RaisinSwirlBread — CS2 Stats

76561198028071043[U:1:67805315]✓ No bans

401Tracked matches37%Win rate2024Tracked since

436Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim60

Positioning55

Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–42–9Last 10049%Win rateWWWLLLLTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.0

Aggression7.1

Utility4.5

Positioning5.5

Opening Duels3.1

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0

Positioning5.5

Utility4.5

Mechanics4.0

Opening Duels3.9

Win Impact0.7

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time604ms−11ms

first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 604ms

Headshot accuracy15.9%+5.1%

first ⅓ avg 10.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — mirage 13–4

13–2Biggest win — inferno

8Longest win streak

W3Current streak

3–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 55% over 22vertigoWeakest map · 40% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	32	16–16	50%	0.03
mirage	B	24	11–13	46%	0.01
inferno	A	22	12–10	55%	0.03
nuke	B	8	4–4	50%	0.01
vertigo	C	5	2–3	40%	0.03
train	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.01
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	0.03
cache	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.05
ancient	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

16,382Lifetime kills

1.19K/D · Top 25% of tracked players

858Matches

31.5%Match win rate

34.4%Headshot %

2.0%Shot accuracy

1,252MVPs

228Hours (in match)

668Bombs planted

111Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP2,456

AK-471,990

M4A4 / M4A1-S1,838

Desert Eagle793

P2000 / USP-S654

Negev547

MP7507

Galil AR503

Glock-18428

MP9424

Lifetime map wins

1,978dust2

953inferno

319train

240vertigo

167nuke

62office

61ar_shoots

37ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy

33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.7%Spray accuracy

67.9%Counter-strafing

10.5°Preaim

598msReaction time

23.5%T opening success

61.2%CT opening success

0.60Enemies flashed / flash

3.0%Flash assists

6.11HE damage / grenade

12.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 23.5004% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–9	0.13	19%	28 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.04	14%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.05	21%	28 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	6%	27 Aug →
train	10–13	0.02	10%	27 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	33%	16 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.10	7%	12 Aug →
inferno	12–12	-0.02	13%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.04	17%	12 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.07	13%	2 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	25%	2 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.04	10%	27 Jul →
inferno	4–13	0.01	14%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.13	14%	27 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	14%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.08	21%	25 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	11%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.09	13%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	26%	9 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	0.05	11%	7 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.07	7%	7 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.07	12%	7 Jul →
train	12–12	-0.03	13%	6 Jul →
nuke	3–0	0.08	17%	6 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.05	5%	6 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	10%	30 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.12	15%	30 Jun →
vertigo	9–13	-0.01	18%	12 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.02	50%	12 Jun →
dust2	8–13	0.01	24%	7 Jun →
dust2	16–13	0.02	18%	22 May →
nuke	2–13	-0.02	15%	18 May →
dust2	9–13	0.05	10%	12 May →
train	13–9	-0.03	7%	30 Apr →
cache	0–9	-0.06	13%	30 Apr →
dust2	13–9	0.03	14%	28 Apr →
dust2	12–12	-0.06	17%	22 Apr →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	11%	22 Apr →
inferno	13–8	0.06	13%	22 Apr →
nuke	8–13	0.02	9%	17 Apr →
dust2	13–5	0.01	9%	17 Apr →
inferno	12–12	0.02	8%	17 Apr →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	11%	17 Apr →
overpass	13–10	0.02	11%	17 Apr →
mirage	2–13	-0.03	13%	16 Apr →
dust2	12–12	0.00	7%	16 Apr →
inferno	13–6	0.03	8%	16 Apr →
inferno	11–13	0.00	21%	10 Apr →
mirage	13–4	0.21	26%	10 Apr →
inferno	7–13	0.03	15%	9 Apr →
dust2	13–10	0.04	13%	9 Apr →
overpass	13–8	0.01	10%	4 Apr →
inferno	13–8	0.05	2%	4 Apr →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	6%	4 Apr →
mirage	9–13	0.05	13%	1 Apr →
dust2	13–11	0.00	17%	1 Apr →
mirage	9–0	0.11	26%	1 Apr →
vertigo	13–6	0.07	9%	1 Apr →
overpass	6–13	0.05	9%	26 Mar →
inferno	13–2	-0.03	14%	26 Mar →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	5%	26 Mar →
dust2	0–4	-0.10	0%	26 Mar →
inferno	13–3	0.09	2%	26 Mar →
dust2	12–12	0.12	7%	20 Mar →
mirage	1–13	-0.09	15%	20 Mar →
nuke	7–13	0.05	13%	20 Mar →
dust2	12–12	0.09	10%	18 Mar →
mirage	13–6	0.06	11%	18 Mar →
inferno	4–13	-0.01	0%	14 Mar →
dust2	12–12	0.00	13%	14 Mar →
nuke	13–9	0.03	7%	12 Mar →
vertigo	4–13	0.01	5%	12 Mar →
nuke	13–5	-0.09	6%	11 Mar →
dust2	5–13	-0.00	11%	11 Mar →
dust2	4–9	0.07	7%	11 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.04	9%	9 Mar →
dust2	7–13	0.08	10%	6 Mar →
mirage	13–5	0.00	19%	1 Mar →
dust2	13–6	0.00	8%	1 Mar →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	14%	27 Feb →
inferno	10–13	0.06	13%	23 Feb →
mirage	9–13	0.03	12%	23 Feb →
inferno	13–4	-0.05	15%	22 Feb →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	6%	22 Feb →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	11%	22 Feb →
inferno	13–9	0.09	11%	22 Feb →
inferno	13–7	0.13	20%	21 Feb →
dust2	13–3	0.13	12%	21 Feb →
inferno	13–3	0.19	10%	16 Feb →
nuke	13–4	0.06	9%	16 Feb →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	15%	7 Feb →
inferno	11–13	0.13	19%	7 Feb →
dust2	13–4	0.10	8%	6 Feb →
mirage	13–6	0.12	6%	6 Feb →
mirage	13–7	0.05	16%	5 Feb →
dust2	13–7	0.05	5%	5 Feb →
inferno	13–4	0.04	20%	5 Feb →
dust2	13–5	0.06	14%	31 Jan →
vertigo	13–11	0.02	8%	31 Jan →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	10%	31 Jan →