n0o $tres — CS2 Stats

76561198033740017[U:1:73474289]

798Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,857Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,109), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 9 median	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	50.3%	49.0%	52.0%	1.7% short
Shot accuracy	17.1%	13.1%	13.7%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.98	1.08	1.08	0.10 short
Match win rate	45.1%	46.9%	48.8%	3.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80

Positioning36

Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD39–61Last 10039%Win rateLLLLLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0

Aggression5.6

Utility4.0

Positioning3.6

Opening Duels1.1

Clutch4.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0

Positioning3.6

Utility4.0

Mechanics7.4

Opening Duels1.4

Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05−0.05

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.05

Reaction time512ms−95ms

first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 512ms

Headshot accuracy16.8%−0.9%

first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–5

13–0Biggest win — mirage

3Longest win streak

L9Current streak

6–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 33nukeWeakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	33	21–12	64%	0.01
dust2	D	21	7–14	33%	-0.03
inferno	D	15	5–10	33%	-0.01
ancient	D	10	3–7	30%	-0.00
nuke	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.10
anubis	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.02
cache	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.03
train	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.05
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.01
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

172,661Lifetime kills

0.98K/D

8,156Matches

45.1%Match win rate

50.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players

17.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players

22,834MVPs

3,528Hours (in match)

6,081Bombs planted

1,905Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4761,996

M4A4 / M4A1-S45,112

P2000 / USP-S13,164

AWP12,462

Desert Eagle9,218

Glock-185,335

P2505,256

FAMAS2,409

Knife2,338

MP91,766

Lifetime map wins

13,642dust2

8,709inferno

4,333train

2,849nuke

1,438cbble

924vertigo

45dust

37office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,487Matches

50%Win rate

1.03Avg K/D

76.8ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	70	63%	1.15	15.6
Dust2	49	47%	1.03	14.9
Inferno	28	68%	1.24	15.7
Ancient	25	44%	0.97	14.4
Nuke	12	25%	1.13	18.6
Cache	10	40%	1.09	16.8
Anubis	9	11%	0.81	12.4
Overpass	2	100%	1.02	20.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy

32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.7%Spray accuracy

83.3%Counter-strafing

7.1°Preaim

562msReaction time

27.6%T opening success

41.2%CT opening success

0.60Enemies flashed / flash

7.0%Flash assists

8.06HE damage / grenade

2.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 2.8121 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.641% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	9–13	0.02	18%	25 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.09	40%	25 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.01	17%	24 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.11	33%	24 Aug →
nuke	1–9	-0.30	0%	17 Aug →
train	10–13	-0.07	18%	12 Aug →
train	9–13	-0.02	27%	12 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	20%	10 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	24%	5 Aug →
mirage	3–1	-0.12	20%	5 Aug →
inferno	1–5	-0.05	40%	5 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.09	0%	5 Aug →
mirage	7–0	-0.00	11%	5 Aug →
dust2	0–4	-0.07	0%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	15%	3 Aug →
vertigo	10–13	-0.01	21%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	19%	2 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.02	18%	2 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	-0.02	28%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–0	-0.02	29%	1 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.05	15%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.00	8%	25 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.02	5%	25 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.05	24%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.03	25%	23 Jul →
nuke	0–9	-0.23	0%	23 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.06	0%	23 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.10	11%	22 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.08	15%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.06	8%	21 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	11%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.04	18%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.02	16%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	23%	20 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	11%	19 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.07	22%	18 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.03	31%	18 Jul →
dust2	16–14	-0.03	22%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.06	22%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	20%	18 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	17%	18 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	20%	18 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.04	21%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.00	40%	16 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	22%	14 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.02	19%	14 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.01	19%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.02	22%	14 Jul →
cache	14–16	-0.05	14%	14 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.03	21%	14 Jul →
poseidon	6–9	-0.08	33%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.04	18%	13 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	32%	13 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	14%	13 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.10	8%	13 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	6%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.06	13%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.01	22%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.07	23%	13 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.01	17%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	21%	12 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.06	8%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–16	0.01	17%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.00	21%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	20%	12 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	18%	11 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.04	20%	10 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.01	20%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.04	22%	8 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.04	16%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.03	19%	7 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.00	14%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.11	23%	7 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	13%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.08	10%	7 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.00	18%	7 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	17%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	13%	7 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	13%	7 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.00	18%	7 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	21%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	14%	7 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.03	18%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	13%	6 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.01	23%	6 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	17%	6 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.01	13%	6 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	10%	6 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.06	22%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	18%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.13	19%	5 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.00	19%	5 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.02	23%	5 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.00	23%	5 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.09	17%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.00	19%	3 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	19%	3 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	23%	3 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.07	20%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.04	20%	2 Jul →