๐ฏ๐๐๐๐ โ CS2 Stats
CK76561198021668365[U:1:61402637]Steam profile โโ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,109), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here โ those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 9 median | Level 10 median | vs Level 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 51.4% | 49.0% | 52.0% | meets |
| Shot accuracy | 13.9% | 13.1% | 13.7% | meets |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.98 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 0.11 short |
| Match win rate | 37.9% | 46.9% | 48.8% | 10.9% short |
This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms โ not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0โ100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate ยท -0.03 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Entry Fragger โ High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.
Sharp aimer
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 90% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.
Where you differ: lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 87 โ the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success โ winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game โ the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 22 | 13โ9 | 59% | 0.04 | |
| A | 20 | 12โ8 | 60% | 0.02 | |
| B | 19 | 10โ9 | 53% | 0.04 | |
| B | 13 | 7โ6 | 54% | 0.01 | |
| C | 11 | 4โ7 | 36% | 0.01 | |
| D | 7 | 2โ5 | 29% | 0.01 | |
| C | 7 | 3โ4 | 43% | 0.02 | |
| โ | 1 | 0โ1 | 0% | -0.04 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam โ visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dust2 | 40 | 48% | 1.15 | 18.4 |
| Mirage | 37 | 62% | 1.50 | 17.5 |
| Ancient | 17 | 41% | 1.14 | 17.0 |
| Anubis | 16 | 50% | 1.09 | 16.4 |
| Inferno | 8 | 50% | 1.45 | 23.6 |
| Nuke | 8 | 38% | 1.10 | 20.1 |
| Vertigo | 6 | 33% | 0.91 | 14.5 |
| Cache | 2 | 0% | 1.26 | 19.5 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics โ lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
29% win rate across 7 tracked games โ your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10โ13 | 0.05 | 25% | 28 Aug โ | ||
| 8โ13 | 0.02 | 32% | 28 Aug โ | ||
| 4โ13 | 0.03 | 43% | 20 Aug โ | ||
| 13โ4 | 0.05 | 18% | 20 Aug โ | ||
| 4โ13 | -0.00 | 41% | 20 Aug โ | ||
| 13โ8 | 0.05 | 19% | 20 Aug โ | ||
| 4โ13 | -0.04 | 12% | 19 Aug โ | ||
| 15โ15 | 0.04 | 8% | 18 Aug โ | ||
| 13โ6 | 0.04 | 25% | 18 Aug โ | ||
| 13โ7 | 0.03 | 22% | 18 Aug โ | ||
| 13โ4 | 0.08 | 44% | 17 Aug โ | ||
| 7โ13 | 0.03 | 38% | 17 Aug โ | ||
| 0โ9 | -0.00 | 23% | 17 Aug โ | ||
| 15โ15 | 0.05 | 30% | 17 Aug โ | ||
| 11โ13 | 0.13 | 21% | 17 Aug โ | ||
| 13โ1 | 0.07 | 31% | 10 Aug โ | ||
| 8โ13 | -0.01 | 21% | 10 Aug โ | ||
| 13โ7 | 0.13 | 37% | 10 Aug โ | ||
| 13โ5 | 0.02 | 30% | 10 Aug โ | ||
| 13โ6 | 0.07 | 33% | 3 Aug โ | ||
| 13โ1 | 0.18 | 22% | 2 Aug โ | ||
| 11โ13 | 0.03 | 41% | 2 Aug โ | ||
| 11โ13 | -0.03 | 22% | 2 Aug โ | ||
| 4โ13 | -0.05 | 33% | 2 Aug โ | ||
| 13โ8 | 0.14 | 28% | 2 Aug โ | ||
| 7โ13 | -0.02 | 26% | 30 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ4 | 0.03 | 18% | 30 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ5 | -0.01 | 17% | 30 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ4 | 0.11 | 23% | 30 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ3 | 0.01 | 21% | 30 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ7 | 0.06 | 12% | 30 Jul โ | ||
| 0โ13 | -0.05 | 33% | 28 Jul โ | ||
| 11โ13 | -0.01 | 20% | 28 Jul โ | ||
| 8โ13 | 0.06 | 23% | 28 Jul โ | ||
| 15โ15 | 0.02 | 21% | 27 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ10 | -0.03 | 27% | 27 Jul โ | ||
| 11โ13 | 0.01 | 38% | 27 Jul โ | ||
| 7โ13 | 0.02 | 32% | 27 Jul โ | ||
| 8โ13 | 0.01 | 24% | 27 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ10 | 0.01 | 19% | 27 Jul โ | ||
| 8โ13 | -0.06 | 10% | 26 Jul โ | ||
| 0โ13 | -0.01 | 13% | 26 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ6 | 0.01 | 27% | 26 Jul โ | ||
| 5โ13 | 0.03 | 8% | 26 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ11 | -0.01 | 31% | 26 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ6 | 0.03 | 14% | 26 Jul โ | ||
| 5โ13 | -0.00 | 21% | 26 Jul โ | ||
| 4โ13 | -0.02 | 35% | 26 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ7 | -0.03 | 23% | 26 Jul โ | ||
| 14โ16 | 0.06 | 28% | 26 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ11 | 0.09 | 16% | 26 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ11 | -0.02 | 24% | 25 Jul โ | ||
| 12โ5 | -0.08 | 14% | 25 Jul โ | ||
| 9โ13 | -0.03 | 17% | 25 Jul โ | ||
| 16โ14 | 0.00 | 22% | 25 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ3 | 0.08 | 27% | 25 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ3 | -0.02 | 32% | 25 Jul โ | ||
| 7โ13 | -0.00 | 24% | 25 Jul โ | ||
| 10โ13 | -0.01 | 9% | 19 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ5 | 0.07 | 28% | 19 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ11 | 0.05 | 26% | 19 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ9 | 0.10 | 18% | 19 Jul โ | ||
| 12โ16 | -0.01 | 15% | 19 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ7 | 0.02 | 23% | 19 Jul โ | ||
| 14โ16 | 0.08 | 28% | 19 Jul โ | ||
| 11โ13 | 0.01 | 18% | 19 Jul โ | ||
| 10โ13 | -0.04 | 17% | 19 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ9 | 0.09 | 21% | 19 Jul โ | ||
| 11โ13 | -0.01 | 10% | 19 Jul โ | ||
| 10โ13 | -0.03 | 24% | 17 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ3 | -0.03 | 33% | 17 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ4 | 0.10 | 23% | 17 Jul โ | ||
| 10โ13 | 0.02 | 17% | 17 Jul โ | ||
| 6โ13 | -0.03 | 12% | 17 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ0 | 0.04 | 14% | 17 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ16 | -0.03 | 29% | 16 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ10 | 0.01 | 26% | 16 Jul โ | ||
| 15โ15 | 0.04 | 22% | 16 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ11 | 0.08 | 16% | 16 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ4 | 0.09 | 30% | 16 Jul โ | ||
| 11โ13 | -0.04 | 16% | 15 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ8 | 0.04 | 25% | 15 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ10 | 0.02 | 31% | 15 Jul โ | ||
| 16โ14 | -0.06 | 13% | 15 Jul โ | ||
| 16โ13 | 0.01 | 28% | 15 Jul โ | ||
| 14โ16 | 0.07 | 23% | 15 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ16 | -0.06 | 16% | 15 Jul โ | ||
| 6โ13 | 0.02 | 11% | 15 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ5 | 0.03 | 20% | 11 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ16 | 0.03 | 25% | 11 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ4 | 0.05 | 29% | 11 Jul โ | ||
| 7โ1 | -0.00 | 15% | 11 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ11 | -0.01 | 14% | 11 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ10 | 0.10 | 17% | 11 Jul โ | ||
| 9โ4 | 0.12 | 26% | 11 Jul โ | ||
| 5โ9 | -0.02 | 33% | 11 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ9 | 0.08 | 65% | 11 Jul โ | ||
| 13โ7 | -0.04 | 21% | 10 Jul โ | ||
| 15โ15 | -0.04 | 16% | 10 Jul โ | ||
| 8โ13 | -0.03 | 18% | 10 Jul โ |
Match data via Leetify.