poachedguppy — CS2 Stats

US76561198015777768[U:1:55512040]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

1,702Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since

1,791Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,140Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#14617 of 38382 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,762), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 7 median	Level 8 median	vs Level 8
Headshot rate	56.9%	46.1%	47.0%	above
Shot accuracy	7.6%	12.6%	12.7%	5.1% short
Kill/death ratio	1.37	1.05	1.07	above
Match win rate	47.1%	45.7%	46.4%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86

Positioning63

Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateLLTWLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.6

Aggression7.6

Utility4.8

Positioning6.3

Opening Duels3.4

Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6

Positioning6.3

Utility4.8

Mechanics8.5

Opening Duels3.4

Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time558ms−45ms

first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms

Headshot accuracy18.2%+0.2%

first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — nuke 13–3

13–1Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

L2Current streak

7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

15Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 7ancientWeakest map · 42% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	23	13–10	57%	0.02
nuke	B	23	11–12	48%	0.02
mirage	A	14	8–6	57%	-0.02
ancient	C	12	5–7	42%	-0.01
anubis	B	10	5–5	50%	0.01
cache	S	7	5–2	71%	0.01
inferno	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.03
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	0.04
office	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.00
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05
debris	—	1	1–0	100%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

71,150Lifetime kills

1.37K/D · Top 10% of Level 7 players

3,201Matches

47.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players

56.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players

7.6%Shot accuracy

8,802MVPs

968Hours (in match)

2,329Bombs planted

692Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,915

AWP8,459

M4A4 / M4A1-S7,736

Desert Eagle6,241

P2000 / USP-S4,015

Glock-182,448

SSG 081,351

MAC-101,013

MP9808

Knife684

Lifetime map wins

3,307nuke

2,012inferno

1,840dust2

1,683vertigo

1,020train

825office

216cbble

114lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

178Matches

53%Win rate

1.25Avg K/D

82.9ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	29	48%	1.10	16.5
Nuke	28	68%	1.47	18.1
Anubis	24	46%	1.24	15.9
Ancient	23	65%	1.49	20.9
Inferno	20	40%	1.06	18.1
Dust2	19	47%	1.10	15.5
Vertigo	18	61%	1.28	18.7
Train	6	50%	1.44	17.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy

38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.4%Spray accuracy

88.4%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

549msReaction time

32.3%T opening success

55.0%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

11.1%Flash assists

8.53HE damage / grenade

4.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4671 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.3111% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	8–13	0.02	23%	21 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	32%	21 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.01	20%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.02	22%	16 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.00	16%	16 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.02	30%	16 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.04	16%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.08	23%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	14%	15 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.04	15%	15 Aug →
dust2	3–13	0.06	17%	15 Aug →
nuke	14–16	-0.02	26%	15 Aug →
office	13–6	-0.03	20%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.05	11%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.03	16%	11 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	16%	11 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	14%	8 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	19%	8 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.01	23%	8 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.09	19%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.05	14%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.00	17%	8 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.02	24%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.09	15%	7 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	14%	4 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.06	9%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.10	12%	3 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	13%	2 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.06	10%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.09	26%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.02	15%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	24%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.02	15%	1 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	16%	1 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	23%	1 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.02	33%	1 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.09	39%	1 Aug →
nuke	10–3	0.06	23%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.02	28%	1 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	19%	31 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.01	9%	30 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	20%	30 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.04	26%	26 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	46%	26 Jul →
ancient	16–12	0.01	21%	26 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.01	22%	26 Jul →
anubis	16–14	0.01	16%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–1	-0.02	32%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.01	15%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.03	21%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.05	18%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.05	17%	26 Jul →
dust2	16–14	0.03	21%	26 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.04	18%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.01	26%	25 Jul →
anubis	14–16	0.05	17%	25 Jul →
poseidon	9–4	0.05	3%	25 Jul →
debris	9–1	0.05	9%	25 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.04	18%	23 Jul →
nuke	16–12	0.07	21%	23 Jul →
office	5–13	0.03	33%	23 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.01	15%	18 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	19%	17 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.04	15%	3 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.04	17%	28 Jun →
anubis	13–6	0.06	29%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	16%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.00	20%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–16	-0.03	12%	27 Jun →
ancient	11–13	0.02	14%	25 Jun →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	14%	21 Jun →
inferno	13–16	-0.00	14%	21 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.01	7%	21 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.00	19%	21 Jun →
dust2	13–1	0.13	16%	21 Jun →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	16%	21 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.07	13%	21 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.00	27%	21 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	10%	19 Jun →
dust2	7–13	0.02	21%	19 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.02	25%	19 Jun →
ancient	8–13	0.01	20%	17 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	17%	17 Jun →
overpass	13–10	0.01	25%	17 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	24%	16 Jun →
nuke	13–3	0.13	19%	16 Jun →
overpass	11–13	0.04	17%	16 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	19%	16 Jun →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	15%	16 Jun →
nuke	13–5	0.04	37%	16 Jun →
anubis	13–8	0.01	16%	16 Jun →
dust2	13–16	-0.03	25%	15 Jun →
inferno	15–15	0.00	11%	15 Jun →
nuke	15–15	-0.01	8%	15 Jun →
cache	13–9	0.02	20%	14 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.08	12%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.06	18%	12 Jun →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	10%	12 Jun →
overpass	13–11	0.06	34%	11 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.04	16%	11 Jun →