big bag of eggs — CS2 Stats
AU76561198028653803[U:1:68388075]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.
Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 90% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.
Where you differ: lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
CT openings. 69% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
Areas to improve
Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.3° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 69% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 22 | 13–9 | 59% | 0.04 | |
| A | 18 | 11–7 | 61% | 0.04 | |
| S | 16 | 11–5 | 69% | 0.03 | |
| C | 13 | 5–8 | 38% | 0.01 | |
| C | 10 | 4–6 | 40% | 0.00 | |
| A | 10 | 6–4 | 60% | 0.02 | |
| S | 9 | 6–3 | 67% | 0.03 | |
| — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | 0.01 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 52 | 54% | 1.19 | 17.4 |
| Ancient | 31 | 55% | 1.31 | 16.7 |
| Anubis | 24 | 50% | 1.36 | 16.3 |
| Inferno | 20 | 50% | 1.37 | 19.8 |
| Dust2 | 16 | 56% | 1.26 | 15.7 |
| Nuke | 13 | 62% | 1.65 | 18.5 |
| Vertigo | 12 | 33% | 1.23 | 17.1 |
| Overpass | 9 | 78% | 1.82 | 24.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4419 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.122% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13–7 | 0.14 | 25% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.04 | 22% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.08 | 43% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 14–16 | 0.11 | 16% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.09 | 16% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.07 | 15% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.14 | 10% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.02 | 20% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.04 | 11% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.03 | 17% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.02 | 13% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.01 | 18% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.04 | 19% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.05 | 15% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.03 | 19% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.00 | 15% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.14 | 16% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.03 | 7% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.06 | 10% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.00 | 21% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.09 | 12% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.04 | 14% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.12 | 20% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.06 | 24% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.03 | 6% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.09 | 18% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.03 | 26% | 29 Jul → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.03 | 18% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.03 | 22% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.01 | 14% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.05 | 14% | 28 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.03 | 11% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.03 | 9% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.06 | 21% | 23 Jul → | ||
| 6–1 | 0.14 | 24% | 22 Jul → | ||
| 16–13 | -0.03 | 12% | 22 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.05 | 14% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 13–4 | -0.01 | 17% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.07 | 12% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.01 | 25% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.07 | 20% | 21 Jul → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.02 | 4% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.10 | 16% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.05 | 16% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.01 | 14% | 20 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.07 | 7% | 19 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.04 | 7% | 19 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.06 | 17% | 19 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.02 | 12% | 19 Jul → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 17% | 19 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.02 | 13% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.10 | 17% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.04 | 20% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.01 | 18% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.08 | 13% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.03 | 7% | 18 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.06 | 16% | 14 Jul → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.03 | 22% | 14 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.01 | 14% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.04 | 7% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 13–16 | 0.01 | 14% | 13 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.05 | 10% | 11 Jul → | ||
| 3–13 | 0.00 | 17% | 11 Jul → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.02 | 11% | 11 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.05 | 16% | 9 Jul → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.04 | 13% | 9 Jul → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.00 | 26% | 7 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.08 | 26% | 7 Jul → | ||
| 14–16 | 0.03 | 13% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.08 | 19% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.02 | 18% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.06 | 17% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 0–13 | -0.07 | 9% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 13–16 | 0.00 | 13% | 30 Jun → | ||
| 14–16 | -0.03 | 12% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.07 | 10% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.03 | 21% | 29 Jun → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.05 | 16% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 1–9 | -0.00 | 7% | 28 Jun → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.09 | 20% | 26 Jun → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.04 | 15% | 26 Jun → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.02 | 11% | 26 Jun → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.06 | 7% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.00 | 24% | 25 Jun → | ||
| 16–12 | 0.02 | 14% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.03 | 18% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.09 | 18% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.06 | 18% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.02 | 19% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 14% | 23 Jun → | ||
| 15–15 | 0.05 | 9% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.02 | 8% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.07 | 9% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.05 | 18% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 13–2 | 0.01 | 13% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.03 | 19% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.07 | 18% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.04 | 17% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.09 | 23% | 22 Jun → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.07 | 35% | 22 Jun → |
Match data via Leetify.