office
166lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,026Matches
51%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
74.8ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5153%1.0014.8
Nuke3863%1.0814.7
Ancient2741%0.9815.2
Mirage2143%0.9014.1
Overpass1547%1.0217.0
Train850%1.1914.1
Dust2875%0.9115.0
Vertigo875%1.1715.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.0%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
80.8%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
609msReaction time
25.9%T opening success
31.9%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
5.82HE damage / grenade
9.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.9249% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke15–150.1021%28 Aug
ancient15–15-0.039%28 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0240%28 Aug
cache3–13-0.1127%28 Aug
cache16–120.0333%28 Aug
inferno13–100.0531%26 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0427%26 Aug
dust29–13-0.0323%26 Aug
inferno13–70.0924%24 Aug
inferno13–80.0017%22 Aug
dust24–13-0.0325%22 Aug
nuke13–110.0222%22 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0424%22 Aug
inferno0–6-0.0143%21 Aug
nuke13–40.1020%21 Aug
dust26–13-0.0831%21 Aug
cache15–150.0033%21 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0133%21 Aug
ancient11–130.0322%21 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0020%21 Aug
anubis4–13-0.065%20 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0125%20 Aug
dust25–13-0.0524%20 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0716%17 Aug
inferno15–150.0330%17 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0421%15 Aug
cache5–130.0225%15 Aug
mirage15–150.0013%15 Aug
inferno15–150.0322%15 Aug
nuke13–60.0029%15 Aug
ancient9–130.0325%15 Aug
cache10–13-0.0220%15 Aug
nuke13–90.0419%14 Aug
inferno13–40.0230%14 Aug
anubis13–90.0330%14 Aug
cache8–130.0133%14 Aug
inferno13–50.0524%14 Aug
cache6–13-0.0817%14 Aug
anubis4–13-0.1050%14 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0120%12 Aug
nuke13–40.0632%12 Aug
cache16–130.0342%12 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0039%10 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0718%10 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0438%10 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0411%8 Aug
anubis0–4-0.0120%8 Aug
inferno15–150.0229%8 Aug
nuke1–13-0.1113%8 Aug
inferno13–110.0329%8 Aug
cache13–11-0.0026%8 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0530%8 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0415%8 Aug
cache13–2-0.0333%8 Aug
nuke13–40.0329%7 Aug
ancient13–40.0624%7 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0125%7 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0218%6 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0117%6 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0020%6 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0415%6 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0041%1 Aug
nuke13–50.0115%29 Jul
dust24–13-0.0523%29 Jul
anubis9–130.0626%29 Jul
ancient13–60.0322%29 Jul
cache4–13-0.0311%28 Jul
cache13–11-0.0136%28 Jul
nuke13–40.0637%28 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0625%28 Jul
ancient13–60.0721%28 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0424%27 Jul
nuke13–80.0535%27 Jul
cache6–130.0838%23 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0311%23 Jul
inferno13–80.0121%23 Jul
cache13–80.0727%23 Jul
ancient13–110.0932%23 Jul
cache13–10-0.0521%23 Jul
nuke13–40.0125%23 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0519%23 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0627%22 Jul
ancient13–80.0018%22 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0017%22 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0233%22 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0327%22 Jul
cache13–50.0122%22 Jul
inferno14–16-0.079%20 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0110%20 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0017%20 Jul
nuke13–60.0919%20 Jul
nuke13–3-0.0822%20 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0519%20 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0639%20 Jul
inferno13–20.0824%20 Jul
nuke6–130.0221%18 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0712%18 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0229%18 Jul
nuke10–130.0133%18 Jul
cache13–10-0.0217%18 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →