Slim Thick Backshot Machine

Slim Thick Backshot Machine — CS2 Stats

US76561198041366157[U:1:81100429]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,441Tracked matches52%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,940Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#22075 of 23474 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,718 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

1,718Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,718
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 33 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,146), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate58.6%47.2%49.0%above
Shot accuracy8.8%12.3%13.1%4.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.441.071.08above
Match win rate49.7%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSlim Thick Backshot Machi…FACEITLevel 8 · 1,718 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,718csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning59
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51454Last 10051%Win rateWWWWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.6
Aggression9.6
Utility4.9
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.9
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time607ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy26.8%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 26.3% → last ⅓ avg 26.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — inferno 13–3
131Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
W5Current streak
811In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6nukeWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2213959%0.01
dust2C1881044%0.01
infernoB179853%0.03
ancientA138562%0.04
nukeD113827%0.04
anubisC73443%0.01
cacheS64267%0.03
poseidonC52340%0.03
vertigo110100%0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

60,431Lifetime kills
1.44K/D · Top 10% of Level 8 players
2,441Matches
49.7%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
58.6%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
8.8%Shot accuracy
7,007MVPs
881Hours (in match)
976Bombs planted
781Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,903
AWP5,884
MP91,873
Tec-91,388
XM10141,060

Lifetime map wins

7,008dust2
2,687inferno
1,717nuke
880vertigo
840train
64cbble
29office
19safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

106Matches
58%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
92.8ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
36%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3262%1.3320.7
Dust22556%1.2518.5
Anubis1362%1.2018.3
Nuke1258%1.2519.2
Ancient1040%0.9816.8
Inferno743%1.2716.9
Vertigo560%1.0415.8
Overpass2100%1.8922.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.5%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
82.6%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
609msReaction time
38.5%T opening success
59.3%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
8.5%Flash assists
9.19HE damage / grenade
5.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.4933% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno16–130.0524%27 Aug
nuke13–60.0224%27 Aug
vertigo13–50.1419%16 Aug
mirage13–20.0217%14 Aug
mirage13–50.0327%14 Aug
ancient11–130.0418%14 Aug
mirage2–13-0.1010%6 Aug
ancient16–120.0835%4 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0122%3 Aug
inferno11–130.0332%3 Aug
ancient14–160.0826%20 Jul
dust213–110.0420%20 Jul
cache13–100.0136%7 Jul
cache13–40.0544%7 Jul
inferno13–30.1824%7 Jul
cache13–11-0.0123%6 Jul
dust213–70.0626%29 Jun
inferno11–130.0726%29 Jun
poseidon7–9-0.0750%21 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0019%29 May
dust26–13-0.0426%25 May
dust27–130.0219%25 May
cache3–130.0340%29 Apr
cache12–120.0633%29 Apr
cache13–50.0648%29 Apr
ancient4–130.0121%29 Mar
ancient16–140.0328%13 Mar
inferno1–13-0.0533%25 Feb
ancient13–30.1022%25 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0128%24 Feb
inferno8–130.0921%24 Feb
inferno13–50.0532%24 Feb
mirage16–140.0813%23 Feb
inferno13–16-0.0418%22 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0225%14 Feb
inferno13–40.0627%14 Feb
nuke5–13-0.0318%14 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0610%14 Feb
mirage13–80.0617%13 Feb
mirage7–130.0027%13 Feb
mirage13–40.0824%13 Feb
nuke11–130.1426%13 Feb
dust215–150.0428%13 Feb
mirage13–20.0227%13 Feb
inferno13–70.0331%12 Feb
dust214–160.0320%12 Feb
dust214–16-0.0321%12 Feb
dust213–80.0416%12 Feb
mirage13–30.0228%12 Feb
inferno13–30.0524%12 Feb
poseidon3–9-0.0938%10 Feb
inferno9–70.0532%10 Feb
nuke6–120.0128%10 Feb
dust213–9-0.0234%10 Feb
nuke5–130.0434%9 Feb
dust211–13-0.0432%9 Feb
dust22–13-0.0621%9 Feb
ancient16–140.0629%9 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0120%9 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0222%9 Feb
dust213–80.0525%9 Feb
nuke4–13-0.0221%7 Feb
nuke13–30.1432%7 Feb
mirage13–60.0720%6 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0418%6 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0535%4 Feb
anubis13–40.0814%1 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0026%1 Feb
dust213–90.0727%31 Jan
anubis13–110.0433%30 Jan
mirage10–130.0336%30 Jan
dust213–20.0014%30 Jan
nuke13–60.0656%29 Jan
poseidon9–50.1571%29 Jan
poseidon9–30.1436%29 Jan
dust29–130.0327%28 Jan
mirage13–80.0631%28 Jan
nuke13–160.0316%27 Jan
inferno16–130.0420%27 Jan
ancient13–10.0924%27 Jan
ancient13–100.0622%24 Jan
mirage13–90.0333%24 Jan
ancient13–8-0.0314%24 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0125%24 Jan
anubis4–13-0.0427%23 Jan
nuke11–130.0317%22 Jan
anubis16–130.0221%22 Jan
ancient13–100.0123%22 Jan
poseidon8–80.0326%22 Jan
dust213–30.0816%22 Jan
anubis11–13-0.0213%22 Jan
dust28–13-0.0018%22 Jan
mirage19–150.0724%21 Jan
nuke13–160.0726%21 Jan
dust26–13-0.0030%17 Jan
inferno4–9-0.1423%14 Jan
inferno9–60.1040%14 Jan
ancient12–12-0.0128%14 Jan
anubis7–13-0.0112%13 Jan
inferno5–13-0.0514%12 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →