big bag of eggs

big bag of eggs — CS2 Stats

AU76561198028653803[U:1:68388075]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,820Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,115Hours in CS17Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidEntry Fragger
Premier CS Rating12,089Blue band · top ~43.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10534 of 14879 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,389 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbig bag of eggsFACEITLevel 7 · 1,389 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER12,089 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning67
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57394Last 10057%Win rateWWWLWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry FraggerHigh opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim8.5
Aggression10.0
Utility3.8
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels6.0
Clutch6.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 69% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.3° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 69% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.7
Utility3.8
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels6.0
Win Impact8.6

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time546ms−61ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy16.9%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–7
132Biggest win — nuke
8Longest win streak
W3Current streak
510In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 16anubisWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2213959%0.04
dust2A1811761%0.04
nukeS1611569%0.03
anubisC135838%0.01
cacheC104640%0.00
infernoA106460%0.02
ancientS96367%0.03
overpass21150%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

132,797Lifetime kills
1.17K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
6,450Matches
43.9%Match win rate
37.6%Headshot %
16.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
15,400MVPs
2,587Hours (in match)
5,740Bombs planted
1,881Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4740,807
AWP19,366
UMP-455,102
P2504,907
FAMAS2,754
P902,080

Lifetime map wins

19,490dust2
7,260inferno
3,472nuke
1,570vertigo
592train
301cbble
65dust
52ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

212Matches
51%Win rate
1.33Avg K/D
92.4ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

53%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5254%1.1917.4
Ancient3155%1.3116.7
Anubis2450%1.3616.3
Inferno2050%1.3719.8
Dust21656%1.2615.7
Nuke1362%1.6518.5
Vertigo1233%1.2317.1
Overpass978%1.8224.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
42.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.7%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
540msReaction time
39.1%T opening success
69.0%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
5.84HE damage / grenade
3.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4419 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.122% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–70.1425%27 Aug
dust213–90.0422%27 Aug
nuke13–50.0843%27 Aug
anubis14–160.1116%26 Aug
dust213–80.0916%26 Aug
nuke13–20.0715%26 Aug
mirage13–70.1410%26 Aug
nuke8–130.0220%24 Aug
mirage7–130.0411%24 Aug
nuke9–130.0317%24 Aug
nuke8–130.0213%23 Aug
cache11–130.0118%23 Aug
anubis6–130.0419%23 Aug
inferno15–150.0515%23 Aug
cache13–80.0319%23 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0015%23 Aug
dust213–50.1416%22 Aug
anubis13–40.037%22 Aug
ancient13–20.0610%22 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0021%21 Aug
dust215–150.0912%21 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0414%21 Aug
ancient13–30.1220%21 Aug
nuke13–60.0624%2 Aug
mirage13–80.036%2 Aug
inferno16–140.0918%2 Aug
dust213–90.0326%29 Jul
mirage13–60.0318%28 Jul
cache13–90.0322%28 Jul
dust27–13-0.0114%28 Jul
ancient13–90.0514%28 Jul
dust28–13-0.0311%23 Jul
anubis3–13-0.039%23 Jul
dust213–80.0621%23 Jul
nuke6–10.1424%22 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0312%22 Jul
mirage13–90.0514%21 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0117%21 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0712%21 Jul
cache13–50.0125%21 Jul
mirage13–90.0720%21 Jul
anubis13–16-0.024%20 Jul
dust211–130.1016%20 Jul
ancient15–150.0516%20 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0114%20 Jul
nuke13–8-0.077%19 Jul
anubis13–10-0.047%19 Jul
inferno13–80.0617%19 Jul
nuke11–130.0212%19 Jul
mirage13–110.0217%19 Jul
dust213–80.0213%18 Jul
mirage13–50.1017%18 Jul
cache8–130.0420%18 Jul
dust213–90.0118%18 Jul
ancient13–50.0813%18 Jul
mirage6–13-0.037%18 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0616%14 Jul
mirage13–80.0322%14 Jul
inferno13–90.0114%13 Jul
mirage11–130.047%13 Jul
inferno13–160.0114%13 Jul
cache10–130.0510%11 Jul
inferno3–130.0017%11 Jul
nuke13–100.0211%11 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0516%9 Jul
cache10–13-0.0413%9 Jul
cache13–70.0026%7 Jul
cache8–13-0.0826%7 Jul
anubis14–160.0313%30 Jun
dust213–30.0819%30 Jun
dust211–130.0218%30 Jun
cache9–13-0.0617%30 Jun
ancient0–13-0.079%30 Jun
mirage13–160.0013%30 Jun
nuke14–16-0.0312%29 Jun
nuke13–80.0710%29 Jun
dust29–130.0321%29 Jun
nuke16–130.0516%28 Jun
overpass1–9-0.007%28 Jun
mirage10–130.0920%26 Jun
anubis13–110.0415%26 Jun
dust28–130.0211%26 Jun
anubis7–13-0.067%25 Jun
nuke13–70.0024%25 Jun
overpass16–120.0214%23 Jun
mirage13–60.0318%23 Jun
dust216–140.0918%23 Jun
inferno13–50.0618%23 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0219%23 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0114%23 Jun
mirage15–150.059%22 Jun
mirage5–130.028%22 Jun
anubis13–100.079%22 Jun
dust213–110.0518%22 Jun
anubis13–20.0113%22 Jun
nuke13–100.0319%22 Jun
ancient16–130.0718%22 Jun
dust213–5-0.0417%22 Jun
mirage13–50.0923%22 Jun
inferno13–90.0735%22 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →