Timowoof

Timowoof — CS2 Stats

JP76561198030459472[U:1:70193744]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

899Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,436Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidAggressive Rifler
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning46
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD414613Last 10041%Win rateLWTWLLLLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.7
Aggression8.3
Utility4.4
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.6
Utility4.4
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact0.7

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time562ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy22.3%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 24.4% → last ⅓ avg 22.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — alpine 3–0
132Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
47In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 62% over 13anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC2381535%0.00
dust2A138562%0.01
mirageB137654%0.00
infernoD103730%-0.03
nukeC83538%0.01
anubisD72529%0.01
ancientD62433%-0.02
train4040%-0.03
boulder2020%0.01
vertigo21150%0.07
overpass220100%-0.02
alpine21150%0.07
agency21150%-0.05
shelter1010%0.03
fachwerk1010%-0.03
poseidon110100%0.10
stronghold110100%-0.01
golden110100%0.09
grail1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

59,366Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
3,887Matches
42.2%Match win rate
47.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
11.3%Shot accuracy
7,259MVPs
1,251Hours (in match)
4,204Bombs planted
931Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,955
AWP5,683
SSG 083,236
SCAR-203,222
Knife2,739
P901,325

Lifetime map wins

4,075dust2
3,241inferno
1,833nuke
1,089vertigo
822train
418cbble
275lake
259office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

25Matches
52%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
77.5ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1100%2.7119.0
Vertigo1100%0.609.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.9%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.0%Spray accuracy
87.5%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
564msReaction time
39.4%T opening success
42.6%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
11.67HE damage / grenade
3.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.263 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.4195% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke2–13-0.1117%16 Aug
cache13–8-0.0414%15 Aug
dust212–12-0.0312%15 Aug
dust213–8-0.0319%30 Jul
train3–13-0.0114%25 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0314%13 Jul
boulder6–130.0324%13 Jul
shelter9–130.0318%9 Jul
boulder7–13-0.0222%9 Jul
cache12–12-0.0432%9 Jul
cache8–130.0442%9 Jul
fachwerk11–13-0.0321%9 Jul
mirage4–130.0319%9 Jul
cache8–130.0434%8 Jul
dust29–13-0.0721%8 Jul
dust27–20.0725%8 Jul
cache13–2-0.0321%7 Jul
mirage13–2-0.0225%7 Jul
dust213–100.0322%7 Jul
cache9–130.0420%7 Jul
cache13–50.0530%2 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0924%27 Jun
dust23–13-0.0725%24 Jun
cache11–130.0633%24 Jun
inferno13–110.0219%23 Jun
anubis13–80.0220%14 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0911%14 Jun
cache12–12-0.0114%14 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0332%13 Jun
vertigo11–130.0211%5 Jun
cache12–120.0020%4 Jun
cache13–100.0342%4 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0220%26 May
dust26–20.0424%26 May
cache13–80.0618%25 May
cache13–100.1528%22 May
inferno7–13-0.0433%22 May
mirage13–90.0220%19 May
cache3–13-0.0836%18 May
mirage4–130.0438%9 May
cache1–13-0.0547%9 May
cache1–13-0.0324%6 May
cache7–13-0.0850%6 May
mirage4–5-0.0233%6 May
cache12–120.0023%6 May
cache13–100.0028%6 May
cache13–8-0.0222%30 Apr
cache4–13-0.0038%29 Apr
cache10–13-0.0129%29 Apr
cache12–12-0.0030%29 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0219%15 Feb
inferno8–13-0.046%15 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0819%15 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0248%15 Feb
inferno13–20.0042%15 Feb
anubis13–70.0610%14 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0518%13 Feb
ancient16–13-0.0630%10 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0429%10 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0124%10 Feb
ancient12–12-0.0211%9 Feb
anubis5–13-0.0414%9 Feb
inferno9–130.0629%8 Feb
nuke13–60.0310%4 Feb
inferno2–9-0.1419%3 Feb
mirage13–80.0725%3 Feb
train8–13-0.084%3 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0435%2 Feb
overpass13–10-0.0426%2 Feb
mirage13–40.0518%2 Feb
nuke1–80.0731%2 Feb
overpass13–100.0029%1 Feb
poseidon9–70.1039%29 Jan
nuke8–8-0.014%29 Jan
train2–13-0.0118%28 Jan
stronghold13–9-0.0124%28 Jan
anubis12–120.0620%28 Jan
dust213–60.0830%28 Jan
anubis7–13-0.0138%26 Jan
alpine3–00.2050%26 Jan
inferno4–13-0.0731%25 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0530%25 Jan
nuke12–120.0644%23 Jan
mirage13–50.0417%22 Jan
alpine2–13-0.050%22 Jan
anubis4–130.0121%22 Jan
dust213–70.0122%7 Jan
train7–13-0.0210%3 Jan
dust213–100.0726%2 Jan
nuke12–120.0919%2 Jan
vertigo13–70.1222%1 Jan
golden13–50.0925%1 Jan
ancient12–12-0.0124%23 Dec
dust213–8-0.0221%20 Dec
dust212–120.0422%14 Dec
ancient13–100.1016%14 Dec
dust24–13-0.0511%26 Oct
grail11–130.0223%6 Sept
agency11–13-0.0740%12 Aug
agency13–11-0.0320%7 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →